Exploring Indigenous Social Attitudes and Priorities in Australia (original) (raw)
2012, Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues
Given significant government attention to, and expenditure on, Indigenous equity in Australia, this article addresses a core problem: the Jack of a sound understanding of Indigenous social attitudes and priorities. An account of cultural theory raises the likelihood of difference ih outlook between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people, including those making and implementing policy. Yet, years of scholarly research and official statistical collections have overlooked potentially critical aspects of lndigineity. Suggestions of difference emerge from reference to the 2007 Australian Survey of Social Attitudes (AuSSA). If the attitudes recorded for a small sample in this instrument manifest in the Indigenous population at large, policy priorities and directions should be reviewed and possibly revised. Despite inherent methodological difficulties, the article calls for targeted social attitude research among Australia's Indigenous peoples so that future policy can be better oriented and calibrated. The national benefits would outweigh the costs via better directed policy making.
Related papers
On the Contemporary Position of the Indigenous Peoples of Australia
2005
This paper highlights the contemporary disadvantaged position of Indigenous peoples of Australia. ∗ It discusses a number of data quality issues on Indigenous data, before examining Indigenous disadvantage across five key areas: (1) education; (2) employment; (3) housing and living conditions; (4) health and wellbeing; and (5) crime and justice. Given the call for all governments to implement a framework to overcome Indigenous disadvantage, we recommend that future research begin with an investigation of nonIndigenous attitudes towards, and knowledge of, the position of Indigenous peoples in Australia. This is essential towards developing an understanding of the general public’s current perceptions of Indigenous peoples’ position in Australia, particularly where the development of policies pertaining to
Public Policies toward Aboriginal Peoples: Attitudinal Obstacles and Uphill Battles
Canadian Journal of Political Science , 2015
This paper examines public attitudes towards aboriginal policy in Canada, focusing on evidence from two surveys conducted in Saskatchewan, a province with a large and growing Aboriginal population. We show that although non-Aboriginals are collectively divided on Aboriginal public policies, expressing considerable support for some, but strong reservations when it comes to others; the individual-level evidence indicates that there is a single Aboriginal policy agenda in the minds of non-Aboriginal Canadians. Support for, and opposition to, the priv- ileging of Aboriginal claims is structured in part by prejudice toward outgroups but also by non- Aboriginal people’s more general position on the role of government in society. Moreover, the impact of positions about the role of government in society on attitudes toward Aboriginal policies is moderated by people’s level of political sophistication: the more educated and politically interested they are, the greater the impact of those ideological views
In this exploratory paper I will proffer a series of reflections as preparatory material for policy formation that, hopefully, could be used to address inequality in general, and, more particularly, but not specifically, this differential aspect as observed in the context of Australian Indigenous Life-Worlds. This differential deficit in the latter is known in Australia as 'The Gap'. 1 'Closing the Gap' has been the preoccupation of numerous recent governments, both on Federal and State levels, and which, collectively, and overall, it could be argued, have had very little to show for their accumulative efforts; especially in the light of the quantum of resources given to its proposed amelioration and closing. 2 In one recent set of policy directives (in the policy area of health) this was tentatively projected as occurring around 2030? However, the current rate of progress is such that this goal could not be realistically realized given those policies already in place as they stand! In the light of such past and current failures it is obvious that innovative approaches to this question need to be seriously re-explored; preferably by the chief stakeholders in these indigenous life-worlds in consultation with those policy professionals able to successfully expedite the formation of policy redirection that is found to be better able to realize this important political imperative.
Indigenous welfare policy: lessons from a community survey
Agenda, 2002
[Extract] Although Indigenous Australians only represent two per cent of the Australian population, they have a high profile in the community as the original inhabitants of the continent and because of the problems associated with their poverty, dispossession ...
An Australian Indigenous Advancement Agenda
Public Affairs Quarterly
This paper distills arguments by Indigenous public intellectual Noel Pearson in support of an “uplift” agenda for remote Australian Aboriginal communities suffering corrosive disadvantage and intergenerational dysfunction. Pearson draws on Amartya Sen while prioritizing personal responsibility, and attempts a synthesis of liberalism, social democracy, and capabilities building. The present paper also draws on Martha Nussbaum’s and Rutger Claassen’s capabilities approaches, with points of resonance and/or agreement with Pearson’s arguments highlighted. Under a charitable reading, Pearson’s position is defensible against prevailing criticisms, including the criticism that his responsibility emphasis leads him to misunderstand and misapply Sen’s capabilities theory, and that his policies are illiberally perfectionist and paternalistic, ultimately assimilationist, and in breach of Kant’s humanity principle.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.