Limitation Periods and the Theory of Unjust Enrichment (original) (raw)

Yale Journal of International Law, 2019

The Modern Law Review, 1984

The Disparities in Section 3, Hearsay-Admissibility Rules and the Negative Effects the Consent Clause in Section 3(1)(A) Has on the Accused Whose Representatives Agree to the Admission of Hearsay Evidence to Prove a Case Against Their Clients

PROF MAMPOLOKENG M A T H U S O M A R Y - E L I Z A B E T H MONYAKANE

Obiter

View PDFchevron_right

Destructive Rules of Certainty and Efficiency: A Study in the Context of Summary Judgment Procedure and the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits

Amy Ronner

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 1995

View PDFchevron_right

Lost in Translation? The Difference Between the Hearsay Rule's Historical Rationale and Practical Application

Robson Crim

Manitoba Law Journal 42(4), 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Smith, Bailey and Gunn on the Modern English Legal System

Jane Ching

2002

View PDFchevron_right

Adjudication and the Law

Timothy Endicott

View PDFchevron_right

Alternative to What? Theories of Litigation, Procedure and Dispute Settlement in Anglo-American Jurisprudence: Some Neglected Classics

William Twining

The Modern Law Review

View PDFchevron_right

The Puzzling Purposes of Statutes of Limitation

Tyler Ochoa

Pac L J, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

Remarkable Stratagems and Conspiracies": How Unscrupulous Lawyers and Credulous Judges Created an Exception to the Hearsay Rule

Marianne Wesson

2007

View PDFchevron_right

JURISPRUDENCE [ Legal Theory ] Class-room live lectures edited, enlarged and updated Msrlawbooks

Tania Bhowal

View PDFchevron_right

The Impact of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 on the Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence: Has the Act Ignored the Risks Traditionally Associated with Hearsay Evidence and Marginalised the Defendant's Right to a Fair Trial

Daniel Stylianou

View PDFchevron_right

Malicious Prosecution Laws and its Evolution in England and USA

International Res Jour Managt Socio Human

View PDFchevron_right

Federal Adjudication of Facts: The New Regime, 12 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 437 (1989)

Allen Kamp

1989

View PDFchevron_right

The Disorder of Law: A Critique of Legal Theory. By Charles Sampford [Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 1989. x, 283 and (References and Index) 17pp. Hardback £25.00 net.]

David Howarth

The Cambridge Law Journal, 1990

View PDFchevron_right

Jurisprudence- final 20160101 all

Man Ting Christie LAM

View PDFchevron_right

Rationing Criminal Procedure: A Comment on Ashworth and Zedner

Stuart Green

Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Procedural models and fair trial rights 2010 (49) The Supreme Court Law Review 277

Pamela Schwikkard

View PDFchevron_right

Trial Court Budgets, the Enforcer\u27s Dilemma, and the Rule of Law

Anup Malani

2014

View PDFchevron_right

Epistemic injustice in criminal procedure

Andrés Páez

Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal 9(1), 11-38, 2023

View PDFchevron_right

Comments on strict application of the "Exclusionary rule" in American jurisprudence and non-application in Sri Lanka

Piumi Tillekerathne

View PDFchevron_right

The Trial-Time/Forum Principle and the Nature of Evidence Rules

Alex Stein

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

The Historical Continuity of Punitive Damages Awards: Reforming the Tort Reformers

Michael Rustad

The American University law review, 1993

View PDFchevron_right

The Pursuit of Truth in Contemporary Civil Procedure: Revival of Accuracy or a New Balance in Favour of Effectiveness?

Alan Uzelac

View PDFchevron_right

A return to first principles in unjust enrichment: Kerr v. Baranow

Mitchell McInnes

2011

View PDFchevron_right

Editorial of dossier “Epistemic Injustice in Criminal Procedure”

Janaina Roland Matida

Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 2023

View PDFchevron_right

Constitutional review of Disproportionately Different Periods of Limitation of Actions (Prescription)

Matthias E. Storme

European Review of Private Law

View PDFchevron_right

Legal Inquiry and Legal Arguments

claudio michelon

SSRN Electronic Journal

View PDFchevron_right

Questioning the Undefended Accused Practical Examples for Magistrates

Jameelah Omar

Faculty of Law, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Improving the Potential of Tort Law for Redressing Historical Abuse Claims: The Need for a Contextualized Approach to the Limitation Defence

Elizabeth Adjin-Tettey

2011

View PDFchevron_right

The Law's Delay

cornelis hendrik (remco) van rhee

View PDFchevron_right

Civil Procedure: Part 24-How Real Is a Real Prospect of Success

Jane Ching

Nottingham LJ, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

THE CLOCK TURNED BACK FOR THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EXTRA CURIAL HEARSAY ADMISSIONS AGAINST A CO-ACCUSED IN CRIMINAL CASES

Murdoch M Watney

View PDFchevron_right

Revisiting the Application of the Ten Year General Period of Limitation: Judicial Discretion to Disregard Art 1845 of the Civil Code

Andualem Lema

2015

View PDFchevron_right

Limitation Periods and the Theory of Unjust Enrichment (original) (raw)

Related papers