A Web based tool for securing digital evidence (original) (raw)
Related papers
Report from Dagstuhl Seminar 14092 Digital Evidence and Forensic Readiness Edited by
2015
The seminar on Digital Evidence and Forensic Readiness provided the space for interdisciplinary discussions on clearly defined critical aspects of engineering issues, evaluation and processes for secure digital evidence and forensic readiness. A large gap exists between the state-of-the-art in IT security and best-practice procedures for digital evidence. Experts from IT and law used this seminar to develop a common view on what exactly can be considered secure and admissible digital evidence. In addition to sessions with all participants, a separation of participants for discussing was arranged. The outcome of these working sessions was used in the general discussion to work on a common understanding of the topic. The results of the seminar will lead to new technological developments as well as to new legal views to this points and to a change of organizational measures using ICT. Finally, various open issues and research topics have been identified. In addition to this report, ope...
Combating Security Breaches and Criminal Activity in the Digital Sphere
Advanced Evidence is any data of probative quality that is either put away or transmitted in a double frame. In today's universe of propelling advances, more data is being produced, put away and appropriated by electronic means. This requires numerous offices to build the utilization of advanced proof social affair as a regular or standard instrument in their fight against violations. Computerized proof can be helpful in an extensive variety of criminal examinations. Numerous computerized gadgets productively track client action; it is likewise conceivable to recoup erased records, both of which may influence a criminal examination. Data is similar to the backbone for associations of all sizes, sorts and industry areas. It should be overseen and secured, and when there is a break or wrongdoing conferred including spilled or stolen data, the culprits must be recognized and indicted. Expanded Internet entrance has given exponential ascent in refined assaults on Information Technol...
The preservation of digital evidence and its admissibility in the court
International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 2017
This article's objective is to screen and analyse the common models of digital preservation that exist, the elements, the degree of compliance with the general guidelines, the use of techniques and compliance with specific requirements as well as to evaluate the need for a solution to the environment of criminal investigation institutions, in the scenario that lacks a specific model. The importance of the preservation of digital objects is currently heavily analysed. Several aspects may serve to make the digital objects worthless, such as the uselessness of hardware, the deficiency of ancient computing formats to support their use, human errors and malicious software. The majority of crimes currently have a digital component, such that governments and the police are obliged by law to indefinitely hold digital evidence for a case's history. Until the presentation of the digital evidence in court, the evidence must be collected, preserved and properly distributed. The systems currently used often involve multiple steps that do not meet the demands of the growing digital world. The volume of digital evidence continues to grow, and these steps will soon become operationally and economically unfeasible for agencies responsible for performing these tasks.
On the Creation of Reliable Digital Evidence
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 2012
Traditional approaches to digital forensics deal with the reconstruction of events within digital devices that were often not built for the creation of evidence. This paper focuses on incorporating requirements for forensic readiness-designing in features and characteristics that support the use of the data produced by digital devices as evidence. The legal requirements that such evidence must meet are explored in developing technical requirements for the design of digital devices. The resulting approach can be used to develop digital devices and establish processes for creating digital evidence. Incorporating the legal view early in device design and implementation can help ensure the probative value of the evidence produced the devices.
Stephen Mason and Daniel Seng eds. Electronic Evidence and Electronic Signatures 5th edn (London, UK: University of London, 2021), 236–278., 2021
The chapter discusses the meaning of authenticity through time. It introduces the concepts of identity and integrity, accuracy and reliability, and shows how authentication in the digital world will be increasingly based on circumstantial evidence—such as the system(s) in which a record has been stored through time—rather than on the electronic material submitted as evidence itself. In fact, we cannot preserve such material, but only our ability to re-produce or re-create it, and we need to distinguish between stored and manifested evidence and assess both. Ultimately, authentication might have to be an inference based on security.
