Paper and Reviewer of the Year Award Winners (original) (raw)
2013, American Journal of …
AI-generated Abstract
Members of the editorial staff and board of the American Journal of Public Health recognize the significant contributions of the 2014 Paper and Reviewer of the Year award winners. The awards celebrate a published paper that has made noteworthy advancements in public health understanding or policy and a reviewer who has exemplified outstanding dedication and constructive feedback in the peer-review process. Notably, the highlighted research demonstrates critical findings regarding solitary confinement impacts on jail inmates, with implications for mental health policies. The nominations emphasize the importance of ethics, quality reviews, and their impact on future research and practices in public health.
Related papers
Rebuttal to the letters to the editors by Terry et al. and Sewell et al. regarding
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2020
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2017
This editorial reflects on some of the challenges of journal publishing in a context of increasing time pressures and accountability measures in academia. A particular focus is that of the demands on reviewers and the challenges of recognising their contributions. This editorial also introduces the eleven diverse papers that consitute the issue. Finally, the editorial acknowledges the work of the edorial team and welcomes Associate Professor Petrea Redmond as a Lead Editor.
Thanks to Our Guest Editors and Reviewers for Their Critical Contributions in 2010
2011
The editors identify and select these reviewers based on their demonstrable and recognized research expertise, professional experience, critical judgment and foresight, and forward thinking in their field of expertise. We express our deepest appreciation to these guest editors who have created special topical issues of JTST published in 2020, and to these reviewers, all of whom have completed manuscript reviews during 2020. Thank you all for giving generously of your valuable time and expertise.
Authors’ Response to the Reviewer Comments
2018
We sincerely thanks to the reviewers for their comments on the manuscript and offering their suggestions and critical input that has helped improve the manuscript. We provide here our replies to the reviewers’ comments and highlight the changes made in the revised manuscript based on the comments. These have been incorporated in the manuscript as follows. The point wise replies of the comments of the Reviewer#3 are given below.
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2018
As our first issue for 2018 it is timely to provide some bibliometrics on the recent performance of the journal. The bibliometric data in this editorial provide readers with information about the journal’s publication, review and article access statistics, the articles attracting the most interest over the past year and the citation performance of the journal. Overall, the journal continues to strengthen its position with high quality submissions and an increasing trend in citation impact factors.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.