The accuracy and reliability of digital measurements of gingival recession versus conventional methods (original) (raw)

A New Method for Volumetric Evaluation of Gingival Recessions: A Feasibility Study

Peer Kämmerer

Journal of Periodontology, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Inter- and intra-examiner agreement of three classification systems of gingival recession

Omid Moghaddas

Journal of Advanced Periodontology & Implant Dentistry

View PDFchevron_right

Accurate gingival recession quantification using 3D digital dental models

Nikolaos Gkantidis

Clinical Oral Investigations

View PDFchevron_right

A new digital evaluation protocol applied in a retrospective analysis of periodontal plastic surgery of gingival recessions

André Correia

Scientific Reports, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Assessment of non-carious root surface defects in areas of gingival recession: A descriptive study

Vanaja Naik

Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Evaluation of gingival biotype and recession following non-surgical periodontal treatment using 3-dimensional scan method

Jacopo Buti

Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 2023

View PDFchevron_right

Reliability study of Mahajan's classification of gingival recession: A pioneer clinical study

Amit Kumar

Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative Evaluation of the Accuracy of Gingival Thickness Measurement by Clinical Evaluation and Intraoral Ultrasonography

Niccoló Giuseppe Armogida

Journal of Clinical Medicine

View PDFchevron_right

Classification of Dental Surface Defects in Areas of Gingival Recession

Johnny Molina y Katherin Sandoval

View PDFchevron_right

Quantification of gingival contour and volume from digital impressions as a novel method for assessing gingival health

Evelyn Newby

International dental journal, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Correlation between gingival thickness and gingival recession in humans

Cassiano Rösing

Acta odontológica latinoamericana : AOL, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Cairo et al 2011 Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Santiago Galindo

View PDFchevron_right

The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability study

Umberto Pagliaro

Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement

Joseph Kan

The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Measurement of gingival thickness using digital vernier caliper and ultrasonographic method: a comparative study

Srinath Thakur

Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

A Novel Technique for the Estimation of Gingival Thickness: A Preliminary Study

serhat aslan

The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative Evaluation of Vertical and Lateral Gingival Displacement Produced by Mechanical and Chemical Retraction Systems through Digital Impressions using Intraoral Scanner - An in-Vivo Study

Kashish Manghani

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2023

View PDFchevron_right

Introduction of a Novel Anatomic Recession Ratio in the Treatment of Gingival Recession: A Proof-of-Principle Study

serhat aslan

The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry

View PDFchevron_right

Ultrasonographic biometry of soft tissues in patients with gingival recessions. Preliminary report

Jakub Kuryło

Journal of Stomatology

View PDFchevron_right

Influence of inter-dental tissues and root surface condition on complete root coverage following treatment of gingival recessions: a 1-year retrospective study

Jacopo Buti

Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Ultrasonography and lateral cephalometrics in the measurement of gingival thickness –A non-invasive way to go

dr neelam gavali

2021

View PDFchevron_right

Gingival biotype - comparative analysis of different evaluation methods

Filip Djordjevic

Vojnosanitetski pregled

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Ultrasonic Method and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Combined with Intraoral Scanning and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Method in Determining the Gingival Phenotype in the Healthy Periodontium

Małgorzata Rąpała

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

View PDFchevron_right

Application of Computer Software for Objective Evaluation of Changes in Size and Colour of Gingiva after Scaling and Root Planing ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Rutuja Sankhe

2017

View PDFchevron_right

Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject variation and influence of tooth type and clinical features

Hans-Peter Muller

Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 1996

View PDFchevron_right

A comparative evaluation of the reliability of three methods of assessing gingival biotype in dentate subjects in different age groups: An in vivo study

YU-CHENG CHU

View PDFchevron_right

Influence of ternion of soft tissue attributes on gingival recession and root coverage outcome – A retrospective analysis

Namratha Devaraj

IP International Journal of Periodontology and Implantology

View PDFchevron_right

Analysis of the gingival biotype based on the measurement of the dentopapillary complex

Franco Diez

View PDFchevron_right

The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva

Tim Rouck

Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

An evaluation of gingival phenotype and thickness as determined by indirect and direct methods

Mithran Goonewardene

The Angle Orthodontist

View PDFchevron_right

The role of orthodontics in the repair of gingival recessions

Birte Melsen

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2020

View PDFchevron_right