Angelaki Journal of the Theoretical Humanities NUCLEAR THEORY DEGREE ZERO, WITH TWO CHEERS FOR DERRIDA (original) (raw)
Related papers
Nuclearism: The Contours of a Political Ecology
How are we to comprehend those events that muscle their way into shaping the manner in which we understand them? On the assumption that the May 1998 Indian nuclear tests constitute one such event, I attempt in this essay to evince the means of such a comprehension. Toward this tantalizing objective, I find a useful start in the following witticism from Ashis Nandy's response to the tests: "The culture of nuclearism is one of the true 'universals' of our time. Like Coca-Cola and blue jeans, it does not permit cultural adaptation or edited versions. It is the same in Paris and Pokharan, Lahore and Los Alamos." 1 There are several levels to Nandy's comment: It is about nuclear technology; it is about culture; but it also is about technology and culture, technology as culture, and technologies of culture. More generally, then, Nandy obliges us to pay attention to a certain exemplary interfacing of technology and culture-"the culture of nuclearism" -against its concomitant geopolitics, which disallows "cultural adaptation or edited versions."
The unsustainable legacy of the Nuclear Age
arXiv: Popular Physics, 2018
It is seldom acknowledged the tremendous burden that the Nuclear Age leaves on future generations, and the environment, for an extremely long time. Nuclear processes, and products, are activated at energies millions of times higher than the energies of chemical processes, and consequently they cannot be eliminated by the natural environment on Earth. So it turns out that hundreds of nuclear tests performed in the atmosphere left a huge radioactive contamination; Rosalie Bertell estimated 1,300 millions victims of the Nuclear Age; civil nuclear programs have produced enormous quantities of radioactive waste, whose final disposal has not been solved by any country; decommissioning of tens of shut down nuclear plants shall involve costs which were underestimated in the past; spent nuclear fuel accumulates in decontamination pools, or in dry cask storage, but no final storage has been carried out yet; radioactivity of spent fuel will last for tens of thousand years; military nuclear pro...
The Smoke of Nuclear Modernity Drifts through the Anthropocene
2016
Working with the nuclear economy and nuclear aesthetics is a complex ethical process, one that twists and turns through spirals of technical jargon, nuclear utopianism and deep psychic fear. In this culture of extremes, artists engaging with contemporary nuclear culture walk a political tightrope interrogating how nuclear aesthetics are reproduced whilst avoiding the simplifying tropes of industry and activism. In parallel to artistic practices, this essay explores some of the constructions of nuclear modernity, and the means of escape and betrayal, which contribute to rethinking nuclear aesthetics in the early twentieth century.
Journal of International Political Theory
This Introduction presents the seven closely interlinked papers that explore the theme of this Special Issue, and one of the enduring existential questions for International Relations: the nuclear condition in the twenty-first century. The Special Issue is the second to come from two workshops sponsored by a UK Leverhulme grant, and it builds upon the first, more theoretical Special Issue, which brought Classical Realist and Critical Theory texts into dialogue. The major concern in the first Special Issue—the focus on modernity, crises, and humanity—is taken up here in more grounded practical terms, framed around the existential fears of nuclear annihilation. Each of the contributions re-assess the contemporary nuclear condition from within the theoretical frameworks provided by Classical Realism and Critical Theory. The engagement with both traditions allows the contributors to diagnose what is new, and what remains constant, in the contemporary nuclear condition.
NUCLEAR DARKNESS: The Inner Story (2022)
Now we are at the edge of a nuclear conflagration, perhaps a few words about what vast opportunity we missed because of our blind insistence in ignoring any possibility of powers greater than the human will at work in shaping the destiny of the world. This essay, companion to my The Meaning of the Bomb as World Destroyer, (see https://www.academia.edu/35453625/The\_Meaning\_of\_the\_Bomb\_as\_World\_Destroyer\_2014\_) tells the inner story of nuclear power, i.e. the story of our first encounters with the soul aspect or inward meaning of nuclear power and how a future possibility for us and the world was thwarted by our sheer stubbornness in privileging power and control over all else. We have missed that opportunity and now our destiny has become our fate. Instead of transformation of life on Earth we face instead utter destruction of everything.
Myths, symbols, society and nuclear energy
International Journal of Nuclear Governance, Economy and Ecology, 2012
Today, can we really ascertain whether Humanity has effectively derived more good than evil from the discovery of radioactivity a century ago? The answer hinges on the judgement that we and our fellow-citizens make about the impact of the applications of nuclear physics, by reference to a number of fundamental values: the concern to preserve our planet, its inhabitants and its environment; the need to avoid the risk of conflicts; and the guideline of the development of all peoples. At the collective level, an ethic must enable every social group, every nation and, perhaps, humanity, to form a community of behaviours. This places us at the very heart of the nuclear debate.
Editorial Introduction: The Politics of Nuclear Techonology in the Twenty-first Century
St Antony's International Review, 2009
The Frisch-Peierls memorandum of March 1940 must rank as one of the most significant historical documents of the twentieth century for students of international relations. Otto Frisch and Rudolph Peierls, two refugee scientists fleeing the German Nazi regime, arrived in Britain in 1940 and set about alerting the British government to the imminent danger of nuclear technology. Using their knowledge of the activities of German scientists, the memorandum warned the British government that Germany sought to construct a nuclear device -the only logical deterrence to which, they argued, would be a British nuclear weapon. The enormity of what the two scientists were proposing was not lost on them, for the brief memorandum discussed not only the scientific feasibility of the device, but also the strategic and ethical dimensions to the existence of such a weapon in the hands of governments. 1 Their prescient warning serves as a foreword to debates that continued during the cold war period and have remained relevant in our post-cold war era. The Frisch-Peierls memorandum set in motion events that would come to define the strategic balance of the contemporary era.