The Good, the Bad, and the Burger Court: Victims' Rights and a New Model of Criminal Review (original) (raw)
The Good, the Bad, and the Burger Court: Victims' Rights and a New Model of Criminal Review, 75 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 363 (1984)
Timothy O'Neill
2021
View PDFchevron_right
Criminal Justice in the Supreme Court: A Review of United States Supreme Court Criminal and Habeas Corpus Decisions
Laurence Benner
Cal. WL Rev., 2000
View PDFchevron_right
State High Courts, State Constitutions, and Individual Rights Litigation since 1980: A Judicial Survey
John Kincaid
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs, 1986
View PDFchevron_right
ISSUES AND OUTCOMES IN STATE SUPREME COURT JUDICIAL REVIEW CASES
Carol Traut
Southeastern Political Review, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
“Stop Me Before I Get Reversed Again”: The Failure of Illinois Appellate Courts to Protect Their Criminal Decisions from United States Supreme Court Review, 36 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 893 (2005)
Timothy O'Neill
2005
View PDFchevron_right
Realigning Habeas Corpus: How Brown v. Davenport Attempts to Balance Habeas Relief with Federalism
Jackson A Lanier
North Carolina Central Law Review, 2023
View PDFchevron_right
How the Supreme Court Delivers Fire and Ice to State Criminal Justice
Ronald F. Wright
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
View PDFchevron_right
Adjudicated on the Merits?: Why the AEDPA Requires State Courts to Exhibit Their Reasoning, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 995 (2006)
Ezra Spilke
The John Marshall law review, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Judicial Review by the Burger and Rehnquist Courts
Rorie Solberg
Political Research Quarterly, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
How State Supreme Courts Take Consequences Into Account: Toward a State-Centered Understanding of State Constitutionalism
Neal Devins
62 Stanford Law Review 1629 1693, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
John Adams Made Me Do It"*: Judicial Federalism, Judicial Chauvinism, and Article 14 of Massachusetts' Declaration of Rights
Joseph Grasso
2000
View PDFchevron_right
Supreme Irrelevance: The Court's Abdication in Criminal Procedure Jurisprudence
Ross Berlin
2018
View PDFchevron_right
The Proportionality Review of Capital Cases by State High Courts after "Gregg": Only "The Appearance of Justice"?
leigh bienen
The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 1996
View PDFchevron_right
Quality of Justice in Capital Cases: Illinois as a Case Study, The
leigh bienen
Law and Contemp. Probs., 1998
View PDFchevron_right
The Quality of Justice in Capital Cases: Illinois as a Case Study
leigh bienen
Law and contemporary problems, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Federal Question Jurisdiction: The Compass, the Maze and the Trap
Simona Grossi
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
The New Judicial Federalism Before Its Time: A Comprehensive Review of Economic Substantive Due Process Under State Constitutional Law Since 1940 and the …
Anthony Sanders
bepress Legal Series, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
The Limits of Federal Judicial Power over the State: The Eleventh Amendment and Pennhurst II
Thomas Bridge
1985
View PDFchevron_right
Of Innocence and Innocents: The Supreme Court and Mens Rea Since Herbert Packer
Douglas Husak
Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 1999
View PDFchevron_right
Waiver of Constitutional Issues in Criminal Cases: Confusion in the Illinois Supreme Court, 11 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 55 (1990)
Timothy O'Neill
1990
View PDFchevron_right
Stare Decisis and the Supreme Court(s): What States Can Learn from \u3cem\u3eGamble\u3c/em\u3e
Zachary Pohlman
2020
View PDFchevron_right
Michigan v. Chesternut and Investigative Pursuits: Is There No End to the War Between the Constitution and Common Sense?
Rachel Van Cleave
Hastings Law Journal, 1988
View PDFchevron_right
Foreword: The Seventh Circuit as a Criminal Court: The Role of a Federal Appellate Court in the Nineties
adam kurland
Chicago Kent Law Review, 1991
View PDFchevron_right
Supreme Court's Prisoner Dilemma: How Johnson, RLUIPA, and Cutter Re-Defined Inmate Constitutional Claims, The
Michael Keegan
Neb. L. Rev., 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Executions in America: How Constitutional Interpretation Has Restricted Capital Punishment
Andrea Paone
2011
View PDFchevron_right
Federal Courts' Supervisory Authority in Federal Criminal Cases: The Warren Court Revolution that Might Have Been
Bruce Green
2019
View PDFchevron_right
Wainwright v. Sykes: The Lower Federal Courts Respond
Saul Goodman
1979
View PDFchevron_right
Brief of Law Professors, Timothy P. O'Neill, et al as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner-Appellee Addolfo Davis, People v. Davis, 6 N.E.3d 709 (Illinois Supreme Court 2013) (No. 115595)
Timothy O'Neill
2013
View PDFchevron_right
Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. By Laura Langer. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002. 192p. 62.50cloth,62.50 cloth, 62.50cloth,20.95 paper
Rorie Solberg
American Political Science Review, 2002
View PDFchevron_right
Examining the Power of Federal Courts to Certify Questions of State Law
Jonathan Nash
Cornell L. Rev., 2002
View PDFchevron_right
Federal Courts: Choice of Law: Refusal to Apply State Limitation to Federally-Created Right
Paul Tractenberg
Michigan Law Review, 1962
View PDFchevron_right
Judicial Integrity, the Appearance of Justice, and the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus: How to Kill Two Thirds (or More) with One Stone
Ira Robbins
Am. Crim. L. Rev., 1977
View PDFchevron_right
U.S. v. Clinesmith: Amicus Brief in Support of Motion for Relief Under The Crime Victims' Rights Act
James R. Marsh
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020
View PDFchevron_right
The Supreme Court's Actual Innocence Problem
Nathan Goetting
Discourse Magazine, 2022
View PDFchevron_right
In the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Mohan Harihar
View PDFchevron_right