Media Oversight in Non-Democratic Regimes: The Perspectives of Officials and Journalists in China (original) (raw)
Related papers
Pacific Journalism Review : Te Koakoa
This project captured and analysed Chinese strategies seeking to influence global media in its coverage of China. While there is ample literature defining some of these strategies, there is a lack of empirical data tracking the strategies in practice. The project addressed this by surveying officials from journalism unions in 87 countries on their perceptions of Chinese influence on the media in their country. The surveys were complemented by focus groups with senior journalists and editors in six countries. The findings illustrated how China’s global media outreach policies have grown increasingly sophisticated and how the country utilises a multi-pronged approach to influence global media. Dukalskis’ (2017) authoritarian public sphere (APS) framework was used to conceptualise the studies and to analyse the findings. It is argued that China is attempting to offer its APS as an alternative to the traditional Habermasian (1989) public sphere.
Media, Democracy and Globalization: A Comparative Framework
Javnost the Public, 2001
The differences within and between Western and Eastern democracies are so significant that the concept of multiple democracies is proposed. To most of the developing world, democratisation is transculturation a process by which Western democracy is transformed for self-aggrandisement. In the age of globalisation, the media are potentially important sources of international and domestic referencing. Media and democratisation are mutually reinforcing, one being constituted by the other. The roles of the media in a society are very much defined by its mode of media control, which varies mainly with its power structure. With concentrated power, the media tend to demote democracy; the opposite is true when equity reigns. Based on a mixed use of inducements and constraints in media control, four modes of state-press relationships are identified: laissez faire, repression, incorporation and co-optation. Each ideal type entails certain media roles that have important implications for democratisation. Media can perform both positive and negative functions in regard to democracy, depending on the prevailing mode of power distribution and specific social and organisational contexts. Each mode of media control and the corresponding media roles may shift as power is restructured. Media usually assume a more emancipatory role as the power structure becomes more decentralised.
Comparing media systems in new democracies: East meets South meets West
2008
Th e paper presents a comparative framework for understanding the emerging media systems in so-called third-wave democracies. Th ree pathways of democratization are distinguishedfrom communist oligarchy in Eastern Europe, from military dictatorship in Latin America, and from one-party dictatorship in Asia and Africa. Following Hallin & Mancini's approach the paper then discusses for each of these pathways the particular patterns of transition of media markets, state-media relationships, political parallelism, and journalistic professionalism. Th e paper concludes by arguing that Western models of media systems cannot be easily applied to new democracies. Instead, new hybrid forms of political communication are emerging that blend liberal ideals of a free press with the trajectories of the past, indigenous values and the constraints and experiences of transition.
This article uses cosmopolitanism as a theoretical basis for the investigation and analysis of the global corporate and state media’s normative roles in human rights and democracy. Through the case studies of CNN and Xinhua’s reportage of the Tibetan protests in 2008, the article observes patterns of ideological coalescence between western capitalist hegemony and the big western media conglomerates such as CNN. It argues that, as a good global corporate citizen, CNN undoubtedly made contributions in exposing human rights abuses in Tibet, but also unwittingly worked to advance the interests of a manipulative and unjust neoliberal international order that uses human rights as a political tool. This is demonstrated not only through CNN’s selective articulation of human rights, but also the worrying coincidence between its ideological construction of the Tibet story and the rebuke of China’s human rights record by the western governments and other western institutions. While Xinhua provided an alternative discourse to that of human rights, it was observed that whereas nationalism arguably protects China’s revolutionary legacy and its modernization project, the discourse was also largely authoritarian and acted in contradiction to some of the constitutionally entrenched civil and political liberties of minorities while also raising cynicism about the Chinese government’s commitment to international human rights laws that it ratified and acceded to.
Key Words media and democracy, media ownership, media markets, citizen information, national media systems I Abstract There is much debate about the effects of media market deregulation and the resulting growth of vast global media corporations. Some observers argue that deregulatory pressures have undermined public service broadcasting and media social-responsibility norms, resulting in deterioration of information quality and political disengagement of citizens in many nations. Others herald deregulatory trends as expanding information choices and enabling citizens to find their preferred levels of political engagement. This analysis proposes that we understand global trends in media deregulation as part of a transnational political regime in which many players and institutional arenas shape norms for media ownership, social responsibility, and citizen information. The players include multinational corporations, parties and public officials, interest associations, and citizen advocacy organizations. The institutional settings include national legislatures and regulatory commissions as well as international trade organizations, European Union commissions, and United Nations agencies. The outcomes of contests among these players at different institutional levels influence the degrees of normative consensus on ownership and content policies in the regime and explain how different nations engage with media deregulation and the market forces that increasingly shape the content of democratic public life.
International Journal of Social Science and Education Research , 2022
Media and communication play an important role in the contemporary society with the acceleration of globalization. Under the influence of media and communication, citizens from various countries begin to connect with each other, which in turn gives rise to the content from non-Western countries occupying an increasingly critical position in the global media landscape. These media contents from non-Western countries are defined as contraflows. China Global Television Network (CGTN), as an important news media from non-Western countries, is a typical representative of the contraflows and plays a key role in promoting the transformation of traditional global media. Based on the globalization theory, contraflow theory, and public sphere theory, this paper conducts a critical analysis of CGTN, focusing on its overseas expansion, reporting strategy, and localization, probing into its influence on the global media landscape dominated by Western media outlets. This paper argues that CGTN, as a non-Western news media with increasing global influence, is challenging the traditional global media landscape dominated by Western news outlets, and its global influence is mainly driven by rapid overseas expansion, balanced and objective reporting strategy, and a high degree of localization.
Book Review: Political Regimes and the Media in Asia by Sen and Lee, 2008
A review of an important book on politics and the media in Asia. The review highlights the place of Sen and Lee's book in the overall discipline of Media, Culture and Society. According to the reviewer, underpinning the essays in the book is the call to revisit Asia in the light of the aftermath of 9/11, when the Western media’s “unqualified support for a free media” came under massive revision (p.1). Recent scholarship (not mentioned in the book), by Miller (2006) asserts that since 9/11, the mainstream US media has become, in the service of the nation, a baying scourge of the truth. Therefore, if the US media has been shown to maintain popular and public support by challenging the legitimacy of its opponents, surely, the argument goes, Asian governments who typically control media for their own purposes, will now have every reason to continue in their draconian ways. This book follows this line of thinking but produces facts and figures to strengthen, as well as contradict this implicit thesis.
The Media and Democracy in China and Taiwan
This essay offers a comparison of the media in the People's Republic of China and Taiwan within the context of the processes of regime transition in Asia, and argues that this comparison is meaningful only if we avoid a state-centred approach. The discussion contrasts the prevailing authoritarian-style management of the media in China with the liberalization and market competition that characterizes the media landscape in Taiwan. Asking if Taiwan offers a model for eventual democratization of China's media, the essay explores the problems associated with the style of journalism that Taiwan has adopted, and considers whether market forces really are a panacea for the customary problems of democracy. Asia is a media landscape in transformation. As new democracies emerge and old authoritarian political systems cling desperately to power, the media are playing an increasingly active and significant role as political agents. As the instruments of popular mobilization and responsive politics, the media can both promote and support regime change and democratic consolidation; equally, they can be the apparatus of political authoritarianism, helping to preserve a reactionary style of government. 1 Asia is a particularly exciting and appropriate case study as the region provides the opportunity to observe the organization and behavior of the media in multiple socio-political contexts with diverse histories of media practice