The Language of Romanian Politics: Reifying the Other (original) (raw)
Related papers
THE POWER OF LANGUAGE IN THE ROMANIAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE
Land Forces Academy Review, 2023
The impact of communication upon political activities is inevitable, regardless whether we refer to socialization, participation, the establishment of an agenda, mobilization or negotiation. Every political activity is influenced by communication inasmuch as almost all such manifestations involve the use of a form of communication. The assertion of a moral and professional authority's competence and credibility is increasingly rivaled by media credibility or by the charisma, whose importance is admitted by journalists and image counselors. Thus, it is by means of their aggressive discourse that most of the Romanian political leaders have built up this 'charisma'. In a period of crisis and shortcomings, who could wish to see faded characters, deprived of personality, on television? In Romania, not revolting against 'someone' and not opposing them are equivalent to being unaware of the people's sufferance and, therefore, one cannot be a good leader.
Illiberal Discourse in Romania: A “Golden” New Beginning?
Politics and Governance
While interest in illiberalism has increased in recent years, the study of the connections between anti-gender discourse and transnational dissemination is a more recent scholarly endeavour. Emerging feminist scholarship has helped to move beyond national cases of illiberalism to understand how the gendered nature of illiberalism is revealed through its ability to cross borders and, in recent years, to become a movement with a transnational character. This article examines the evolution of the political discourse on gender in Romania and proposes a three-stage framework leading from gender traditionalism to a more pronounced illiberal discourse. The article examines whether the recent rise of the political party Alliance for the Union of Romanians (Alianța pentru Unirea României, AUR) represents a new step towards an established political illiberal discourse in Romania. The official public addresses of AUR are analysed to show how the terminology and themes identified as cornerstone...
Political Manichaeism in Contemporary Public Debates: The Romanian Case
Southeastern Europe= L'Europe du Sud-Est, 2003
One is often tempted to think that, once modernization of political institutions and procedures has been achieved, old mentalities and ancient mental habits are somehow bound to disappear, being 'happily' (even if gradually) replaced by new attitudes and inclinations: one feels that a new (modernized) political practice cannot fail to eliminate the main part of the system of anachronistic mentalities, since the latter is both inadequate (in the new context) and incompatible (with the former).
2017
In its endeavour to legitimate power, political communication seeks to convince the electorate, in every possible way and on every possible occasion and, while doing so, it resorts to different linguistic strategies. The presence of myths and metaphors seems to have flourished in today's political discourse, probably due to the numerous political crises that have erupted lately at an international level. This article aims to address a few of the linguistic characteristics of political myths and metaphors, mostly from a theoretical point of view, trying at the same time to establish a connection between the two, regarding the creation of political realities and practices through language.
The Strategy of Counterattacking in Romanian Political Discourse
2009
The purpose of the present article is to provide an analysis of the Romanian political discourse; more precisely, we focus on the televised debate organised with a view to presidential elections. We intend to show how political actors attempt to reverse the attacks directed at them by applying a retaliatory strategy, one of launching an even stronger attack themselves. In order to do that, they always start by using the opponent’s discourse tactic, developing it so as to appear in a good light and undermine the interlocutor’s position.
Our article represents a short analysis of the literature from ideological point of view during Communist regime in Romania. Taking into consideration the complexity of this topic, we focused particularly on the first stage of the communism. After 1944-1945, the process of sovietisation and satellisation has just begun in Central and Eastern Europe. The Romanian Communist Party and its internal allies managed to seize power. After that, the Romanian society underwent radical transformations. It is also the case of the culture and literature. They both suffered total changes, being influenced by the Soviet pattern. We can perceive a total metamorphose of Romanian literature. The literature, like the historiographical discourse, turned into a docile and very useful tool for propaganda and Communist ideology. So, in this period the literature became profoundly ideologized. As a consequence, we notice the poor quality of literary texts. We resorted to a theoretical approach, explaining the main concepts. We identified and analysed the main differences between socialist realism and proletcultism. We underscored the principles and characteristics of the socialist realism insisting on its anti-cosmopolitanism. Actually, in Romanian People’s Republic, we had a different type of anti-cosmopolitanism, not similar to that from U.S.S.R.
Comparative Southeast European Studies
Using the methodology of discourse theory, this chapter aims to analyse how Romanian society evolved after 1989 with special regard to the tension between direct and representative democracy. The author's main hypothesis is that in time the absence of the demos from the actual decision-making process fuelled a rhetoric based on direct democracy, and that beginning in 2004 that rhetoric succeeded in establishing itself as a hegemonic discourse. To test the hypothesis, the author uses the logical framework of discourse theory, analysing the constitutive modalities of the rhetoric about democracy and the people, paying close attention to the tensions that have arisen between direct and representative democracy and charting the sociocultural background of those tensions. He uses the methodological arsenal of discourse theory, focusing on its five key arguments. Finally, he suggests a series of preliminary conclusions derived from his analysis .
This paper analyzes differences in the legitimation strategies used by, and on behalf of the two presidential candidates in the elections of December 2004 in Romania, using a combination of Critical Discourse Analysis and pragma-dialectics. These differences are seen to lie primarily in the varieties of populist discourse that were drawn upon in the construction of legitimizing arguments for both candidates: a paternalist type vs. a radical-authoritarian, anti-political type of populism. I relate the success of the latter type to more effective strategic manoeuvring in argumentation, part of more effective branding strategies in general, but also to existing types of political culture amongst the electorate and to social, economic circumstances. I also argue that, in the Romanian context at the end of 2004, a variety of otherwise fallacious populist electoral messages were perceived as reasonable and acceptable, as fitting adjustments to the situation and as means of optimizing the deliberative situation of the electorate.
2013
From a discourse analysis standpoint, the contemporary administrativist approach and the discursive perspectives on the concept of "public interest" were brought together by Jacques , as the deconstruction of discourse provides the researcher with the opportunity to identify the meaning or the purpose of discourse, having as starting point the meanings assigned by society to specific words or concepts. Consequently, the priority axis of our analysis revolves around the intentionality of political discourse, based on the assumption that the three basic elements (cf. Derrida) of discourse are intention, method and ideology, with public interest being a prerequisite for the democratic public sphere. The issue of discourse intentionality is the subject of pragmatic approach, as intentionality essentially defines the manner in which a discourse agent represents a specific matter (cf. ; it is thus understood in the context that the force of representation is intrinsic to the intentionality process of speech acts. The second core dimension specific to our study encompasses the social conditions which characterise the use of words/concepts, and the role played by the latter in determining discourse effectiveness, starting from the paradigm of illocutionary force (cf. J.-P. Austin, 1969Austin, , 1975 as well as from the significance of discourse context in relation with the paradigmatic competences of "the language of institution" or "authorized language" (cf. P. Bourdieu, 1975Bourdieu, /2001. In practical terms, our study is concerned with the occurrences and manners of (re)presentation which are specific to the syntagm "public interest" in the context of deliberative discourse; thus, our study comprises an analysis of the political debates in the joint meetings of the Parliament of Romania between January-December 2012 -i.e. 24 meetings -and seeks to identify operational definitions for the syntagm concerned.