An Examination of the Geography of Three Major Contenders for Columbus's First Landfall, in 1492 (original) (raw)

At its simplest level the landfall debate can bc broken down into three separate elements: the transAtlantic crossing; the nature of the landfall island; and the passage from Guanahani to Cuba. It is the intcntion of this study to confine itself to the geographical issues relevant to the first landfall, but including thc navigation and seaman_ ship involved in approaching it. The three islands undcr investigation are San Salvador (once called Watlings Island) Samana Cay (once called Atwood Cay) and Grand Turk (Figure 1). In this instance the first issue conccrns the navigational approach to the island, and the first sightings of land from the sea. Wc are told that Columbus approached Guanahani at night, stcering a westerly course,r and thcre is reason to believe the wind was from the east or north east. They saw the land about 5-6 miles away at night, and according to Oviedo, many islcts *ere seen about Guanahani, and they were called White islands because of their appearance.

Sign up for access to the world's latest research.

checkGet notified about relevant papers

checkSave papers to use in your research

checkJoin the discussion with peers

checkTrack your impact

New Research Supports a Modification of Samuel Eliot Morison’s Theory Concerning Columbus’s Inter-Island Route Through the Bahamas

This is the author's original manuscript now published in Terrae Incognitae The Journal of Thr Society for the History of Discoveries published by Taylor and Francis, 2017

Abstract: Christopher Columbus’s first voyage to the Americas may qualify as history’s most significant exploration. Despite this imposing status, debate persists regarding the first four islands visited during the month of October 1492. A myriad of studies have provided a multitude of possibilities, seemingly ad nauseam. That said, there is a need to revisit this debate. For seven decades many historians have concluded that Samuel Eliot Morison has provided the most cogent theory regarding the identity of these islands. Those same decades have led to complacency regarding the many inconsistencies between Morison’s theory, information provided by Columbus’s log, and the actual geography of the Bahamas. New resources are applied in an attempt to resolve these inconsistencies. They provide alternative interpretations to several passages within the Las Casas transcription of Columbus’s log. Although continuing to support a number of Morison’s conjectures, these alternative interpretations reject Morison’s choice of Rum Cay as Columbus’s second island, instead supporting Samana Cay for that position. This proposed change to Morison’s theory, of itself, is not as important, however, as it is to continuously challenge historical theories that appear incomplete or incorrect.

Columbus to Acosta: Science, Geography, and the New World

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 128.62.59.252 on Fri

A List of Works that Attempted to Identify Christopher Columbus's Landfall island

A List of Works that Attempted to Identify Christopher Columbus's Landfall island, 2023

Numerous attempts have been made to identify the first island visited by Christopher Columbus on his first voyage to the New World. This list was created to help with another paper and is posted here in hopes that others may find it useful.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

Luca Codignola, review of Peter Edward Pope, The Many Landfalls of John Cabot, Toronto, Buffalo, New York: University of Toronto Press, 1997: in The William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd ser., LVII, 3 (July 2000), pp. 660-662, ISSN 0043-5597