Rhetorical Schemes in Barack Obama’s Winning Speech (original) (raw)
Related papers
2014
Drawing on overarching methodological frameworks of Hallidayan grammatical metaphor, Fairclough's perspective on critical discourse analysis and rhetoric, this study attempts to posit a novel, integrated and practical approach to political, the media, advertisement and other discourses. To this end and based on the proposed approach, it aims to critically and eclectically exemplify and dissect three speeches delivered by Mr. Barack Obama, former president of the US, to first manifest the integrated approach practicality and adeptness through analysis; then by virtue of analysis to unveil how language is manipulated and distorted by orators in order to convey seamlessly intended messages and political creeds to the audience. Surveying recent annals of literature, to date no one has conducted an integrated study applying these disciplines in an individual paper and this study as a trial one can be useful for upcoming research. The analysis depicts practicality and efficiency of the integrated approach and displays that the speeches abound with nominalizations, modal verbs, parallelisms and antitheses. Furthermore, there are some three-part listing, the use of passivization, quotations and modality metaphors. Therefore, a tendency to utilize more nominalizations, parallelism and other devices by the speaker can be a fundamental reason for making his political language more powerful, impressive, persuasive and ambiguous as well.
Lingo-Rhetorical and Socio-Pragmatic Peculiarities in Political Speeches by Barack Obama
In modern speech communication theory, rhetorics is defined as a verbal content of peoples' social life and as a source of communicative interaction (Hudson,1978;Volkov, 2001; Daletskiy, 2003). That is why political rhetorics is considered to be an instrument of government in the political system of any society. Rhetorics includes a great number of cultural and linguistic phenomena as a part of the process of social communication. Rhetorics presupposes a convincing speech effect produced on the addressee by the sender. The description of linguistic, stylistic and socio-pragmatic specific features typical of a politician's speech behavior helps define his/her main communicative strategies. These strategies promote establishing harmonious communication and communicative contacts between the political leaders, on the one hand, and the electorate, on the other hand. They help the politician seize his/her political power and positions. The analysis performed in our investigation results in the description of the linguistic means and communicative strategies typical of the political leader, Barack Obama.
Rhetorical and metatextual features in political discourse: the case of Obama's speech on race
Elia Estudios De Linguistica Inglesa Aplicada, 2011
El objetivo de este artículo es llevar a cabo un análisis de las características gramaticales y metatextuales en el famoso discurso de Obama sobre la raza del año 2008. Este discurso fue pronunciado en un momento crítico de su campaña y su mensaje podía significar seguir con opciones de convertirse en el futuro Presidente o, por el contrario, perder cualquier credibilidad en el electorado. En este discurso él no solo tiene que decir su opinión sobre quien fuera su asesor espiritual durante varias décadas, el Reverendo Wright y sus polémicas palabras sino, además, su propia opinión del tema. Con este trabajo intento concluir con las razones por las que los discursos de Obama durante la campaña fueron tan aplaudidos por su contenido y los recursos gramaticales utilizados convirtiéndolos en mensajes bien construidos que hace que se consideren ejemplos de buenos discursos. Palabras clave: Características gramaticales metatextuales, discurso político The aim of this paper is to analyse the grammatical and metatextual features in Obama's famous speech on race given in 2008. It was delivered at a critical moment of his campaign and his message Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada Conchi Hernández-Guerra ELIA 11, 2011, pp. 119-146 could determine whether he would maintain the option of running for the Presidency of the country or, on the contrary, reduce his credibility with the voters. In this speech he has to discuss not only his opinion of his spiritual leader, the Reverend Wright, over several decades and the latter's polemical words but also give his own opinion about the subject. With this paper I try to consider why Obama's speeches in the campaign are so celebrated for their content and for the grammatical resources used to compose a well-combined message which is recognized as an example of excellent oratory.
