Architecture and Archaeology Connections and oppositions 18/6/2021 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Azkarate, A. (2020) Archaeology of Architecture – Buildings Archaeology, in Charles E. Orser, Jr., Andrés Zarankin, Pedro Funari, Susan Lawrence, James Symonds, The Routledge Handbook of Global Historical Archaeology, 2020
There are those who believe that the perception of the multidimensionality of architecture is a contemporary conceptual conquest, arising from the interpretative current that followed the questioning of the processual perspective. There is nothing further from the truth. When calling for the semantic diversity of environments built as physical spaces, social spaces and symbolic spaces, one <loes nothing but revive Vitruvio's thinking when he alluded more than two thousand years ago to the three principles that should govern the architecture of public buildings (Vitruvius, 1999: !, 3): firmítas, as an expression of a society's socioeconomic and technological capacities to source, extract, transform, transport and harness raw materials; utilitas, as a reflection of the social, political and religious organization needed to articulate spaces of diverse functionalities and meanings; and finally, venustas, as the embodiment of his thought, his ideology. It is precisely for this reason that it is necessary that these principies combine for their materialization, which is why architecture has rightly been regarded as the ultimate expression of what we understand as material culture (Azkarate, 2013). It is therefore understandable that architectural evidence has been an ÜTesistible focus of attention for many scientific disciplines and that there are extraordinarily rich and varied approximations to the field of built heritage. We are, in short, facing a material reality that contains multiple dimensions, which can be observed on numerous scales, both temporal and spatial - from the mobile homes of hunter gatherers to the cityscape and landscape in general (Steadman, 2015) - and a reality which is usually analysed from the most va1ied theoretical perspectives (Buchli, 2013; Steadman, 2015; Beaudry, 2015). This explains 'the my1iad directions still available in the field ofthe archaeology of architecture' (Steadman, 2015: 18) and the unstoppable growth of a bibliographic production that is extremely difficult both to follow and to synthesize.
https://forum-bratsigovo.bg/en 12.09.2024 International Round Table "Archaeology and Architecture - Realizations and Perspectives" Presentation of cultural heritage sites in Bulgaria: - "Perperikon" - Prof. Nikolay Ovcharov - "Heraclea Syntyrica" - prof. Lyudmil Vagalinski/arch. Milena Kamenova - "Sveshtari" - prof. arch. Diana Gergova Presentation of cultural heritage sites in Italy: - Arh. Andrea Griletto, technical director of ASSORESTAURO, Italy - Engr. Vincenzo Calvanese, Technical Director Pompeii Archaeological Park - Arh. Stefano Borghini, Colosseum Archaeological Park, Rome - Dr. Alessandro Lugari, Colosseum Archaeological Park, Rome 13.09.2024 Association of Restorers in Italy - the mutual activity between archaeologists, architects, restorers and constructors - Arh. Andrea Griletto Colosseum Archaeological Park Rome - Arh. Stefano Borghini „Archaeology and architecture: sustainable development and perspectives in Pompeii Archaeological Park“ - Engr. Vincenzo Calvanese
Architectural Experimentations: New Meanings for Ancient Ruins
Architecture, 2024
Starting from the critical premises that underpin the debate between archeology and architecture, some evidence emerges: sometimes, the musealization of buildings, "urban carcasses" and historical ruins – which are our legacy from the past – is even more harmful than that of any other artefact, for the purposes of their real understanding. In a country like Italy, which has archeological presences more than any other, architecture must contribute to overcoming the consolidated aporia that the Contemporary, conceived not only as a period but also and above all as its "forms and functions", is structurally in opposition to the conservation of archeological heritage. "Spatium ad Omnes", the project presented in this article, is an attempted exercise at "inhabiting archaeology", that is, trying to re-grant inclusive usability to a historical fragment, which has lost the elements necessary for its liveability, paying attention to the reversibility of the project itself. The set of questions, doubts and steps preliminary for the design have been highlighted more than the final "figure" of the project: an essential form directly connected with the primordial principles of its constitution. "Spatium ad Omnes" protects and encourages visiting the complex, trying to offer new perspectives, new narratives and new connections that translate into the possibility of being – for those who visit this place – the protagonists of a unique experience made of history, memory and continuous discoveries.
