(2020), Humanist compatibilism. A proposal for reconciliation between neuroscience and criminal law», in Journal of Organizational Psychology (22) 3, pp. 1-17 | ISSN: 2158-3609. (original) (raw)

Neuroscience, free will, and criminal responsibility

stephen morse

Free Will and the Brain

View PDFchevron_right

Does neurobiological determinism entail the end of criminal responsibility?

Frédéric Gilbert

Applied ethics: Life, environment and society, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Neurobiological determinism: Human freedom of choice and criminal responsibility

Astrid Rossegger, Jérôme Endrass

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Responsibility Between Neuroscience and Criminal Law. The Control Component of Criminal Liability

Sofia Bonicalzi

Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Determinism and the Death of Folk Psychology: Two Challenges to Responsibility from Neuroscience

stephen morse

Minnesota journal of law, science & technology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

The tyranny of the Organism. Criminal liability between anthropology, morality and neuroscience

Pietro Schirò

HISTORIA ET IUS , 2023

View PDFchevron_right

Neuroscience, Justice and the 'Mental Causation' Fallacy

John A Humbach

2019

View PDFchevron_right

Neuroscience and Mens Rea Jurisprudence: Implications of the Philosophical Problem of Free Will and Determinism1

Ikenga K E Oraegbunam

View PDFchevron_right

Neuroethics: Should We Rethink Free Will and Criminal Responsibility?

Frédéric Gilbert

Proceedings of the Third International Conference in Applied Ethics, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Criminal law, neuroscience, and voluntary acts

Dennis Patterson

Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Critical Psychology and the Brain: Rethinking Free will in the Legal Context

chetan sinha

Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2024

View PDFchevron_right

Responsibility and punishment: whose mind? A response

Oliver Goodenough

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

The Place for Neuroscience in Criminal Law

Deborah W Denno

View PDFchevron_right

Neuroética. Cómo Hace Juicios Morales Nuestro Cerebro [Neuroethics. How Does Our Brain Make Moral Judgements]. Lidia Feyto Grande (Plaza y Valdés, 2019)

Júlia Pareto Boada

2021

View PDFchevron_right

We are More Than our Executive Functions: on the Emotional and Situational Aspects of Criminal Responsibility and Punishment

Federica Coppola

Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Neuroscience and law: a possible (and useful) agreement

Santo Di Nuovo

“L’invenzione della realtà” (ed. E. Coco) Publisher ETS, 2022

View PDFchevron_right

NeUroethics Neuroscience

Theodoros Pitikaris

2014

View PDFchevron_right

Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments

Georgia Martha Gkotsi

View PDFchevron_right

Neurocorrection. On the use of neurodevices for criminals

Stefano Fuselli

Teoria e Critica della Regolazione Sociale / Theory and Criticism of Social Regulation, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Law, Responsibility, and the Sciences of the Brain/Mind

stephen morse

Oxford Handbooks Online, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Neurolaw and Punishment: a Naturalistic and Humanitarian View, and its Overlooked Perils

Andrea Lavazza

Teoria, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Looping effects of neurolaw, and the precarious marriage between neuroscience and the law

Toma Strle, Olga Markic

Balkan Journal of Philosophy, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Neuroscience and the Personalization of Criminal Law

Deborah W Denno

University of Chicago Law Review, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Integrating Neuroscience in Criminal Law: The Dutch Situation as an Example

paul mevis

International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Responsibility Beyond Blame: Unfree Agency and the Moral Psychology of Criminal Law's Persons

Craig Reeves

Criminal Law's Person (Lernestedt and Matravers (eds.)), (Oxford: Hart) , 2022

View PDFchevron_right

6 The Neurosciences and Criminology: How New Experts Have Moved into Public Policy and Debate

Peter Becker

View PDFchevron_right

On the Potential of Neuroscience: A Comment on Greene and Cohen’s "For the Law, Neuroscience Changes Nothing and Everything

Theodore Blumoff

bepress Legal Series, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Book review: Minds, Brains and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience

Nicklas Lundblad

SCRIPTed, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Criminal Behavior and the Brain: When Law and Neuroscience Collide

Deborah W Denno

View PDFchevron_right

Responsible Brains: Neuroscience, Law, and Human Culpability

William Hirstein, Tyler K Fagan

2018

View PDFchevron_right

Criminal Law and Neuroscience: Theory and Practice in the Italian Perspective

Grandi Ciro

International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 2022

View PDFchevron_right

Journal of Cognition and Neuroethics

Marcela Herdova

2015

View PDFchevron_right

Neuroscience, Cognitive Psychology, and the Criminal Justice System

Deborah W Denno

Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Contributions from Neuroscience and Biology to the Philosophy of Law

Hugo de Brito Machado Segundo

UNIO - EU Law Journal - 1st. Edition (peer reviewed), 2015

View PDFchevron_right

The limits of the neuroscience of moral responsibility

Daniel de Vasconcelos Costa

ethic@ - An international Journal for Moral Phylosophy , 2021

View PDFchevron_right