Rhetoric and Discourse in Political Speeches
Alphabet, 2018
This research investigates the rhetoric and discourse of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono 's (henceforth SBY) and Joko Widodo's (henceforth JOKOWI) speeches related to policies and subsidy plans in increasing the price of fuel to enhance Indonesian economic recovery and development. Societies reacted differently on the speeches. One factor affecting societies' reaction is the rhetorical devices and the involvement of discourse device toward the speeches. By this fact, the goal of this research is to find out the comparison of persuasive strategies and the involvement of discourse devices toward their rhetorical speeches. In achieving this, the researcher employs descriptive qualitative research because it describes and interprets the process of research. Aristotle's theory on persuasive strategy is employed in the analysis. Moreover, Hasan and Halliday's theory of discourse is implemented in this research. The researcher finds all rhetoric strategies applied by SBY and JOKOWI. SBY mostly implements logos in his speech; meanwhile, Jokowi uses Pathos. Furthermore, SBY uses conjunction, reference and lexical cohesion; meanwhile, Jokowi uses ellipsis conjunction, reference and lexical cohesion.
2008
Language is produced intentionally by human beings for particular goals in communication. It functions as a means to seek for self-interest and it is related to power relations among people. They, therefore, use strategies and tactics to influence other people in order their goals can be realized. It is very interesting to investigate and analyze the ways Barack Obama as the presidential nomination from Democratic Party in the United States uses discursive tactics to influence the audiences. How does Barack Obama use Micro structural level strategies of discourse in his political speeches? What are the tactics on word structure used by Barack Obama? What are the tactics on phrasal structure used by Barack Obama? What are the tactics on expression or oral structure used by Barack Obama? What are the tactics on sentential structure used by Barack Obama? To answer the problems, the researcher adopts Critical Discourse Analysis introduced by Teun A. van Dijk about discourse structures a...
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Barack Obama " s Speeches
The Critical Discourse Analysis is often applied to analyze political discourse including the public speech, in which the speaker wins favorite response from the audience. This paper, based on Critical Discourse Analysis theory and Systematic Functional Linguistics, analyzes Barack Obama's presidential speeches mainly from the point of transitivity and modality, in which we can learn the language how to serve the ideology and power. Moreover, we can have a better understanding of the political purpose of these speeches.
In 2004, the American nation was introduced to the formidable rhetorical skills of the then Senator Obama with his delivery of the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention. The skills on display then have only grown and developed throughout the years leading to his successful presidential campaign of 2008. This paper addresses the various rhetorical devices that Obama uses so expertly: The use of personal narrative, repetition, metaphors, clichés, questions, opposites and so on. It is the various combinations of these devices that make reading or hearing an Obama speech such a rhetorical pleasure.
The Communication Presentation of Barack Obama Public Speaking Style
Jurnal Ilmiah LISKI (Lingkar Studi Komunikasi)
The main idea of this research is to analyse the English modals in Obama's speech semantically. The modal auxiliaries selected for analysis include (Will, Would, Can, Could, and Should). All the modal auxiliaries are interpreted based on the framework of Coates’ (1983) semantic clusters. The qualitative method of analysis is applied into this study. The modal auxiliary of ‘can’ signifying possibility functions to evoke positive emotions and connotations in the mind of all the listeners. It highlights the possibilities that are associated with people's hopes and wishes and reminds all citizens to look on the bright side, and the persuasion form is realized through the motivation on the Obama’s speech modal auxiliaries’ words. Keywords: Obama’s, Modality, Function, Speech, Public Speaking
Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 2013
A political discourse contains some features that must be constant in them to be recognized and understood by the audience as such but, at the same time, must fulfill the purpose of transmitting the message aimed in that venue with a personal and original style. This is commonly done through layers of direct or subtle content. One of the most important political orators in the twentieth century is undoubtedly President Barack Obama. Even his detractors recognize the high level of his speeches. The aim of this paper is to do a comprehensive analysis of the speech uttered by the President of the United States at Strasbourg, France in a very delicate political moment to reveal the rhetorical and intertextual means used to fulfill the purpose. The reason for his visit to Europe in 2009 was to explain the needs for the collaboration in the Afghan war in a moment in which Europe was against this participation.