Reconstruction of Narratives from literature to film: The significant points of Divergences: Director as an Author (original) (raw)
Related papers
A Comparative Study of Cinematic Texts vis-à-vis the Literary Texts
JRSP-ELT (ISSN: 2456-8104), 2021
Literature and cinema have always been vibrant mediums for expression. Their touching and moving appeal has made them popular across regions and time periods. However, despite their wide appeal, both literature and cinema are two different forms of art with varying audience and requirements. This paper aims to uphold a comparison between literature as a medium of communication and cinema as a medium of portrayal. The study takes into account few case studies to highlight the differences in the same text in relevance to the medium they are in. It also attempts to analyze the various techniques used in the two media to reach out to the audience or readers and tries to find out the effects and differences of the cinematic text and literary texts. The paper also briefly looks into the concepts of adaptation from one media to the other and highlights the benefits and drawbacks of both the media. Finally, the paper takes up a study of the influence of literature and cinema over one another, concluding with a comparison of their popularity across time and space.
2021
The present paper stems from an awareness of clear correspondences, relations, and parallels between literature and film. The theoretical findings and exemplifications presented in it allow one to precisely identify the so-called points of contact between film and literature, as well as the character of these interactions. Relationships between literature and film are of a parallel character, and their mutual relations are varied and multi-faceted. The cinematicity of literature can include both indirect (community, homology) and direct (proper film-like character) references to film. A structural analysis of individual works of literature should also account for socio-cultural perspectives, limited here to the period between 1918 and 1939. Film inspirations in literature can be considered from the perspective of plot, narration, and genology. literature
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH , 2013
Literature has strongly shaped the way we think and behave. Over the last hundred years film has become a progressively more powerful and dominant form and we have sufficient evidence to suggest that the visual has now significantly replaced the written form as the leading mode of communication in contemporary society. Since film is a fairly recent phenomenon, it has rented a great deal from other forms of expression particularly from literature. The present paper focuses on the relation between film and literature and discusses film as a cinematic novel with the help of film Gandhi, directed by Richard Attenborough. This film is a multi award winning biopic film about the life of Mahatma Gandhi who was a leader of nonviolent resistance movement against British colonial rule in India during the first half of the 20th century. The reason to take Gandhi as a case study is because his teachings and ideology have influenced people of all over the world and many have attempted to portray Mahatma Gandhi's life through different creative avenues such as prose, poetry, drama and theatre.
Film at the crossroads of narrative and dramatic genre
If film is a form of visual art, why does it rely mainly upon narrative text and is not more indebted to drama? Why are theatrical plays not so easily (and frequently) adapted for the screen as novels and short stories? Is it true, as Käte Hamburger suggests, that “filmed drama becomes epic”? In order to grasp the concept of film hybridism (both film theorists and film makers have long dealt with the natural tendency of film to absorb other art features and forms), in this paper I intend to address the issue of film genre by taking into account Jauss’s evolutional theory and confronting it with Frye’s concept of “radical of presentation”. André Bazin spoke of the impurity of film, whilst Manoel de Oliveira, who has been said to produce “theatrical films”, clearly states that “film adds to theatre the capacity of fixing the image in time”. Time is, in fact, a decisive factor in genre definition – as Hegel clearly demonstrated – and it is through the way that film deals with this factor that we are able to gauge either its distance from or its closeness to drama and/or to literature.
Intermedialität and Literature. What is Filmic Rewriting?
This research is based on my multiple readings and re-readings of the novels of George Orwell for almost two decades. Orwell’s 1984, at least, is not just a very influent writing on our perceptions regarding surveillance: “Big Brother” is everywhere as discursive instance in our days; this may be a political and sociological starting point of discussion. Besides, it is a good example for discussing various aspects of how literature is used by readers – implying a whole debate upon the functions of literature. My reading of the filmic rewriting of Orwell’s 1984 (discussed in another study) revealed profound mutations in analysing the film as medium. It provided grounds for comparison, but not just for the sake of comparison (“comparaison n’est pas raison”, as Rene Etiemble emphasized in ‘60s). It is a fruitful starting point, as I try to focus on the relationships not only between film and literature, but also on dialectics of various approaches on the relationship between these media. The main goals are to observe and to evaluate what “degree of theoreticity” is admitted in our critical reading of adaptation. Comparatists should also investigate – as Claudio Guillén stated in Entre lo uno y lo diverso: introducción a la literatura comparada (1985) – how far can we go with categories or classes when they are subject of a comparative reading. In analysing the relationships between film and literature, one must not forget Susan Sontag’s claim in affirming that film, the narrative film namely (use of plot, characters, setting, dialogue, imagery, manipulating time and space) shares with literature the most.
Cinematic Media: Literature, Culture & Art of Crafting Narrative Structures
The Dawn Journal
Cinema and Literature are two distinct but equally extraordinary works of art. Literature is looking for new ways of unfolding the plot, building text space, cinematography, new ways of interpreting the stories and developing a verbal layer of cinetext. Cinema becomes a way of transformation, of recognition, of perception of a person, by the method of familiarising the individual with a cultural layer. Through screening, Cinema not only indirectly acquaints a person with the texts of literary classics, but also participates in the development of literary text preventing its necrosis. Literature is becoming more and more pictorial and has been a way of artistic expression for centuries. Literature takes its readers on a journey of imagination that is away from the real world while cinema shows such an imaginative world before the audience and they do not have to put much pressure on their minds to delve into their imaginations. Literature is an art which is developed through writing while Cinema brings to life those writings to life through sound, music, visuals, and actors. Cinema is a filtered version of reality and it truly reflects society. Films are frantic and really look forward to connecting with their audiences, trying to fulfil what society truly desires. Cinema is the most popular of cultural practices reflecting a plethora of social, economic and cultural phenomena in modern society.