Ting, S. H., & Musa, M. K. (2013). Genres apart: University and school writing. Issues in Language Studies, 2(1), 24-37. (original) (raw)
Related papers
From generic writing skills, the teaching of academic writing has moved on to value socialisation of university students into academic norms and practices. However, the development of academic literacies is dependent upon the students' prior knowledge of academic writing and the inculcation of awareness of academic writing norms peculiar to the discipline or field. The study examined students' preparedness for academic writing at university by surveying the kinds of writing done in secondary school in the Malaysian education system. The specific aspects examined were the prevalent types of academic writing in secondary school, the focus of teacher feedback to essays written in English, and the nature of academic writing required in university writing assignments. The survey of school writing involved 235 students enrolled in English courses in two Malaysian universities and the analysis of university writing tasks was across faculty in the universities. The results indicated that the main types of writing done in school were expository writing and narratives whereas the university writing encompasses expositions, explanations and classification essays. In addition, the emphasis in school essays was grammatical accuracy and general writing skills rather than shaping of text content to suit the communicative purpose and the context in which the language is used. The survey highlights the conceptualisations of academic writing that needs to be addressed before dealing with the particularities of contextual and social meanings in academic writing.
Academic writing practices constitute central processes through which students learn the conventions of their disciplines to meet the expectations of their academic communities. Therefore, academic writing courses should touch on the specific dimensions of it. One of the most prominent requirements of these courses is to identify the needs of students and implement a program based on the negotiation between the needs of students and the expectations of academic communities. The present study aimed to explore the academic writing needs of Turkish postgraduate students in the departments of English Language Teaching and English Language and Literature through an online questionnaire including Likert-type items and open-ended questions. The Likert-type items were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples t-test statistics while the data gathered from open-ended questions was exposed to thematic analysis. We found that the participants (30 Turkish postgraduate students of English) obtained a clear idea of the disciplinary conventions and the importance of communication with readers in academic genres but they did not seem to develop awareness of building stance in academic genres. There was not a statistical difference between MA and PhD students' academic writing needs. Apparently, academic writing courses in postgraduate programs should place heavy demands on more specific needs-based curriculum to meet their students' target needs.
How do opinion, discussion, and argumentative convince readers? How does each of them look different from each other seen from the generic structure, and language use? This conceptual paper is exploring how three selected genres in academic writing differ from each other. By reviewing journals of related topic of recently published, the writer convinces that opinion genre is less strong in persuading readers, and argumentative is very strong in assuring readers, whereas discussion is neutral in affecting readers The implication is that each genre has its own place to make readers satisfied and each of which indicates the level of ego and sophisticated countering back the statement called rebuttal and arguments and example. By reading this article readers will detect the tone of each genre and to what extent does each genre reach the readers' mind. The implication is that any teacher or lecturer is best recommended to present this model, particularly in EFL context.
Students’ Needs for Academic Writing at the English Education Department
English Language Teaching Educational Journal
There are some demand and facts on English teching and learning that made the research conducted. They are the teaching and learning in the academic writing class, the feedback from lecturers on the students language performance, the students’ weaknesses in writing, the students’ expectation for the materials, and the requirement on publishing scientific articles. The study, then, reveals the students’ needs for academic writing at the English Education Department of Ahmad Dahlan University and their problems in academic writing. The aspects investigated were teaching materials, learning activities, skills and learning resources. The data were obtained by a questionnaire to describe whether the stated items very interesting/very important – not very interesting/not very important. The number of population is 370. Krejcie and Morgan table was referred for the sample. An open question was responded to enable respondents to share more feedback on their academic writing skills and probl...
Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 2015
Even though writing as a language skill takes a back seat especially with reference to the natural order hypothesis, appreciation of writing in academic settings propel learners to challenge the validity of this order. It is not surprising therefore that writing deserves a higher priority in academic settings due much to its immediate practical application in a variety of academic tasks such as examination questions, essays, research reports, dissertation thesis and so on. In line with this constant practice with writing, English majoring students are quite usually subject to production of texts in the academic essay genre and desire to position themselves in academic discourse community through following the desired academic conventions. However, a considerable number of students fail to achieve the desired proficiency; cultural variations intrude into the language classrooms and differences in meaning learners attach to the writing activities are evident, which makes it necessary to explore students' perceptions from academic writing courses. To this end, questionnaires on students' writing efficacy were distributed to the freshman students enrolled in Academic Writing class, and interviews were carried out to have a broader understanding of the expectations from the course. Data from the questionnaire were analyzed using the SPSS and content analysis was employed to analyze the interviews.
Introducing University First Year Students to Academic Writing: Salient Issues
Journal La Edusci, 2024
The present study investigated problems faced by first year students at the National University of Lesotho (NUL) as they try to adjust their writing into academic style. The research subjects were from the faculties of Humanities and Science and Technology. Data were collected from the students' Communication and Study Skills (CSS) past examination papers (2018/2019). The study employed a descriptive design. A suitable analytical framework was crafted drawing from Appraisal and Metadiscourse theories. Also, some portions of the essays were analysed qualitatively to get a better understanding of the practices and also to identify common problems among students. The problems identified included citation incompetence, a limited repertoire of reporting verbs, poor academic writing style and some influence of creative writing. The study concluded that NUL first year students need more assistance to improve their academic writing skills and therefore recommended a number of solutions with more direct tutor intervention.
Students' and Teachers' Perceptions: An Inquiry Into Academic Writing
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 2012
Af ter one last look, Caleb (all names are pseudonyms) uploaded his paper comparing the economic systems of two neighboring countries, one a democracy, the other a kingdom. He was certain he had captured the essence of academic writing for this assignment in his social studies course. When asked what made his paper a good example of writing for an academic audience, Caleb explained that he had avoided the use of first person, checked spelling for errors, and followed the format prescribed by his teacher. His operational definition of academic writing had emphasized his attention to surface structures. He thought he knew exactly what his teacher wanted, but she was looking, instead, for evidence of deep connections with content through academic discourse. This misinterpretation is not uncommon. Awareness of the discrepancies between teacher expectations and student perceptions of academic writing can help teachers formulate an approach to student writing. Academic writing is a window into what students can do in the larger domain of academic discourse within disciplinary communities. In many ways, Caleb explored content in the important ways his teacher intended; however, his view of what was expected differed markedly from his teacher's. He is, after all, a novice in a secondary school (Heller, 2010) who has a ways to go in developing disciplinary expertise. Teachers often have well-defined perceptions of what content knowledge is and how that knowledge should be conveyed. Sometimes these perceptions are tacit and hard to define without sustained discussion, because they represent one's beliefs about linguistics, pedagogy, culture, and command of specific disciplinary knowledge and language. How students navigate academic discourse is evident in their written and oral classroom work. Realizing this, we wondered if students and teachers viewed academic discourse in the same ways. This inquiry focuses on students' and teachers' perceptions of written discourse in science, social studies, and English language arts in 10th grade. "Why do we have to do this?" Students often ask this question about written work. Let's be sure we teach them worthwhile skills.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2018
In EAP contexts, attaining a desired level of competence and fluency in academic writing is important for students majoring in English-medium undergraduate programs because their academic achievements are determined by the texts they produce in English. Undergraduate students in Turkey are observed to experience difficulties with academic writing as they try to accommodate their existing writing knowledge to the requirements of the new discipline-specific writing and learning situation of tertiary level education. Placing the students at the core of inquiry, the study explored factors influencing students' academic writing practices in English. The participants of the study were nineteen English major undergraduate students studying in Istanbul. The main data were obtained from background questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and were qualitatively analysed. The findings revealed that undergraduate writing is influenced by an array of interrelating educational and contextual factors: (1) the amount and nature of L1 and L2 pre-university writing instruction and experience, (2) students' perceptions about academic writing and disciplinary-specific text genres, (3) prolonged engagement with the academic context and discourse, and (4) expectations of faculty members. The insights gained from the study provide important implications for reconceptualization of writing instruction in Turkey.