original ) (raw )Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labor in Women with Low-Risk Pregnancies: A Prospective Study
trA GIANG
Medical Archives, 2022
View PDFchevron_right
COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF INTRACERVICAL FOLEYS CATHETER BALLOON WITH INTRACERVICAL PROSTAGLANDIN E2 GEL (DINOPROSTONE) FOR INDUCTION OF LABOUR.
IJAR Indexing
International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Double balloon catheter versus vaginal prostaglandins for induction of labor: an observational ambidirectional cohort study
Anna Ramos de Luis
Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal
View PDFchevron_right
Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial
Franck Perrotin
PLOS Medicine, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial
Sally Tracy
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Patient satisfaction with the cervical ripening balloon as a method for induction of labour: a randomised controlled trial
George Yeo
Singapore medical journal, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial
Hubertina Scheepers
The Lancet, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel and dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor at term
Jonathan Schaffir
Primary Care Update for OB/GYNS, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis
Zvi Vaknin
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
A prospective study on comparison of effectiveness and safety of dinoprostone intracervical gel and dinoprostone vaginal insert on induction of labour
Farzana Ahmed
International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2022
View PDFchevron_right
Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial
Mukhri Hamdan
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics, 2022
View PDFchevron_right
Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature
Nico Schuitemaker
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel and Extra-Amniotic Foley's Catheter for Induction of Labour
Radha garg
INDIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Effectiveness of dinoprostone vaginal pessary in induction of labour at term
devdatt pitale
International journal of reproduction, contraception, obstetrics and gynecology, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Dinoprostone Gel versus Intra-cervical Foley’s Catheter for Pre-induction Cervical Ripening: An audit
Prachi Renjhen
Indonesian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
View PDFchevron_right
Role of Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel Administration versus Vaginal Administration of Oral Prostaglandin E2 Tablet for Induction of Labour
tapasi pati
2015
View PDFchevron_right
Role of Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel Administration versus Vaginal Administration of Oral Prostaglandin E 2 Tablet for Induction of Labour L Research
satyabhama marandi
2015
View PDFchevron_right
Observational Study of Neonatal Safety for Outpatient Labour Induction Priming with Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert
Geoffrey Cundiff
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Labor induction with prostaglandin E 1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: A randomized trial
luis ramos
Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial
ahmet eser
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score ≤ 4
Federico Prefumo
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
To Compare the Efficacy of Intra Cervical Foley’s Catheter with Intra Cervical Dinoprostone Gel in Cervical Ripening for the Successful Induction of Labor
Mamta Choudhary
International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of Labor with Vaginal Dinoprostone (PGE2) in Patients with a Previous Cesarean Section: Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes
Nuria López Jiménez
Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
VBAC In Women Undergoing IOL With Dinoprostone Versus Spontaneous Labor
Claudia Tomás
The Internet journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
Efficacy and safety of prostaglandins vs double balloon catheter in inducing labor: a meta-analysis
ayendra Fernando
International journal of reproduction, contraception, obstetrics and gynecology, 2020
View PDFchevron_right