Differences in the Use of Pain Coping Strategies Between Oncology Inpatients with Mild vs. Moderate to Severe Pain (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Cancer Pain Inventory: preliminary development and validation
Psycho-Oncology, 2009
Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a Cancer Pain Inventory (CPI) that measures cancer patients' beliefs and concerns about pain. This paper describes development and pilot testing of a preliminary version of the CPI and describes its psychometric properties including its reliability and validity relative to established pain measures.
Pain and its interference with daily activities in medical oncology outpatients
Pain physician
Pain prevalence at various stages of cancer ranges from 27% to 60% for outpatients. Yet, how pain is managed in this patient group is poorly understood. The primary objective was to assess pain prevalence and intensity, and its interference with daily activities, in medical oncology outpatients. The secondary objectives were the adequacy of analgesic pain treatment and to identify independent predictors for moderate to severe pain. A cross-sectional study. Oncology outpatient clinics of 7 Dutch regional hospitals. Four hundred twenty-eight medical oncology outpatients were assigned to the study. Pain prevalence and interference of pain with daily activities were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. Adequacy of analgesic treatment was determined by calculating the Pain Management Index (PMI). Descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, and logistic regression analysis were conducted. More than one third of all participants reported pain (39%). Eighty-three patients (20%) had mo...
Pain experience and pain management among hospitalized cancer patients. A clinical study
Cancer, 1989
This study examines the nature, pattern, and consequences of pain experienced by cancer patients, both during hospitalization and during the immediate posthospitalization period. Of the 240 hospitalized cancer patients screened, 45% were found to be in pain. Although 59% of these patients had found ways to reduce their pain, nearly one third reported being seriously limited in their daily activities. Sleep disorder and mood disturbance also were related to the experience of pain. Applied pain management strategies were rated by two physicians as inadequate in 54% of cases. The most frequent recommendation for improved pain management was an increase in the dosage or a change in the class of analgesics. The importance of periodic assessment of pain and its consequences, both physical and psychological, is discussed in light of increasing the level of information available to physicians and patients regarding appropriate approaches to pain management.
Pain research & management : the journal of the Canadian Pain Society = journal de la société canadienne pour le traitement de la douleur
Uncontrolled cancer pain (CP) may impair quality of life. Given the multidimensional nature of CP, its poor control is often attributed to poor assessment and classification. To determine the characteristics and associations of pain intensity in a specialist CP clinic. Consecutive patients referred to the CP clinic of the Portuguese Cancer Institute (Lisbon, Portugal) had standardized initial assessments and status documentation of the following: Brief Pain Inventory ratings for 'pain now' as the outcome variable; initial pain intensity (iPI) on a 0 to 10 scale; pain mechanism (using the Douleur Neuropathique 4 tool to assess neuropathic pain); episodic pain; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group rating; oral morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD); Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale and Emotional Thermometer scores; and cancer diagnosis, metastases, treatment and pain duration. Univariable analyses were conducted to test the association of independent variables with iPI. Variable...
Cancer Pain and Quality of Life
Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing, 2019
Cancer pain is an unrelenting symptom with the potential to alter the quality of life of patients. To adequately manage pain, nurses caring for cancer patients need to fully understand each patient"s pain experience. The purpose of this study was to identify the intensity, distress, frequency, or constancy of pain in patients treated for cancer or cancer symptoms and to better understand patient barriers to pain management. This cross-sectional study included patients (N = 105) treated for cancer or cancer symptoms at 2 outpatient medical centers. Assessments included the Pain Barriers Scale, the Cancer Symptom Scale, and the Multidimensional QOL ScaleYCancer. Descriptive statistics and Spearman correlations were used to analyze the data. Sixty-nine percent of patients reported present pain of moderate to severe intensity that caused distress, was frequent/constant, or interfered with their lives. Patients with the greatest pain distress reported the greatest intensity of pain (r = 0.77) and the greatest interference (r = 0.78) with daily lives. Cancer pain was associated with significant distress and interference with life activities and occurred frequently or constantly for many study patients.
Factors that affect functional status in patients with cancer-related pain
Cancer-related pain in outpatient adult populations remains high and has a direct effect on functional status. Factors that affect functional status have been explored separately, but the inter-relatedness of those factors has not been examined. Using a cross-sectional design, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between pain level, beliefs about pain, symptom distress, perceived control over pain, and functional status in 304 ambulatory cancer patients who experienced cancer-related pain within the past 2 weeks. Participants completed standardized questionnaires during regularly scheduled clinic visits. Patient's pain level was positively related to increased distress and decreased perceived control over pain and functional status. Structural equation modeling indicated that symptom distress mediated the relation between pain level and functional status. Perceived control over pain had a direct effect on symptom distress and mediated the effect of beliefs about pain and pain level on symptom distress. Patients' perceived control over pain may be an important component in pain management. The direct and mediating effects of perceived control and symptom distress suggest areas of further research. Interventions to increase knowledge and decrease barriers to pain control have the potential for increasing perceived control over pain. Ó
Pain, 1998
The present study compared the adaptation of cancer pain patients and chronic non-cancer pain patients. Differences between samples of cancer pain patients with and without metastatic disease were also examined. Cancer pain patients reported comparable levels of pain severity to non-cancer chronic pain patients; however, pain due to cancer was associated with higher levels of perceived disability (t(250) = 2.97, P Ͻ 0.004) and lower degree of activity (t(286) = 2.45, P Ͻ 0.04). The patients with cancer pain, particularly those with metastatic disease, reported significantly higher levels of support and solicitous behaviors from significant others, compared to non-cancer chronic pain patients. The majority of the cancer patients, both with (81%) and without (84%) metastatic disease as well as non-cancer chronic pain patients (85%), could be classified into one of three psychosocial subgroups that had been previously identified with non-cancer chronic pain patients: 'dysfunctional' (high levels of pain, perceived interference, affective distress and low levels of perceived control and activity), 'interpersonally distressed' (high levels of affective distress, negative responses from significant others and low levels of perceived support) and 'adaptive copers' (low levels of interference and affective distress, high levels of perceived control and activity). The distribution of the profiles was significantly different across groups (x 2 (4) = 12.79, P Ͻ 0.02). However, within each profile, the response patterns were highly comparable across groups. Thus, contrary to the suggestions of some authors, cancer pain and non-cancer chronic pain patients share many features in common. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of psychosocial adaptation to pain within each patient group suggests the importance of psychological assessment in determining the pain management plan. © 1998 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
Does Pain Adversely Affect the Quality of Life in Hospitalized Cancer Patients?
Asian Journal of Medicine and Health, 2017
Background: Each year, 9 million patients are diagnosed as a cancer. The pain is the most common cancer-related symptom. The prevalence of severe pain at diagnosis, during-active treatment and at advanced disease stage range from to 14-100%, to 50-70% and to 60-90% respectively. Methods: In this study, the factors affecting the quality of life of cancer patients, the effects of these factors and pain on the quality of life of hospitalized cancer patients were investigated. 175 patients in Oncology Department were included. Short Form 36 and Algology Department form. Results: In our study, the proportion of patients who had pain and who had no pain were 98.9%