The Performance of Research-intensive Higher Educational Institutions in India (original) (raw)
Related papers
ArXiv, 2020
India is emerging as a major knowledge producer of the world in terms of proportionate share of global research output and the overall research productivity rank. Many recent reports, both of commissioned studies from Government of India as well as independent international agencies, show India at different ranks of global research productivity (variations as large as from 3rd to 9th place). The paper examines this contradiction; tries to analyse as to why different reports places India at different ranks and what may be the reasons thereof. The research output data for India, along with the ten most productive countries in the world, is analysed from three major scholarly databases: Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions for this purpose. Results show that both, the endogenous factors (such as database coverage variation and different subject classification schemes) and the exogenous factors (such as subject selection and publication counting methodology) cause the variations in dif...
arXiv: Digital Libraries, 2020
India is emerging as a major knowledge producer of the world in terms of proportionate share of global research output and the overall research productivity rank. Many recent reports, both of commissioned studies from Government of India as well as independent international agencies, show India at different ranks of global research productivity (variations as large as from 3rd to 9th place). The paper examines this contradiction; tries to analyse as to why different reports places India at different ranks and what may be the reasons thereof. The research output data for India, along with the ten most productive countries in the world, is analysed from three major scholarly databases: Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions for this purpose. Results show that both, the endogenous factors (such as database coverage variation and different subject classification schemes) and the exogenous factors (such as subject selection and publication counting methodology) cause the variations in dif...
Research Productivity and its Impact Analysis of the Central Universities of North East India
The current study evaluates about three primary fronts of research viz. productivity, impact and funding source of the nine central universities situated in North East India in a period from 2006 to 2015. During this period the total cumulative publications from the nine universities was 4011. During the period the research productivity while counted via publication output have seen a Combined Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 23% while the same for research impact is 52% in the citation time window from 2007 to 2016. Universities received funding from 56 Indian and 48 foreign agencies from 17 different countries. DST is the top funding Indian agency, while Korea is the top funding foreign country. " Chemistry " is found to be the most productive research area with most no of publications (25% of total publications) followed by Physics.
Comparative research evaluation of Top 10 institutions in India
There are 10 institutions in India which have published more than 500 papers during 2012-16 in each of at least ten subject areas, up from the 8 institutions that were in India when the last curation was done for the 2011-15 window in the Excellence Mapping initiative. The Council of Scientific Research (CSIR) stands out at the top, followed by four IITs and the IISc, and these are followed by four universities. We use the total count of papers P and scalar sum of exergies X to compute an average Best Paper Rate (BPR) for each institution. Using P as a proxy for quantity and BPR as a proxy for quality of academic research, we can track the performance trajectories of the various institutions in the quality-quantity space.
It is now generally accepted that institutions of higher education and research, largely publicly funded, need to be subjected to some benchmarking process or performance evaluation. Currently there are several international ranking exercises that rank institutions at the global level, using a variety of performance criteria such as research publication data, citations, awards and reputation surveys etc. In these ranking exercises, the data are combined in specified ways to create an index which is then used to rank the institutions. These lists are generally limited to the top 500–1000 institutions in the world. Further, some criteria (e.g., the Nobel Prize), used in some of the ranking exercises, are not relevant for the large number of institutions that are in the medium range. In this paper we propose a multidimensional ‘Quality–Quantity’ Composite Index for a group of institutions using bibliometric data, that can be used for ranking and for decision making or policy purposes at the national or regional level. The index is applied here to rank Central Universities in India. The ranks obtained compare well with those obtained with the h-index and partially with the size-dependent Leiden ranking and University Ranking by Academic Performance. A generalized model for the index using other variables and variable weights is proposed.
Rankings of Indian Universities: A Scientometrics Analysis
In the present paper an attempt has been made to assess the Academic rankings of Universities in India. The main objectives of the study are to measure the growth of publications of the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) accredited universities; to identify the rank of Indian universities; to measure the collaboration and h-index; to compare the Indian universities through publication output and h-index, and to find out the highly productive Indian universities and to rank them. For the study 50 Indian Universities output of publications have been taken from the SCOPUS international multidisciplinary bibliographical database covering during 2001-2010. Study provides the reader with a comprehensive understanding of a university ranking schemes based on its methodological issues, and impacts on society. The University rankings may be used in policy making and academic discussions.
Research Productivity and Citation Impact of Indian institutes of Science Education and Research
DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology
The paper’s main objective is to investigate the trends of basic science research in India using a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches. It examines the publication patterns and impact of research productivity of five basic science institutions, i.e., “Indian Institutes of Science Education and Research” (IISER), namely IISER Kolkata, IISER Pune, IISER Mohali, IISER Bhopal, and IISER Thiruvananthapuram. The research output indexed in the SCOPUS bibliographic database of these five established IISERs was obtained from 2015 to 2019. A total number of 7329 research publications were analysed using various scientometric dimensions. This paper makes a concerted effort to present a comprehensive picture of the assessment of research outcomes at the five older IISERs, which are ostensibly India’s most active and prominent basic science research institutions. The findings reveal that these institutions are accountable for important research outcomes, such as a high number ...
2020
During the last two decades, India has emerged as a major knowledge producer in the world, however different reports put it at different ranks, varying from 3rd to 9th places. The recent commissioned study reports of Department of Science and Technology (DST) done by Elsevier and Clarivate Analytics, rank India at 5thand 9th places, respectively. On the other hand, an independent report by National Science Foundation (NSF) of United States (US), ranks India at 3rd place on research output in Science and Engineering area. Interestingly, both, the Elsevier and the NSF reports use Scopus data, and yet surprisingly their outcomes are different. This article, therefore, attempts to investigate as to how the use of same database can still produce different outcomes, due to differences in methodological approaches. The publication counting method used and the subject selection approach are the two main exogenous factors identified to cause these variations. The implications of the analytic...
Current Science (Bangalore), 2010
We have carried out a three-part study comparing the research performance of Indian institutions with that of other international institutions. In the first part, the publication profiles of various Indian institutions were examined and ranked based on the h-index and p-index. We found that the institutions of national importance contributed the highest in terms of publications and citations per institution. In the second part of the study, we looked at the publication profiles of various Indian institutions in the high-impact journals and compared ...
2022
The evaluation of research output in the universities and other R & D institutions is essential for the overall development of the institutions. This study aims to analyse the research output of the nine selected central universities in northeast India. The required bibliographic information was obtained from an online Web of Science database, using an affiliation field tag with publication date range [query (OG=university Name) AND date range 01-01-2012 to 31-12-2021)].The dataset was carefully examined in the MS-Excel and analysed using R-package bibliometrix. A total of 8848 research contributions and 97107 citations have been observed. It is found that Tezpur University is the highest research publications (2875), followed by NEHU (1609)andAssam University (1436),respectively. A total of 1942 articles from all the selected universities were published in open access. The 'Current Science' and "RSC Advance' were the most common sources, and 'Chemistry' is the most prominent research area among selected central universities.