Time course of gaze influences on postural responses to neck proprioceptive and galvanic vestibular stimulation in humans (original) (raw)
Related papers
The concept of body schema has been introduced and widely discussed in the literature to explain various clinical observations and distortions in the body and space representation. Here we address the role of body schema related information in multi-joint limb motion. The processing of proprioceptive information may differ significantly in static and dynamic conditions since in the latter case the control system may employ specific dynamic rules and constraints. Accordingly, the perception of movement, e.g., estimation of step length and walking distance, may rely on a priori knowledge about intrinsic dynamics of limb segment motion and inherent relationships between gait parameters and body proportions. The findings are discussed in the general framework of space and body movement representation and suggest the existence of a dynamic locomotor body schema used for controlling step length and path estimation.
Human Movement Science, 2011
Sudden addition or removal of visual information can be particularly critical to balance control. The promptness of adaptation of stance control mechanisms is quantified by the latency at which body oscillation and postural muscle activity vary after a shift in visual condition. In the present study, volunteers stood on a force platform with feet parallel or in tandem. Shifts in visual condition were produced by electronic spectacles. Ground reaction force (center of foot pressure, CoP) and EMG of leg postural muscles were acquired, and latency of CoP and EMG changes estimated by t-tests on the averaged traces. Time-to-reach steady-state was estimated by means of an exponential model. On allowing or occluding vision, decrements and increments in CoP position and oscillation occurred within about 2 s. These were preceded by changes in muscle activity, regardless of visual-shift direction, foot position or front or rear leg in tandem. These time intervals were longer than simple reaction-time responses. The time course of recovery to steady-state was about 3 s, shorter for oscillation than position. The capacity of modifying balance control at very short intervals both during quiet standing and under more critical balance conditions speaks in favor of a necessary coupling between vision, postural reference, and postural muscle activity, and of the swiftness of this sensory reweighing process.
Experimental Brain Research, 2005
When standing and balancing on a continuously and predictably moving platform, body equilibrium relies on both anticipatory control and proprioceptive feedback. We have vibrated different postural muscles of the body to assess any effect of confounding the proprioceptive input on balance during such unstable conditions. Low and high platform oscillation frequencies were used, because different strategies are used to withstand the two perturbations. Eyes open (EO) and closed (EC) conditions were also tested, to assess whether the stabilizing effect of vision is independent from the proprioceptive disturbance. Subjects (n=14) performed two series of trials, EO and EC: (1) quiet erect stance, (2) stance on the platform translating at 0.2 or 0.6 Hz sinusoidally in the anteroposterior (A-P) direction (dynamic conditions). Continuous bilateral vibration (90 Hz) was produced by two vibrators fixed to the following homonymous muscles: dorsal neck, quadriceps, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, and triceps surae. Acquisition of body segments’ displacement began 10 s after the start of platform translation. From markers fixed to head, hip, and malleolus, we computed the A-P oscillation of head and hip, body orientation in space, and cross-correlation (CC) and time-delay between malleolus and head trajectories. The results were (a) the head A-P oscillation was smaller with EO than EC, under both quiet stance and dynamic conditions; (b) vibration of tibialis and triceps surae, but not of other muscles, slightly increased head and body A-P oscillation with EC under dynamic conditions; (c) at 0.2 Hz but not at 0.6 Hz, for all visual and vibration conditions, there was a significant association between head and feet; (d) at 0.2 Hz, EC, neck muscle vibration increased this association, whereas vibration of the other muscles induced a major time delay in the oscillation of head compared with feet; (e) vibration of either neck or tibialis induced forward body leaning, while vibration of either triceps surae or biceps femoris induced backward leaning, with both EO and EC, under both static and dynamic conditions; (f) the head A-P oscillation, however, under dynamic conditions was not dependent on body leaning. The relatively scarce effects of proprioceptive disturbance on head stabilization and multijoint coordination (in spite of effects on body orientation similar to those observed during stance) speak for a major role of anticipatory control in the dynamic equilibrium task. However, the significant vibration-induced time delay in segments’ coordination at low translation frequency, EC, suggests that the normally patterned Ia input promotes continuous adjustments of the feed-forward control mode.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.