AYNEL MESHADIYEVA. Critical analysis of the views of turkologists on the etymology of some Turkic secondary adverbial participles // Science. Education. Practice: materials of the International University Science Forum (Canada, Toronto), May 27, 2020. - Infinity Publishing, pp. 70-81 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Participles in the Turkic Languages and Dialects
Researchers World : Journal of Arts, Science and Commerce, 2016
This paper investigates the future participle-acak/-ecek in the Turkic languages and dialects. Presently, a series of questions concerning an etymology of the future participle-acak/-ecek in the modern Turkic languages does not have a due and exhaustive treatment in the Turkology. In the meantime, similar and distinctive features of the future participle-acak/-ecek in the Turkic languages were revealed. The relevance of the paper is conditioned by the fact that similar and distinctive features of linguistic phenomena in specific languages could be identified precisely due to the comparative-historical analysis.
This paper investigates phonetic and morphological-semantic features and the main functions of the future participle –ası/-esi in modern Turkic languages. At the present time, a series of questions concerning an etymology of the future participle –ası/-esi in the modern Turkic languages does not have a due and exhaustive treatment in the Turkology. In the course of the research, similar and distinctive features of the future participles –ası/-esi in Turkic languages were revealed. It should be noted that comparative-historical researches of the grammatical elements in the modern Turkic languages have gained a considerable scientific meaning and undoubted actuality. The actuality of the paper's theme is conditioned by these factors.
ABSTRACT of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Science, 2021
The need to study non-personal forms of the verb in the Turkic languages is determined by the role they play in the sentence both independently and in combination with other forms and auxiliary verbs, expressing various kinds of temporal and modal shades of action. Comparative study of certain structural elements and grammatical categories in the considered languages is of great scientific importance. The comparative-historical method, as it is known, is one of the leading methods used in comparing the facts of Turkic languages and contributes to the further development of various fields of linguistics. Comparative and historical study of various Turkic languages is the most important and necessary task of modern Turkology. The need for this study, first of all, is dictated by the fact that only the use of comparative-historical methods can more deeply penetrate into the essence of linguistic facts and their connections. Thus, the comparative-historical analysis of non-personal forms of the verb in the Turkic languages will allow a deeper under-standing of their nature as the most extensive class in the verb system. In addition, a systematic and comparative historical study of the composition, meanings and functions of non-personal verb forms in these languages will reveal both their similar and distinctive features.
How Can We Define “Participles” in Mongolic Languages? : Two Problems in Shinekhen Buryat
Proceeding of the 1st Conference on Central Asian languages and Linguistics (at Indiana University, 2014-05-16). This paper aims to examine the function of “participles (or also called as “verbal nouns”)” in Shinekhen Buryat (SB; one of the Mongolic languages) and to suggest the following two points: 1) It seems to be difficult to define the prototypical participles in SB as inflectional verb > adjective transposition; 2) we should recategorize the participles in SB. In SB, Some of the participles are more verbal and more inflectional. These are “participles” of the inflectional paradigm of verbs. On the other hand, the other forms are less verbal and less inflectional, i.e., more derivational. We should categorize those suffixes into syntactic derivational suffix. We can find the same problem about participles on the other Altaic languages. Participles in Altaic languages are different from those in Indo-European languages on their verbal properties. It would be important for not only linguistic description, but also for language-teaching to examine the function of each “participle” found on previous grammar. Keywords: participles, verbal nouns, inflection, derivation, Mongolic languages.
The Turkic Languages edited by Lars Johanson and Éva Á. Csató
The Turkic Languages, 2022
The Turkic Languages is a reference book which brings together detailed discussions of the historical development and specialized linguistic structures and features of the languages in the Turkic family. Seen from a linguistic typology point of view, Turkic languages are particularly interesting because of their astonishing morphosyntactic regularity, their vast geographical distribution, and their great stability over time. This volume builds upon a work which has already become a defining classic of Turkic language study. The present, thoroughly revised edition updates and augments those authoritative accounts and reflects recent and ongoing developments in the languages themselves, as well as our further enhanced understanding of the relations and patterns of influence between them. The result is the fruit of decades-long experience in the teaching of the Turkic languages, their philology and literature, and also of a wealth of new insights into the linguistic phenomena and cultural interactions defining their development and use, both historically and in the present day. Each chapter combines modern linguistic analysis with traditional historical linguistics; a uniform structure allows for easy typological comparison between the individual languages. Written by an international team of experts, The Turkic Languages will be invaluable to students and researchers within linguistics, Turcology, and Near Eastern and Oriental Studies.
On some future tense participles in modern Turkic languages
2016
This paper investigates phonetic and morphological-semantic features and the main functions of the future participle-ası/-esi in modern Turkic languages. At the present time, a series of questions concerning an etymology of the future participle-ası/-esi in the modern Turkic languages does not have a due and exhaustive treatment in the Turkology. In the course of the research, similar and distinctive features of the future participles-ası/-esi in Turkic languages were revealed. It should be noted that comparative-historical researches of the grammatical elements in the modern Turkic languages have gained a considerable scientific meaning and undoubted actuality. The actuality of the paper's theme is conditioned by these factors.
Turkic Languages 15 (2011) 1 I am on the editorial board of this journal
2011
The journal TURKIC LANGUAGES is devoted to linguistic Turcology. It addresses descriptive, comparative, synchronic, diachronic, theoretical and methodological problems of the study of Turkic languages including questions of genealogical, typological and areal relations, linguistic variation and language acquisition. The journal aims at presenting work of current interest on a variety of subjects and thus welcomes con tributions on all aspects of Turkic linguistics. It contains articles, review articles, re views, discussions, reports, and surveys of publications. It is published in one vo lume of two issues per year with approximately 300 pages.