DIPLOMATIC ENGAGEMENT AND NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT BETWEEN PHILIPPINES AND CHINA: A CONSTRUCTIVE-REALIST APPROACH IN POST-ARBITRATION (original) (raw)
Related papers
Common Security in the Asia-Pacific Region
The Pacific Review, 1992
This paper considers ways in which ideas and assumptions about 'defensiveness' and territorial defence (including at sea), often associated with the broader concept of common security, figure in the Asia-Pacific regional conversation about future security arrangements and the resolution of regional security problems.
Alternative realities: Explaining security in the Asia-Pacific
Review of International Studies, 2017
The central argument of this article is that constructivists in particular underestimate or even ignore the importance of the 'real' structural inheritance that shapes state (and the political elites that represent them) behaviour. Even though the future is indeterminate, some outcomes are decidedly more likely than others, especially where policymakers believe they inhabit a strategic universe of zero sum outcomes and where self-reliance and assertion remain important. I suggest that 'critical realism' offers a way of accounting for the institutional structures that shape international behaviour. The first half of this article makes the case for a critical realist approach. The second half illustrates the possible importance of this claim with reference to the contemporary geopolitics of the Asia-Pacific region.
Olga Barbasiewicz, Marcin Grabowski, Ewa Trojnar (eds.), Security Dilemmas and Challenges in 21st Century Asia, Peter Lang Verlag, Berlin 2020, 2020
Security dynamics in Asia in the 21st century has been a widely discussed phenomenon. The rising power of China, its impact on neighboring countries and the international system, as well as its reception by the United States, have been of key importance to the development of security and international studies. As a result, this monograph analyzes the current security challenges in Asia in its broader i.e. Indo–Pacific meaning, aiming at capturing major shifts in the balance of power which involve regional actors. Through the lenses of IR theory, we have sought to provide insights into the consequences of the transition of power from the United States to China. By presenting case studies of regional security challenges from a multidimensional perspective, we analyze both the stages of the maturity of powers and their satisfaction within the existing system. Therefore we find it significant to discuss the role of regional actors who are hedging their bets between the United States and China, as well as different security dimensions and problems reshaping the regional architecture.
China and the Tension in the South China Sea: A Defensive Realist Perspective
Over the past five years, China’s behaviour in the South China Sea (SCS) has been described as assertive, aggressive or even abrasive by many scholars. Certainly, the majority of scholars, both in the West and China, suggest a shift in China’s behaviour in the region from that of the previous period in the aftermath of the 1995 Mischief Reef Incident. This paper aims to offer an explanation for the tension in the SCS from a defensive realist perspective. The main proposition is that a situation of illusory incompatibility exists among claimants in the SCS, which leads to a security dilemma. Moreover, this paper also suggests that China possesses sufficient resources to mitigate the tension in the SCS. However, for a number of reasons, it does little to initiate reassurance towards other claimants in the SCS. In the near future, tension will continue in the SCS, unless significant change takes place in the factors that render China reluctant to initiate reassurance. Keywords: China S...
Security Dilemma in the South China Sea: Escalating Tension between Great Powers
South China Sea (SCS) has been a disputed area for decades due to its strategic economic and politic geographical location. Different states have been claiming different, sometimes overlapping, parts of the region because the sea contains rich natural resources. However, the tension of the region has been escalating more recently due to the increasing need of energy resources, especially after the World War II. Therefore, claimants have been acting increasingly more aggressive in order to reinforce their claims. The two great powers, United States and China, has also been extremely involved in the disputes. Considering that both states have interests within the region, an increase of militarization in order to pursue those interests have been done. Analyzing the condition through the theory of security dilemma, the rise of one's power in order to pursue security will cause threat for the other. Therefore, the other party will tend to balance out the power by also increasing their own security. This is the condition currently happening in the SCS. The militarization of the SCS which at first was done to improve security of the region bites back in the form of insecurity.
Resolving the Security Dilemma.
The security dilemma represents the most salient existential conundrums within International Relations Theory. The uncertainty characterized by the security dilemma is a product of multiple material and psychological phenomena with the most important of them being the possession of weapon systems alongside the anarchical nature of the International State System. The former, by serving as 'inherently ambiguous symbols' make it impossible for decision makers to safely distinguish between 'offensive' and 'defensive' capabilities of other states. While the latter, amplify the pervasive condition of existential uncertainty felt by one set of decision makers when trying to ascertain the motives of decision makers of other states through a psychological dynamic referred to as the 'Other Minds Problem'. Cumulatively these processes represent what Wheeler and Booth refer to as the existential condition of unresolvable uncertainty that together exert tremendous influence upon the decisions made by states forcing them to 'err on the side of caution'1 when deliberating upon the motives and intentions of other states. After evaluating the examples of fatalist and mitigator logics through engaging with theorists belonging to both the offensive and defensive realist camp the essay contrasts both positions with the transcender logic advocated by Wendt theory of social constructivism. Ultimately the analysis concludes that the growth of international institutions such as the UN and the increasing interconnectedness of economic and societal relations across the world under the auspices of globalization have provided a perfect forum within which to create a degree of predictability within the international sphere. When this predictability is institutionalised into a set of deeply embedded norms it can serve as a pacifying element within interstate relations and potentially offer an escape from the insecurity mandated by the dilemma. The security dilemma represents the most salient existential conundrums within International Relations Theory. The importance of concept to the field is articulated succinctly by Booth and Wheeler who assert that the dilemma cuts to the 'very heart of politics among nations: the existential