NATO-Russia Council 2013: Crisis Committee Resolution on the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict (original) (raw)
Related papers
In Limbo: Russia's Policy in the Nagorniy Karabakh Conflict
European Security & Defence, 2018
As a strategic ally of Armenia, a strategic partner of Azerbaijan, and co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group, Russia has become (and it has been viewed as) the most active external actor in the NK conflict settlement process. However, these three dimensions, combined with various geopolitical challenges, significantly complicate Russia's interaction with the direct parties to the NK conflict.
Analyzing Russia’s Interests in the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh Ceasefire Agreemen
Jurnal Hubungan Internasional
The Nagorno-Karabakh war has been one of the most important conflicts in the South Caucasus. The two nations involved, Azerbaijan and Armenia, have been in conflict more times than in cooperation ever since their independence from the Soviet Union. The territory disputed, Nagorno-Karabakh, has been internationally recognized as Azerbaijan’s since the United Nations General Assembly Resolution in 2008. However, this did not stop the conflict, as seen with the newest escalation happening in September of 2020. In the majority of the conflict, Russia has been a constant presence, being a mediator as well as a military supplier to both countries. Russia also has been involved in peacekeeping efforts, sending peacekeeping forces to Nagorno-Karabakh. In November 2020, a ceasefire agreement was reached involving Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Russia. This paper aims to examine Russia’s interest in its involvement in the conflict, the weaknesses of the ceasefire agreement, and Russia’s gains from ...
The Failure of The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Resolution
Politička misao
The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict began in 1988 after the regional Supreme Council declared the transfer of the region from the Azerbaijani SSR to the Armenian SSR. The full-scale war started in 1992 after the dissolution of the USSR and ended with the May 1994 armistice. In the following quarter century, a peaceful resolution of the conflict was mediated by OSCE’s Minsk Group in a form of facilitative mediation. The warring sides have never reached a final solution and a new war started in the autumn of 2020. This paper examines how facilitative mediation was conducted by the Minsk Group and why it eventually failed. The conclusion of this paper is that the combination of the weak mandate and the co-chairs’ separate and incongruous interests in the Caucasus resulted in the failure of the conflict resolution in Nagorno-Karabakh.
Russia’s Main Strategy for the Nagorno-Karabakh Issue
After the deterioration of relations between Russia and the West, and some disruption to Russia’s efforts to influence Ukraine’s European and NATO political course, the Kremlin activated its policy in the Caucasus and Caspian Sea region. The main goal of Putin’s policy is to preclude the political influence and activity of Western powers in unsettled conflicts like Nagorno-Karabakh between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The Kremlin’s purpose is to marginalize and to distance itself from the OSCE Minsk Group initiatives.
Nagorno-Karabakh: Toward Stalemate or Settlement?
Russia and Eurasia Review, The Jamestown Foundation, 2003
Since the 1994 cease-fire, the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh has been frozen. International mediators proffered a variety of peace proposals, yet no tangible results have been achieved. The peace process led by OSCE's Minsk Group has thus far failed to provide an effective mechanism to buttress a settlement, while each conflicting side insists that the other meet its primary requirement before discussion of any other issue.
OSTWEST Monitoring, 2023
RUSSIA USED THE KARABAKH CONFLICT AS A BARGAINING CHIP TO ADVANCE ITS GEOPOLITICAL INTERESTS. Published in English, Armenian, Russian and German. In the aftermath of the military offensive and ethnic cleansing of Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh in September 2023, Azerbaijan seized control of the capital Stepanakert and demolished the de facto state that had existed for the last three decades. The status quo policy of Armenia and its reliance on Russia for security did not save Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia from the 2020 war and its consequences. Russia missed the opportunity to save its face, once more choosing further advancement of its geopolitical interests instead of the protection of the rights and security of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians. Russia also lost the trust of its ally Armenia, which is apparently leading to transformation in its foreign and security policies.