The Specter of Leviathan in the Central-Local Relations: a Comparative Historical Analysis of the Decentralization Reform in Thailand and the Philippines (original) (raw)
Related papers
A Comparative Measure of Decentralization for Southeast Asia
In this article we set out a fine-grained measure of the formal authority of intermediate subnational government for Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, South Korea, and Thailand that is designed to be a flexible tool in the hands of researchers and policymakers. It improves on prior measures by providing annual estimates across ten dimensions of regional authority; it disaggregates to the level of the individual region; and it examines individual regional tiers, asymmetric regions, and regions with special arrangements. We use the measure and its elements to summarize six decades of regional governance in Southeast Asia and conclude by noting how the Regional Authority index could further the dialogue between theory and empirics in the study of decentralization and democratization.
Yap - Good Governance and Decentralization in Southeast Asia
2008
Good governance is defined here as "the quality of the relationship between the government and its citizens whom it exists to serve and protect" and operationalized as "the quality of the ways in which decisions on public affairs are reached and are implemented, and by implication the quality of the decisions as such". Criteria for good governance include participation, inclusiveness, transparency, accountability, rule of law, subsidiarity, effectiveness and efficiency.
Decentralization Discourse in Public Policy of Thailand
Social Science Research Network, 2017
The purpose of this research was threefold. Firstly, it aimed to examine and critically analyzed the text of the decentralization discourse in the Thai public policy. Secondly, it studied and critically analyzed the practice of such discourse through the implementation of the policy in terms of local administrative regulations. And thirdly, it critically analyzed the result of such discourse that affects local administration and also recommends the approach to resolve the problems stemming from decentralization in local administration. The data were gathered from relevant documents, policies, laws, regulations, and from the interview of experts in local administration and government. Critical discourse analysis was chiefly employed for data analysis. Research results were as follows. First, the text of the decentralization policy in the Constitution, the state administrative policy, and the decentralization law covered the promotion of decentralization that complied with the principle of decentralization and the principle of local administration and government. The text's implication on decentralization comprised of local autonomy, self-government, self-reliance, the will of the people, and mission transfer. Second, the practice of the decentralization discourse in terms of policy implementation in various laws and regulations for local administration according to local administration process was stipulated by the central authority Third, the resultant local administration had to say that the more such approaches or regulations were adopted for local administration, the less the local autonomy will it become. The acceptance and practice's impact on the erosion of local administrative autonomy took place as a patronage power relation between the central authority and the locality.
Comparative Analysis of Local Government Units in Southeast Asian Nations
Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the organizational structures, financial capacities, citizen engagement mechanisms, technology utilization, and common challenges faced by Local Government Units (LGUs) across Southeast Asian nations. Drawing insights from a diverse range of scholarly works, including books, theses, published dissertations, and electronic journals, the research investigates key dimensions that shape local governance dynamics in the region. The investigation into organizational structures delves into the nuances of centralization vs. decentralization, federal structures, hierarchical frameworks, policy harmonization, and community engagement practices. The study uncovers how these structural variances impact the efficiency and effectiveness of local governance. Examining financial capacities and resource management practices, the research reveals substantial differences among LGUs in terms of the system of government and the subdivision of state. This prompts a call for tailored fiscal policies and collaborative initiatives to optimize resource utilization and financial autonomy. Citizen engagement mechanisms emerge as a focal point, with a notable emphasis placed on fostering inclusive decision-making processes. The study finds a high commitment to citizen involvement within Southeast Asian LGUs, urging continued support for transparent and responsive local governance. Technological adoption and digital strategies come under scrutiny, highlighting disparities, diverse adoption rates, and an increasing embrace of digital communication strategies. Recommendations include addressing digital divides and promoting comprehensive digital strategies for efficient public service delivery and citizen engagement. Finally, the study explores common challenges faced by LGUs in Southeast Asian nations, such as corruption, political dynamics, and capacity constraints. It underscores the interconnected nature of these challenges, emphasizing the need for holistic solutions and comprehensive reforms to strengthen governance structures. This research contributes to the existing literature by synthesizing insights from various sources, providing a nuanced understanding of local governance in Southeast Asia. Policymakers, researchers, and practitioners can leverage these findings to inform strategic interventions, foster collaboration, and promote effective governance practices across the region.
THE EFFECTS OF DECENTRALIZATION ON PERIPHERAL DEVELOPMENT AND MODERN STATE FORMATION IN THE PHILIPPINES, 2018
Decentralization, as a concept, posits two core dimensions: one that is administrative in nature, commonly known as deconcentration and another that is political in nature, also known as devolution; in both cases, there is a dispersal of power or authority from the center (Brillantes 1987). In the Philippines, decentralization has been adopted as a tool for development administration, dating back all the way to the beginning of last century. With the West’ direction of modernity towards economic growth and development that promotes democracy as a principle for governance, thus “decentralized power” becomes a fundamental principle in almost every nation state in the world. Yin and Lucas (1973), following the United States’ history of decentralization, cite that to foster development, one of the challenges the economy must overcome is alienation. To reduce the alienation of regions outside Manila, decentralization must encourage participatory governance from the local government units (Yin and Lucas 1973). As decentralizing the public services instigates political autonomy from the peripheries, ideally it reduces their economic stagnation, further reinforcing democracy. Thus, the ideal practice of decentralization must also be an invocation of democracy through an active participatory local government. However, such freedom also perpetuates political dynasties. And with such encroachment, it questions the success of decentralization in forwarding democracy and development of the Filipino people coming from the peripheries. Nonetheless, the employment of a western framework signifies the role of decentralization in advancing the Philippine state towards modernity. It is with these notions in mind that the researchers want to address the following questions: has decentralization been effective in upholding its own goals? Is there a need to accelerate the course of decentralization by way of a federal form of government? Must decentralization be viewed as an extreme end, or must it be considered in the manner of a spectrum (opposite to centralization)? Lastly, is there a need to accelerate the course of decentralization by way of a federal form of government?
Decentralization and delivery of public services in Asia
Policy and Society, 2013
Impact of decentralization on public service delivery is mixed. A meta-analysis of the studies suggests that impact of decentralization on public service delivery is contingent on factors such as the design of the decentralization policy; implementation bottlenecks and diluting the model of decentralization for accommodating the dissenting segments of stakeholders including employees; and participatory governance. In particular decentralization has resulted in improvements in delivery of local services where devolution as a mode of decentralization is accompanied by sound financial resource base of local governments, full autonomy to local governments in HRM matters, regular capacity building of local officials, performance based incentive structures, and participatory governance. In contrast where either truncated model of decentralization is adopted or the original model is diluted in favour of centralisation particularly in the form of imposition of central personnel policies, th...
Administrative Decentralization and Bureaucratic Reform: India and Indonesia. 1
2014
The paper compares the broad outlines of decentralization taking place in India, dating from the last decade of the past century, with that of Indonesia in the first decades of the present one. When appropriate, material from China will be included in the essay. Of the usual subjects of political, administrative, and physical decentralization, the center of focus is on the generally acknowledged least successful in terms of reform, i.e. the civil administration. What the approach lacks in specific details concerning administrative decentralization in the respective republics, it makes up for in the emphasis on the key characteristics of each. Moreover, as public administration tends to reflect the individual countries" prevailing norms, such an approach tends to be influenced by a new range of literature and researchers whose views challenge accepted wisdom and inspire new lines of thinking on the subject. Justification for the approach comes from expectations that cross fertil...