The long way from electronic traces to electronic evidence
International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 2004
General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
DIGITAL FORENSIC:A PANACEA FOR EVIDENCE PRESERVATION
Digital Forensic is the preservation, identification, recovery, documentation, analysis, and interpretation of digital evidence. Digital evidences are electronically stored records, facts, signs, information of probative value that shows clearly that an event occurred or that a crime has been committed. Preservation of Digital Evidence is the crux of Digital Forensics. As such, it must be handled in a way to ensure that it is promptly identified, preserved, collected, examined, analyzed and documented appropriately so that it is evidently weighty, authentic, reliable, believable, complete and that it passes the test of legal admissibility. Evidence Preservation is being constantly plagued with issues needed to be technically, administratively and legally resolved. Of which is, the rate of standardization of Digital Forensics Processes, particularly evidence preservation, by International standardizing bodies is slower than the challenges and continuously evolving digital technology. Consequently, Proactive, Sustained and Non-fragmented Research and Practitioner Communities must be established, where they do not exist and also supported by national and regional standardization organizations, to see to faster and up-to-date solutions. Such communities have greatly helped to sustain continuous growth and standardization in other fields such as software engineering, web frameworks, and mobile technology. A consolidated framework, the Enhanced Generic Digital Forensic Investigation Model (EGDFIM), is proposed in this work.
Digital Evidence and Forensic Readiness
Using Forensic Readiness and E-Discovery in Quality Information Risk Management Planning
The seminar on Digital Evidence and Forensic Readiness provided the space for interdisciplinary discussions on clearly defined critical aspects of engineering issues, evaluation and processes for secure digital evidence and forensic readiness. A large gap exists between the state-of-the-art in IT security and best-practice procedures for digital evidence. Experts from IT and law used this seminar to develop a common view on what exactly can be considered secure and admissible digital evidence. In addition to sessions with all participants, a separation of participants for discussing was arranged. The outcome of these working sessions was used in the general discussion to work on a common understanding of the topic. The results of the seminar will lead to new technological developments as well as to new legal views to this points and to a change of organizational measures using ICT. Finally, various open issues and research topics have been identified. In addition to this report, open research issues will also be published in the form of a manifesto on digital evidence. One possible definition for Secure Digital Evidence was proposed by Rudolph et al. at the Eighth Annual IFIP WG 11.9 International Conference on Digital Forensics 2012. It states that a data record can be considered secure if it was created authentically by a device for which the following holds: The device is physically protected to ensure at least tamper-evidence. The data record is securely bound to the identity and status of the device (including running software and configuration) and to all other relevant parameters (such as time, temperature, location, users involved, etc.) The data record has not been changed after creation. Digital Evidence according to this definition comprises the measured value and additional information on the state of the measurement device. This additional information on the state of the measurement device aims to document the operation environment providing evidence that can help lay the foundation for admissibility. This definition provided one basis of discussion at the seminar and was compared to other approaches to forensic readiness. Additional relevant aspects occur in the forensic readiness of mobile device, cloud computing and services. Such scenarios are already very frequent but will come to full force in the near future. The interdisciplinary Dagstuhl seminar on digital evidence and forensic readiness has provided valuable input to the discussion on the future of various types of evidence and it has build the basis for acceptable and sound rules for the assessment of digital evidences. Furthermore, it has established new links between experts from four continents and thus has set the foundations for new interdisciplinary and international co-operations.
From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Forensics
Il y a quinze ans, Elizabeth Diamond décrivait l'archiviste comme un scientifique médicolégal. Depuis quelques années, plusieurs auteurs dans le domaine de l'archivistique ont qualifié les professionnels responsables de la préservation des documents numériques de conservateurs de confiance (« trusted keepers »), ou de gardiens (« custodians »). Sans doute, dans l'environnement numérique, on fait de plus en plus appel aux professionnels de l'information pour évaluer et préserver l'authenticité des documents dont ils sont responsables, et pour agir en tant que tierce parties neutres. Mais sont-ils qualifiés pour remplir ce rôle? Cet article tente d'identifier les connaissances que doit avoir le professionnel d'information de confiance pour être capable d'évaluer la véracité (« trustworthiness ») des documents numériques et pour assurer que leur authenticité puisse être démontrée, au besoin, à n'importe quel point dans leur cycle de vie. Pour ce faire, l'article présente des concepts développés par le projet InterPARES dans le domaine de la diplomatique des documents numériques; il compare ceux-ci aux concepts pertinents dérivés d'une discipline relativement nouvelle, le numérique médicolégal (« digital forensics »); il discute des méthodologies dont se servent les deux disciplines; et il propose des domaines qui pourraient être explorés conjointement par les experts en diplomatique et en numérique médicolégal afin de développer un corpus de savoir intégré que l'on pourrait nommer la science médicolégale des documents numériques (« Digital Records Forensics »).