Conserved motifs on the cytoplasmic face of the protein translocation channel are critical for the transition between resting and active conformations (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Sec62-Sec63 translocon facilitates translocation of the C-terminus of membrane proteins
Journal of cell science, 2014
The Sec62-Sec63 complex mediates post-translational translocation of a subset of primarily secretory proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in yeast. Therefore, it has been thought that membrane proteins, which are mainly co-translationally targeted into the ER, are not handled by the Sec62-Sec63 translocon. By systematic analysis of single and multi-spanning membrane proteins with broad sequence context [with differing hydrophobicity, flanking charged residues and orientation of transmembrane (TM) segments], we show that mutations in the N-terminal cytosolic domain of yeast Sec62 impair its interaction with Sec63 and lead to defects in membrane insertion and translocation of the C-terminus of membrane proteins. These results suggest that there is an unappreciated function of the Sec62-Sec63 translocon in regulating topogenesis of membrane proteins in the eukaryotic cell.
The Journal of Cell Biology, 2004
he cytoplasmic surface of Sec61p is the binding site for the ribosome and has been proposed to interact with the signal recognition particle receptor during targeting of the ribosome nascent chain complex to the translocation channel. Point mutations in cytoplasmic loops six (L6) and eight (L8) of yeast Sec61p cause reductions in growth rates and defects in the translocation of nascent polypeptides that use the cotranslational translocation pathway. Sec61 heterotrimers isolated from the L8 sec61 mutants have a greatly reduced affinity for T 80S ribosomes. Cytoplasmic accumulation of protein precursors demonstrates that the initial contact between the large ribosomal subunit and the Sec61 complex is important for efficient insertion of a nascent polypeptide into the translocation pore. In contrast, point mutations in L6 of Sec61p inhibit cotranslational translocation without significantly reducing the ribosome-binding activity, indicating that the L6 and L8 sec61 mutants affect different steps in the cotranslational translocation pathway.
The structure of the Sec complex and the problem of protein translocation
EMBO reports, 2006
Proteins synthesized in the cytosol either remain there or are localized to a specific membrane and subsequently translocated to another cellular compartment. These extracytosolic proteins have to cross, or be inserted into, a phospholipid bilayer-a process governed by membrane-bound protein transporters designed to recognize and receive appropriate polypeptides and thread them through the membrane. One such translocation complex, SecY/Sec61, is found in every cell, in either the plasma membrane of bacteria and archaea or the endoplasmic reticulum membrane of eukaryotes. Recent structural findings, combined with previous genetic and biochemical studies, have helped to describe how the passage of proteins through the membrane might occur, but several points of uncertainty remain.
Translocation of proteins through the Sec61 and SecYEG channels
Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 2009
The Sec61 and SecYEG translocation channels mediate the selective transport of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum and bacterial inner membrane, respectively. These channels are also responsible for the integration of membrane proteins. To accomplish these two critical events in protein expression, the transport channels undergo conformational changes to permit the export of lumenal domains and the integration of transmembrane spans. Novel insight into how these channels open during protein translocation has been provided by a combination of the analysis of new channel structures, biochemical characterization of translocation intermediates, molecular dynamics simulations, and in vivo and in vitro analysis of structure-based Sec61 and SecY mutants.
Molecular and cellular biology, 1992
SEC63 encodes a protein required for secretory protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (J. A. Rothblatt, R. J. Deshaies, S. L. Sanders, G. Daum, and R. Schekman, J. Cell Biol. 109:2641-2652, 1989). Antibody directed against a recombinant form of the protein detects a 73-kDa polypeptide which, by immunofluorescence microscopy, is localized to the nuclear envelope-ER network. Cell fractionation and protease protection experiments confirm the prediction that Sec63p is an integral membrane protein. A series of SEC63-SUC2 fusion genes was created to assess the topology of Sec63p within the ER membrane. The largest hybrid proteins are unglycosylated, suggesting that the carboxyl terminus of Sec63p faces the cytosol. Invertase fusion to a loop in Sec63p that is flanked by two putative transmembrane domains produces an extensively glycosylated hybrid protein. This loop, which is homologous to the amino terminus of the Escherichia coli heat shock...
Structure of the post-translational protein translocation machinery of the ER membrane
Nature, 2018
Many proteins must translocate through the protein-conducting Sec61 channel in the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum membrane or the SecY channel in the prokaryotic plasma membrane 1,2. Proteins with hydrophobic signal sequences are first recognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP) 3,4 and then moved co-translationally through the Sec61/SecY channel by the associated translating ribosome. Substrates with less hydrophobic signal sequences bypass SRP and are moved through the channel post-translationally 5,6. In eukaryotic cells, post-translational translocation is mediated by the association of the Sec61 channel with another membrane protein complex, the Sec62/Sec63 complex 7-9 , and substrates are moved through the channel by the luminal BiP ATPase 9. How the Sec62/63 complex activates the Sec61 channel for posttranslational translocation is unclear. Here, we report the electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of the Sec complex from S. cerevisiae, consisting of the Sec61 channel and the Sec62, Sec63, Sec71, and Sec72 proteins. Sec63 causes wide opening of the lateral gate of the Sec61 channel, priming it for the passage of low-hydrophobicity signal sequences into the lipid phase, without displacing the channel's plug domain. Lateral channel opening is triggered by Sec63 interacting with both cytosolic loops in the C-terminal half of Sec61 and trans-membrane (TM) segments in the N-terminal half of the Sec61 channel. The cytosolic Brl domain of Sec63 blocks ribosome binding to the channel and recruits Sec71 and Sec72, positioning them for the capture of polypeptides associated with cytosolic Hsp70 (ref. 10). Our structure shows how the Sec61 channel is activated for post-translational protein translocation. The Sec61 channel is formed from the multi-spanning Sec61 protein and two singlespanning proteins (called Sbh1 and Sss1 in S. cerevisiae) 7,8. Sec61 and its prokaryotic homolog SecY consist of two halves that form an hourglass-shaped pore with a constriction Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:
Structure of the native Sec61 protein-conducting channel
Nature communications, 2015
In mammalian cells, secretory and membrane proteins are translocated across or inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane by the universally conserved protein-conducting channel Sec61, which has been structurally studied in isolated, detergent-solubilized states. Here we structurally and functionally characterize native, non-solubilized ribosome-Sec61 complexes on rough ER vesicles using cryo-electron tomography and ribosome profiling. Surprisingly, the 9-Å resolution subtomogram average reveals Sec61 in a laterally open conformation, even though the channel is not in the process of inserting membrane proteins into the lipid bilayer. In contrast to recent mechanistic models for polypeptide translocation and insertion, our results indicate that the laterally open conformation of Sec61 is the only conformation present in the ribosome-bound translocon complex, independent of its functional state. Consistent with earlier functional studies, our structure suggests that the rib...
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Edited by Norma Allewell The biosynthesis of many eukaryotic proteins requires accurate targeting to and translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Post-translational protein translocation in yeast requires both the Sec61 translocation channel, and a complex of four additional proteins: Sec63, Sec62, Sec71, and Sec72. The structure and function of these proteins are largely unknown. This pathway also requires the cytosolic Hsp70 protein Ssa1, but whether Ssa1 associates with the translocation machinery to target protein substrates to the membrane is unclear. Here, we use a combined structural and biochemical approach to explore the role of Sec71-Sec72 subcomplex in post-translational protein translocation. To this end, we report a crystal structure of the Sec71-Sec72 complex, which revealed that Sec72 contains a tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain that is anchored to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane by Sec71. We also determined the crystal structure of this TPR domain with a C-terminal peptide derived from Ssa1, which suggests how Sec72 interacts with full-length Ssa1. Surprisingly, Ssb1, a cytoplasmic Hsp70 that binds ribosome-associated nascent polypeptide chains, also binds to the TPR domain of Sec72, even though it lacks the TPR-binding C-terminal residues of Ssa1. We demonstrate that Ssb1 binds through its ATPase domain to the TPR domain, an interaction that leads to inhibition of nucleotide exchange. Taken together, our results suggest that translocation substrates can be recruited to the Sec71-Sec72 complex either post-translationally through Ssa1 or cotranslationally through Ssb1.