SEYFELİ, Canan, “Osmanlı Devlet Salnamelerinde Rum Melkit Katolik Patrikliği (1847-1918)”, Karadeniz (Black Sea-Çernoye More) Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Yıl 3, Sayı 11, 2011, ss. 9-39. (original) (raw)
Related papers
In the Ottoman Empire, one of the officials within the hierarchical structure of the Orthodox Greek Patriarchate was the metropolitans. Metropolitans were responsible for the administration of churches and communities in various regions within the jurisdiction of the patriarchate. Their duties included organizing and managing religious ceremonies, providing religious education, overseeing the administration of the church and its properties, supervising the priests, and maintaining internal discipline. This article examines the roles and relationships of metropolitans affiliated with the Istanbul Greek Patriarchate during the Ottoman period. The research analyzes the structure in the XVIIIth century based on contemporary sources. Metropolitans were individuals who served in both religious and administrative capacities within the Ottoman administrative system and the patriarchate. As part of the patriarchal system, metropolitans not only fulfilled religious duties but also performed nonreligious tasks such as tax collection and maintaining social balance. Thus, the role of metropolitans extended beyond religious leadership, encompassing significant responsibilities in various aspects of society. For this study, original documents from various classifications in the Ottoman archives of the State Archives of the Presidency of the Republic of Turkey were meticulously examined, and in-depth research was conducted using the historical analysis method based on cause and effect relationships. The findings, along with the existing literature, were evaluated and presented from a scholarly perspective. Based on these investigations, it has been determined and confirmed from Ottoman sources that metropolitans held institutional authority at the spiritual, social, and administrative levels. While fulfilling their responsibilities in line with the relationships between the Patriarchate and the central government, they carried responsibilities towards both authorities. The appointment of metropolitans was subject to the approval of the Patriarchate and the central government, granting them an official status. This confirms that metropolitans possessed both spiritual and official qualities. They operated under the authority of the Patriarchate, implementing its decisions and policies. Additionally, they maintained an indirect relationship with the central bureaucracy of the Ottoman state. However, the pervasive nature of central authority in the Ottoman system meant that this indirect relationship could readily evolve into direct contact. During the XVIIIth century, as cooperation between Ottoman administrative institutions and church institutions Filiz Yaşar Keskin 1990 increased, the prominence of such roles for metropolitans aligned with the developments of the period. In conclusion, within the Ottoman administrative structure, metropolitans were not solely responsible to the Patriarchate but also held obligations towards the central government. They played significant roles as influential figures assuming both religious and official functions in Ottoman society. Through their direct relations with the Patriarchate and indirect connections with the Ottoman state, they effectively regulated the religious and social life of the community. This duality in their responsibilities derived from the nature of their role, shaping their institutional attributes, and reflected the centralizing tendencies of the Ottoman society's complex structure.
Dicle İlahiyat Dergisi (DİD) Cilt: XIX, Sayı: 2017/2, 2017
The subject of the article is about the administration of the Syrian Catholic Patriarchate and its status in the Ottoman State Annuals (Salname-i Devlet-i Aliye-i Osmaniye) between 1847 and 1918. The main source of this study is the official state annuals, which were published 68 issues between these dates. The aim is to present the point of view to Syrian Catholics in Ottoman official publications. It is also to facilitate the understanding of the situation of Syrian Catholics in the administrative system of non-Muslims in the Ottoman Empire by means of official documents. The Ottoman administrated non-Muslims with the ”tradition of preserving the situation before the conquest”. Among the ancient Syriacs, the Catholicism was effectively under Ottoman rule. He kept them before the Ottoman conquest and accepted them from the Syriac Ancients. Ottoman, preserving the state before conquest it accepted them not separated from Syriac Ancients. Ottoman preserved the situation before the conquest and he accepted the Catholics who were not separated from the Syriac Ancients. For this reason, until 1831, the administration remained attached to the Syrian Patriarchate. The ancient Syrians have been subject to the Armenian Patriarchate since 1517 in the Jerusalem-based hierarchy and since 1783 in the Mardin-based hierarchy. Thus, it is possible that the Syrian Catholics belonged to the Armenian Patriarchate. Ottoman Catholics are admitted as a different hierarchy (nation-millet) by Sultan Mahmut II (1830). Priest Andon Nurican was elected as the first leader of Ottoman Catholics. Pope approved him as the archbishop of İstanbul. But, Ottoman government didn’t approve because of the fact that he wasn’t a citizen of Ottoman. Hagop Chuqurian was elected in place of him. Ottoman government approved him as the leader of Ottoman Catholics on 5 January 1831. The second leader was entitled patriarch by Ottoman government in 1835. The other Ottoman Catohilic Nations (Syrian Catholics, Chaldeans, Maronites, Melkites, Bulgarian Catholics) were subordinated to Armenian Catholic hieararchy. The Syriac Catholic Patriarchate’s adherence to this hierarchy continued until the late Ottoman period. In addition, Syriac Catholics were recorded in 48 issues from the second session to the last, which included non-Muslims.
