مقایسه تأثیر بهکارگیری روشهای ارزشیابی DOPS وMini-CEX با روش سنتی بر مهارتهای بالینی دانشجویان پرستاری:یک مطالعه تجربی تصادفی شده (original) (raw)
Related papers
Background and aim: It is necessary to state total information about the design, procedures, intervention groups in study, results for data in order to present a suitable report of controlled randomized clinical trial. This study was aimed to evaluate the quality of materials and methods for the writings of final proposal in clinical trial studies in Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. Methods: In this descriptive-analytic study, 53 approved final proposals of controlled randomized clinical trial studies in Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences were selected from 1998 to 2013. The selection and quality of material and method writing was evaluated based on final version of consort checklist. Results: The scores mean was obtained for the quality of materials and methods writings based on the checklist 6.75±1.92. The notation of interventions in each group (%96.2), identification of primary and secondary study (%88.7), and the state of statistical ways (% 86.8) showed the most scores and the randomizing the least score (%3.8). The projects which were the student theses rather than not being thesis (p=0.011). Conclusion: Performed clinical trials in Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences aren't in a suitable report way. So, it is advised to provide a standard consort instruction and was delivered to researchers, reviewers, and statistical counselors in order to design study and report clinical trial studies.
تکامل مهارتهای بازانديشی پرستاران پس از بهکارگيری پورت فوليو: يک مطالعه کيفی
مجله ايراني آموزش در علوم پزشکی, 2012
Introduction: Use of portfolio is growing as a functional tool in promotion and development of general and specific skills such as reflection and making link from theory to practice. This study aimed to explore nurses' perceptions and experiences of using portfolio. Methods: This qualitative study was conducted during years of 2009-2010 through qualitative content analysis method in a university hospital in Bushehr. At first, portfolio was introduced to nurses and they used portfolio in their clinical performance for a year. Finally 26 nurses were selected through purposeful sampling. Three focus group discussions were run for data collection. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interviews were continued until data saturation and then themes were extracted. Results: Subsequent to data analysis of participating nurses' perceptions and experiences, theme of "ladder of reflective development" was derived from interviews. This theme encompasses steps of reflection development in nurses and four steps of feeling strange, anxiety reduction and acceptance, internalization, and learning and application was introduced. Conclusion: Steps of reflective thinking skills development indicated an inadequate knowledge level among nurses about portfolios and reflection. However, portfolio left a positive impact on reflective thinking skills of nurses and use of portfolio. Therefore, use of this tool is recommended to be considered in clinical nursing.
Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, 2013
Evaluation, as one of the quality progress tools, makes it possible to identify strengths and weakness points by taking appropriate steps in the evolution and reform in the workflow by strengthening the positive aspects of the programs and eliminating the failures. This Study was based on the CIPP model in 2010 with the objective of evaluation of Medical School faculty at Rafsanjan university of medical sciences. Materials and Methods: This Study was a descriptive-cross sectional and study population consisted of 63 students, 28 faculty members and 10 graduates students. The researcher-made questionnaire was used for data gathering. The questionnaire included two parts: demographic information and questions. Zero score to 1.5 (unfavorable status), 1.51 to 3.50 (relatively favorable), and 3.51 to 5 was considered desirable status. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: From the perspective of the participants the status at the context, input, process, and whole medical school was considered to be relatively favorable. The results showed that in general, as in the areas of context, process and product of medical school, there was a significant differences between Instructors and students (p≤0.05). Students evaluated context better than instructors and instructors evaluated input, process and product and whole medical school better than the students. Conclusion: The final results of the evaluation of medical school showed that the status is desirable. In order to achieve quite desirable results it's optimal that officials of this university and colleges improve the important factors such as reviewing the material and educational content have regulars instruction for new teaching methods hold assessments and teach communication skills to their instructors.
بررسی ديدگاه دانشجويان در خصوص جو آموزشی (مدل DREEM) در دانشگاه علوم پزشکی گلستان در سال 1390
Background and objective: The educational environment may be varied in different teaching and learning areas whether it is close to or away from standards. Educational climate is a representative of curriculum, dominant spirit on schools, and educational programs. Learning environment is a determining factor and is an indication of students' perception of their embedded learning circumstance. This study aimed to investigate the views of the students about their learning environment based on DREEM model. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive analytical study was conducted in 2011 on 148 medical and paramedical students using cluster sampling method. Data was gathered by DREEM questionnaire consisting of learning, teachers, and students' perception of academic ability, educational climate, and social environment domains. The questionnaire total score was categorized in five groups; undesirable (0-50), semi desirable (51-100), somewhat desirable (101-150), good (151-200), and very good (201-250). Data was analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics with p<0.05. Results: 3.4 percent of the students perceived educational climate as very satisfactory, 67.6 percent as favorable, 28.4 percent somewhat favorable, and 0.7 percent as low. There was a significant relationship between gender and educational climate(p<0.05). The male students had more positive view toward educational environment of the university than the female peers. Conclusion: The majority of the students perceived the educational environment of the university as optimum. Male students had more positive view toward educational climate of the university than the female ones.
بررسی تأثیر گروه درمانی شناختی برکاهش افسردگی دانشآموزان
مجله دانش و تندرستي, 2011
Introduction: Depending on its etiology, many methods have been established for the treatment of depression among adolescents; cognitive therapy is one of them. The purpose of the present research was to investigate the effect of cognitive group therapy on decreasing depression among high school students. Methods: From the male students of a boarding high school in Tarom district of Gazvin province, a sample of 16 students were randomly selected and assigned into experimental and control groups. The measurement tool was Beck depression inventory. The experimental group participated in 8 sessions of cognitive therapy, while the control group did not receive any treatment. The mean scores of the two groups were compared through independent t-test. Results: The results of the study showed significant differences between the mean scores of the pre-tests and post-tests of the experimental and control groups, so that cognitive group therapy had reduced the depression mean score in the experimental group (-2.1 vs.-0.25). Conclusion: The findings of the study indicate that cognitive group therapy can reduce the depression among students. These findings can be used for therapeutic planning within the cognitive paradigm to reduce or prevent depression among students.