Realigning Habeas Corpus: How Brown v. Davenport Attempts to Balance Habeas Relief with Federalism (original) (raw)
Judicial Integrity, the Appearance of Justice, and the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus: How to Kill Two Thirds (or More) with One Stone
Ira Robbins
Am. Crim. L. Rev., 1977
View PDFchevron_right
Criminal Justice in the Supreme Court: A Review of United States Supreme Court Criminal and Habeas Corpus Decisions
Laurence Benner
Cal. WL Rev., 2000
View PDFchevron_right
Adjudicated on the Merits?: Why the AEDPA Requires State Courts to Exhibit Their Reasoning, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 995 (2006)
Ezra Spilke
The John Marshall law review, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Federal Habeas Corpus
Kevin Clermont
1970
View PDFchevron_right
Habeas Review of Perfunctory State Court Decisions on the Merits
Scott Dodson
American Journal of Criminal Law, 2002
View PDFchevron_right
The Good, the Bad, and the Burger Court: Victims' Rights and a New Model of Criminal Review
Timothy O'Neill
The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 1984
View PDFchevron_right
The Good, the Bad, and the Burger Court: Victims' Rights and a New Model of Criminal Review, 75 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 363 (1984)
Timothy O'Neill
2021
View PDFchevron_right
Criminal Prosecutions Affecting Federally Guaranteed Civil Rights: Federal Removal and Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction to abort State Court Trial
Anthony Amsterdam
University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1965
View PDFchevron_right
Federal Courts & Federal Rights
Gordon Young
1979
View PDFchevron_right
Supreme Court's Prisoner Dilemma: How Johnson, RLUIPA, and Cutter Re-Defined Inmate Constitutional Claims, The
Michael Keegan
Neb. L. Rev., 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Habeas Corpus, Writ of
Cary Federman
The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America: An Encylopedia, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
Waiver of Constitutional Issues in Criminal Cases: Confusion in the Illinois Supreme Court, 11 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 55 (1990)
Timothy O'Neill
1990
View PDFchevron_right
Hudson v. McMillan: The Eighth Amendment Gets a Push and a Shove
Bina Sanghavi
Loy. U. Chi. LJ, 1992
View PDFchevron_right
Reviving Hugo Black? The Court's 'Jot for Jot' Account of Substantive Due Process
Toni Massaro
New York University Law Review, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
The Theories of Federal Habeas Corpus
Evan Lee
Washington University law quarterly, 1994
View PDFchevron_right
Note, Unenumerated Rights – Substantive Due Process, the Ninth Amendment and John Stuart Mill
George Garvey
1971
View PDFchevron_right
Wainwright v. Sykes: The Lower Federal Courts Respond
Saul Goodman
1979
View PDFchevron_right
Liberty is Not Loco-Motion: Obergefell and the Originalists' Due Process Fallacy
Andrew Bodoh
campbell law review, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Taking Prisoners' Rights Seriously on Substantive Habeas Corpus Review
Ian C Davis
Canadian Journal of Human Rights, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
\u3cem\u3eTennessee v. Garner\u3c/em\u3e and the Democratic Practice of Judicial Review
Steven L Winter
1986
View PDFchevron_right
The Constitutional Right to Collateral Post-Conviction Review
Carlos Manuel Vazquez
2016
View PDFchevron_right
Section 2254(d) of the New Habeas Statute: An (Opinionated) User's Manual
Evan Lee
Vanderbilt Law Review, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
The Resilience of Substantive Rights and the False Hope of Procedural Rights: The Case of the Second Amendment and the Seventh Amendment
Renee Lerner
Social Science Research Network, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Book Review: The Body and the State: Habeas Corpus and American Jurisprudence (2008)
Fleur Johns
Social & Legal Studies, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Executions in America: How Constitutional Interpretation Has Restricted Capital Punishment
Andrea Paone
2011
View PDFchevron_right
Racial Justice and Federal Habeas Corpus as Post-Conviction Relief from State Convictions
LeRoy Pernell
SSRN Electronic Journal
View PDFchevron_right
State High Courts, State Constitutions, and Individual Rights Litigation since 1980: A Judicial Survey
John Kincaid
CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs, 1986
View PDFchevron_right
Webster and the future of substantive due process
James Bopp
Duquesne law review, 1990
View PDFchevron_right
Due Process as Choice of Law: A Study in the History of a Judicial Doctrine
Matthew Steilen
William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Sheppard v. Maxwell (Supreme Court, 1966) [Conviction Reversed with Instructions]
Tom Clark
1966
View PDFchevron_right
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
Mohan Harihar
View PDFchevron_right
“Stop Me Before I Get Reversed Again”: The Failure of Illinois Appellate Courts to Protect Their Criminal Decisions from United States Supreme Court Review, 36 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 893 (2005)
Timothy O'Neill
2005
View PDFchevron_right
HABEAS CORPUS: THE GREAT WRIT KEVIN W. BAKER GOV. 4913-09 INDEPENDENT STUDY PROFESSOR JEFFERY ROBB, J.D. TEXAS WOMAN'S UNIVERSITY SPRING 2014
kevin W baker
View PDFchevron_right
Section 2254(d) of the Federal Habeas Statute: Is It Beyond Reason?
Evan Lee
Hastings Law Journal, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
The New Judicial Federalism Before Its Time: A Comprehensive Review of Economic Substantive Due Process Under State Constitutional Law Since 1940 and the …
Anthony Sanders
bepress Legal Series, 2005
View PDFchevron_right