Sosyal Bilimler Araştırma Dergisi (SBArD), 2018
The subject of the article is the administration of the Chaldean Patriarchate. The Ottoman State Annuals are official state almanacs published between in 68 issues between the years of 1847-1918. The aim of the study is to reveal the Ottoman view of the Chaldean Patriarchate in official publications. The Chaldean Patriarchate is an eastern church of Rome. This church, which was excommunicated due to the views of double nature (dyophysitism) and Mary, who gave birth to a human being (antropokos), was separated and formed as Catholics from the Nestorian, the Eastern Syriac, Church in the Council of Ephesus in 431. This formation clearly started with the separation in 1552, but it was possible in 1830 to walk regularly in a single line. While the Ottoman State ruled non-Muslims with the ‘tradition of preserving the situation before the conquest’, the ruling of the Chaldeans was carried out in two different ways (1831). Since the Chaldeans were originally Nestorian, the Ottoman preserved the situation before the conquest and accepted them in the administration of the Nestorian Church. It is understood that the Nestorians were subject to the Armenian Patriarchate of Istanbul even in the late Ottoman period through the Ancient Assyrian Patriarchate. It can also be said that the Chaldean Patriarchate was affiliated to the Armenian Patriarchate through the Nestorians before 1831. On January 5, 1831, when the Ottoman Catholics were considered as a separate hierarchy, the Chaldean Patriarchate was also subject to the Catholic Patriarchate of Istanbul. There is no document indicating the separation of the Chaldeans in the administration of this patriarchate, chosen from the Catholic Armenians.
Sakarya ve çevresi, Antikçağ’da Bithynia olarak anılan coğrafi bölgenin sınırları içerisinde yer almaktadır. Bölge Hellenistik Bithynia Krallığı’nın M.Ö. 74’te Romalılara ilhakıyla birlikte Roma egemenliğine girmeye başlamış, nihayetinde M.Ö. 63’ten itibaren Romalı yönetici ve komutan Büyük Pompeius’un oluşturduğu “Pontus et Bithynia” Eyaleti’nin bir parçası olmuştur. Antik Çağ’da çoğunluğu kırsal kesime denk düşen Sakarya’nın, Roma İmparatorluk Dönemi’ndeki dini inanışları, burada yaşayan bilhassa Hellen kökenli kırsal kesim inanışlarının yansıması şeklindedir. Roma egemenliğine girilmesi, bölgedeki Hellenik kültürel unsurları değiştirmemiş, dini inanışlar da, eskiden olduğu gibi aynı çerçevede devam etmiştir. Yüzey araştırmalarında kayda geçmiş, Roma İmparatorluk Dönemi’ne ait Eski Yunanca yazıtlı adaklar, bu devamlılığı açık bir şekilde ortaya koymaktadır. Tapınım gören tanrı ve tanrıçalar arasında Zeus kültlerinin önemli bir yeri vardır. Bunlar arasında “Zeus Bronton”, “Zeus Okkonenos”, “Zeus Ouebreanos”, “Zeus Soter” ve “Theos Agathos”un, dini inanışlar arasında önemli bir paya sahip olduğu gözlemlenir. Sahip olduğu söz konusu epitheton’ları, Zeus’un bölgedeki Hellen öncesi var olan yerel tanrılarla kaynaştığını ve ayrıca kültlerinin niteliğini genel hatlarıyla ortaya koymaktadır. Bu dini unsurların yanı sıra, Phrygia Bölgesi’nden doğarak, Sakarya üzerinden Pontos Eukseinos’a (Karadeniz) ulaşan ve içinden geçtiği tarım arazilerine hayat veren Sangarios nehri, bu özelliğiyle, çiftçi ve köylülerin şükranlarını sunduğu bir nehir tanrısı olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır.