A Vanished Past? The Uses of a Historical Square in Thessaloniki (original) (raw)
Related papers
Crisis of the memory – two monuments from the socialist era today
2017
The essay studies the sorrowful present of two landmark monuments of the socialist era: the memorial “1300 Years Bulgaria” and the “Buzludzha Monument.” Built to commemorate important events of Bulgarian history, today these significant historical masterpieces of architecture and art from the second half of the 20th century are abandoned and doomed to destruction. The need to rethink their historical role and to start a discourse on the threat of destruction of the cultural heritage of our country is brought to the front. I argue that it is necessary to inform and educate the community on the problems of protection and preservation of the national cultural values. By applying a semiotic analysis the essay aims to reveal the complex layers of meaning coded in the two monuments in order to establish criteria for aesthetic evaluation of the artistic qualities which are not subject to political bias and reflect the intransient values in architecture and art. The presented projects exemp...
Mechanisms of memory: remembrance in contemporary art practices in the post-Yugoslav space
2019
Forest and Juliet Johnson 2 in 2002, and Cultural policies, identities and monument building in Southeastern Europe by Milena Dragićević Šešić 3 from 2001 situate monuments as a principal link between memory and national identity. Using their theories, it makes it possible to better understand the need for building, and later, the need for systematic destruction of the NOB 4 monuments throughout the territory of former Yugoslavia. In the last couple of years, there has been an increased global interest for the anti-fascist Yugoslav monuments. Many articles focusing on these structures were published in magazines such as The Guardian 5 and Smithsonian 6. Nevertheless, this interest revolves mostly around their modernist, brutalist and, one might say, futurist aesthetic. The monuments have been appropriated for fashion, music videos 7 and other, while being stripped of their history and symbolism through this appropriation. In addition, many of these articles are in reality connected to the Dutch photographer Jan Kempenaers and his series of photographs named Spomeniks, which will be approached later in the thesis. Although these articles do not participate in the contribution to the field, it is important to be aware of them. They point to, although superficial for now, a revival of the Yugoslav antifascist monuments, and with it, the reintroduction of the memories that were left to decay. The importance of the anti-fascist Yugoslav monuments and the erasure of memories they symbolized came to the attention of scholars only in the recent past, albeit rarely. What follows are articles that emerged as most significant while researching this particular topic. The first article, by Sandina Begić and Boriša Mraović in 2010, is titled Forsaken Monuments and Social Change: The Function of Socialist Monuments in the Post-Yugoslav Space 8 and was published as a chapter of the Symbols that Bind, Symbols that Divide book. In the article, the
Fascism and Nazism are/were “social constitutions without memory”. On account of the initial memory imbalance in their mental constitutions, where the initiative is on the side of the invasive mechanisms of oblivion (before memory and remembrance), every comprehension of reality – be it present or past – is thwarted. On the one hand testimonies about the concentrationary universe, its multiple forms of deprivation and politics of terror that have marked various grades of oblivion – the oblivion of humanity, of care for others and of ethics, and on the other hand the Shoah as the residual event of the 20th century that has spread out a monstrous model of the physical extermination of whole communities (mostly Jews, but also some others to a smaller degree) by means of industrial killing – outline the agency of radicalized oblivion by totalitarian societies on a large scale. The article – in connection with the concentration camps and the Shoah – in the first place enumerates three principal oblivions in the Slovene historiography of the Third Reich. These are: oblivion of the places of Nazi terror, oblivion of segments of the Slovene collaboration with the Nazis, and oblivion of some of the supreme figures from the Nazi genocide policy who were at least partially of Slovene descent. All three oblivions are linked to the local, national and transnational histories. The article also delineates complex conceptual relations between memory, oblivion, history and discourse. Keywords: history, memory, oblivion, discourse, Shoah, concentration camp, transmission, Odilo Globočnik, culture of silence
0123 A place of memory – monument – counter-monument
2020
In recent years, Krakow's district of Podgórze has witnessed the erection of several works in public space that are concerned with the memory of the place. A monumental piece erected by Witold Cęckiewicz in the 1960s in the former Płaszów Concentration Camp has been joined by contemporary works. It is especially the Ghetto Heroes Square and its direct vicinity that have been addressed by artists and designers who, through their works, i.e. Mateusz Okoński's Purification, Łukasz Skąpski's 10 cubic metres of Krakow's wintertime air, and a structure in the form of multiple chairs by Lewicki and Łatak's studio entered into a dialogue with the paradigm of counter-monumentality and postmemory. For common viewers and casual passers-by, as well as for residents of the district, these works are hardly evocative of recent history, or the events they are meant to commemorate. Do these works, with their consciously taken position on the verge of the visible, that is, on the ...
POLITICIZATION OF MEMORY THROUGH THE MONUMENT CULTURE
rci.mirovni-institut.si
In this article we will try to point out the differences between historical and individual memory. This distinction is found in memorial culture as one of the major media which assists the institutionalization of individual memories. We will see how history continually uses individual memories and puts them in the service of dominant ideology. At the same time, the rhetoric of government and educational system shapes collective memory and promotes specific versions of the past. Monumentalization of individual memories will be discussed as a first step in the politics of forgetting.
2014
This is the introduction to a collection of articles about the spatialization processes of memory of war in contemporary Europe. It is divided in three parts. The first part proposes a transdisciplinary perspective, which includes semiotics, to tackle the relations between space, war heritage and cultural memory and to analyse memory narratives conveyed by places. An approach based on the investigation of "terrorscapes" (places with a high density of traces) is proposed. The second part delves on the notion of terrorscapes, focusing on the meaning of "terror" and on the shift of paradigm in European politics of memory after 1989. The third part deals with the European space of memory, questioning the possibility of construction of a shared European memory narrative on XX centuries wars. The last paragraph summarizes the contributions of the volume.
Despite the progress of memory studies worldwide, the central role of memory has rarely been a topic of interest in Greek historiography. The aim of this article is to reconstitute the spatiality of the Holocaust in the micro perspective of the sites of memory of Second World War in Greece. The "biographies" of these sites of memory reveal the complicated historical, political, and aesthetic axes on which Jewish memory is being constructed, a point that I find very interesting to highlight, as sites of memory always seem to have changing lives and many dimensions.