Measuring ‘ Intelligence ’ : what can we learn and how can we move forward ? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Since its first mention during medieval ages, 'Intelligence' has been a contentious construct. The earlier conceptions of 'intelligence' were linked to the domain of philosophy. These conceptions came to be strongly condemned by early modern philosophers like Locke and Hume, and they preferred the term 'understanding' in their philosophical writings (Nidditch, 1975). The debate endures even today, albeit the contending parties now have the proponents of the psychometric approach on one side, and those supporting cognitive-contextual approaches on the other. Given the debates surrounding intelligence, public opinions can differ regarding the same. My current analysis proceeds via interviews held with three participants regarding their views on intelligence.
Exploring historically how intelligence has been defined, and why people have attempted to define it
A lot of multidisciplinary individuals have contributed to the history of intelligence and helped in building its foundations, from Charles Darwin to Francis Galton to Alfred Binet. This paper explores how intelligence has been defined and measured, as well as the reason behind defining intelligence from the perspective of these multidisciplinary individuals. The aim is to explore the diversity of the opinions and thought that went into shaping the way we think about intelligence and its measurements today.
Intelligence is a complex and controversial concept. Although controversies over its nature have abound since Plato’s fourth century B.C.E. conceptualization of the mind as a ‘separate entity’, those surrounding its assessment have persisted since Francis Galton’s efforts to establish a eugenics-based society in Great Britain by measuring individual differences in ability over 150 years ago (Goodwin, 2008; Plucker, 2007). While some researchers have suggested that intelligence is a single, general ability, others postulate that intelligence encompasses a range of aptitudes, skills, and talents (Cherry, 2011). This paper examines the origins of some of the major theories of intelligence and intelligence testing that have emerged during the past century and explains how intelligence is assessed in current times. In addition, it explores David Perkins’ current theory of intelligence and analyzes its strengths and weaknesses.
Practical Intelligence": Towards a New Conception of Intelligence
Language
Abstract'What is intelligence?'This question, as a very complex one, is really important in education, which is also related to the nature of human being. With the conception of intelligence, intelligence quotient (IQ) test under the name of'science'have had a strong ...
The issue discussed in this paper is the loss of meaning for the expressionintelligence'. The term taken from everyday language has been applied to various psychological definitions, theories or psychometric tests across a period of time which has contributed to the corrosion in meaning of the original term. Attempts by science to isolate and identify the qualities or attrib- utes of intelligence have altered if not entirely destroyed the meaning of the expression. A brief review of the history of the modern investigation into intelligence is thereby presented.