Journal of Controversies in Biomedical Research - the Need of the Hour (original) (raw)

Reproducibility of biomedical research: Quo vadis?

Antonio Bernad

Medicina Clínica (english Edition), 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Criteria for Peer Reviewing the Original Articles Submitted to a Biomedical Journal: Intellectual Honesty is the Best Policy

Bishnu Hari Paudel

Journal of Nepal Medical Association, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Preliminary guideline for reporting bibliometric reviews of the biomedical literature (BIBLIO): a minimum requirements

Ali Montazeri

Systematic Reviews, 2023

View PDFchevron_right

Publication of Clinical Trials in Scientific Journals: Editorial Issves

Javier Bermejo

Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Reproducibility of biomedical research – The importance of editorial vigilance

Stephen Bustin

Biomolecular Detection and Quantification, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Rigor and Transparency Index, a new metric of quality for assessing biological and medical science methods

Martijn Roelandse

2020

View PDFchevron_right

Endorsements of five reporting guidelines for biomedical research by journals of prominent publishers

Peiling Wang

PloS one, 2024

View PDFchevron_right

No Study is Ever Flawless: A Scoping Review of Common Errors in Biomedical Manuscripts

Shahram Sedghi

Accountability in Research, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Editorial research and the publication process in biomedicine and health: Report from the Esteve Foundation Discussion Group, December 2012

Fèlix Bosch-Llonch

2014

View PDFchevron_right

biomedicine journal

shashi kumar

View PDFchevron_right

Prevalence and Prevention of Reproducibility Deficiencies in Life Sciences Research: Large-Scale Meta-Analyses

Nadine Lotfy

Medical Science Monitor

View PDFchevron_right

Improving the reliability of peer-reviewed publications: We are all in it together

Tania Nolan

Biomolecular Detection and Quantification, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

The new BMJ policy on sharing data from drug and device trials

Trish Groves

BMJ (Online), 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Securing reliability and validity in biomedical research: an essential task

Thomas Wilckens

Drug Discovery Today, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

The reproducibility crisis in scientific research

Sarah Eline

2019

View PDFchevron_right

Analysis of Retraction Watch Database for Retractions Due to Errors in the Clinical Science Reproducible Research Pipeline: A Scoping Review Protocol

Eric Whitley

2020

View PDFchevron_right

Changing trends with respect to standard of methodological reporting and type of research published in a pharmacology journal over a decade: a descriptive study

Sunita Ramanand

International Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Reproducibility Policies in Cardiology Journals: The REPLICA Cross-Sectional Study

Lucas Helal

View PDFchevron_right

Protect us from poor-quality medical research

Arne Sunde

Human Reproduction, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

A brief note on Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. A strategy to reduce wasted biomedical research

Arturo Martí-carvajal

CientMed, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature

Daniel Rolnik

PLoS biology, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

On the Proposed Changes to the Credibility Gap in Industry-Supported Biomedical Research: A Critical Evaluation

Leemon McHenry

Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Publication bias in clinical research

To Ja

1991

View PDFchevron_right

JAMA Peer Reviewers in 2004

Mitchell Barnett

2016

View PDFchevron_right

Development of ARCADIA: a tool for assessing the quality of peer-review reports in biomedical research

José Antonio González Alastrué

BMJ Open

View PDFchevron_right

The JAMA Peer Review Report for 2000

george anstadt

JAMA, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Rebuttal to the letters to the editors by Terry et al. and Sewell et al. regarding

Minne Heringa

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

A 30 year perspective of the quality of evidence published in 25 clinical journals: Signs of change?

Simon Robinson

Postgraduate Medical Journal, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Report of the independent panel considering the retraction of two articles in The BMJ

Curt Furberg

BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Review and Analysis of Publication Trends over Three Decades in Three High Impact Medicine Journals

ashok prasad

PLOS ONE, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

How to publish biomedical research in “non-predatory” journals: a discussion and notes from experts

Kuat Oshakbayev

Journal of Clinical Medicine of Kazakhstan

View PDFchevron_right

Reviewers' Responses to Medical Research Articles

Saba Sohail

Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Agreement in reporting between trial publications and current clinical trial registry in high impact journals: A methodological review

Daniel Ming Yi Shi

Contemporary clinical trials, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

204221WoodcockGood Publication Practices in Clinical Pharmacology: Transparency, Evidence-Based Medicine and the 7-D Assessment* by Barry G. Woodcock and Veronika Luger

Barry Woodcock

View PDFchevron_right

Better Reporting of Scientific Studies: Why It Matters

J Clark

PLoS Medicine, 2013

View PDFchevron_right