The archaeology of architecture for the knowledge and preservation of the 'modern’
Restauro Archeologico
The aim of this research is to find new tools to know, understand and consequently preserve the most recent architec- tural heritage (20th–21th century). This particularly interesting heritage needs attention, often its state of degradation undermines its conservation. This need is evident not only in the Italian context but also in the western world. The 1972 Unesco Convention defined an initial concept and definition of Heritage, and this concept now became increasingly broader; today, more recent artefacts are now looked upon as elements to be protected, in the same way as older ones. The writer started this research, years ago, currently a close collaboration between DAD Genova and Universidad del Pais Vasco brought more enlightening. The objectives are: verification of the applicability of the tools already adopted in the archaeology of the architecture of traditional constructions and development of the specificities in the interpretation of contemporary constructions.
2019
This paper deals with the architectural sociology that is renewed subject yet remains neglected area in the field. This paper draws a bridge between architectural community and mundane society through the blending boundaries of architecture and archaeology through comparison between two Indian cities of ancient and modern architecture, certain conclusions are drawn to depict the correlation between built form and human behaviour and how both complement each other in ways that make it difficult to separate them as separate aims. To prove the lifestyles and ideologies, Space Syntax theories of Hiller and Hanson and Fisher theory of visibility are diagrammatically shown to draw a caricature of lives then and now.
Archeotecture: seeking a new archaeological vision of Architecture
On last decades Architecture gave rise to interesting approaches about new themes. A lot of theses subjects were hardly studied from traditional Archaeology. In this way, for example, architectural remains only were analysed starting from a formalist and typological approach, although its importance as material reflection of social processes. Today the need has been imposed to widen the perspectives of investigation, assimilating new lines which make it possible to maximise the information which comes from te constructed space. This need is justified by questions such as the inconsistency of studying the architectonic record, and overcoming the investigative tradition which even defended the impossibility of dealing with a social and integral interpretation of this record. Despite these conditioning factors, alternative studies and analytical instruments were developed recently in a new field of research, designed Architectural Archaeology. This discipline embrace different methodolgies: Formal analysis or primitive architecture; the study of vertical stratigraphy, particulary used in the studi of Mediaeval sites; the functional and symbolic analysis shich recognises the social factors and symbolic aspects of archietecture; the study of the symbolic use of space with non-verbal communication are all aspects which are dealt with in the study of the architecture of past societies. Therefore, Archeology of Architecture offers new methodologies of analysis for new visions about built record. However, actually it is necessary a theoretical and methodological systematisation which let to carry out a definition of Archaeology of Architecture like a specific work line within Archaeology. This is the main objective of this chapter. .
Beyond Paradigms in Cultural Astronomy. Proceedings of the 27th SEAC conference held together with the EAA. BAR Internationals Series 3033, 2021, pp. 37-43, 2021
ABSTRACT: (IN ITALIANO SOTTO) Archaeoastronomy can give an important contribution to Archaeology for a better understanding of the function and meaning of some ancient Roman buildings. I have a first-hand direct experience, and I will present two case studies, Hadrian's Villa in Tivoli (near Rome) and the Pantheon in Rome, both of the 2 nd century AD. They prove how Archaeoastronomy allowed us to go "beyond the paradigms", with a new and innovative approach in looking at ancient Roman monuments which have been studied for centuries, but somehow are still unknown as far as their function and meaning are concerned. RIASSUNTO: L'archeoastronomia può dare un importante contributo all'archeologia per una migliore comprensione della funzione e del significato di alcuni antichi edifici romani. Ho un'esperienza diretta di prima mano, e presenterò due casi di studio, la Villa Adriana a Tivoli (vicino Roma) e il Pantheon a Roma, entrambi del II secolo d.C. Dimostrano come l'Archeoastronomia ci abbia permesso di andare “oltre i paradigmi”, con un approccio nuovo e innovativo nell'esame dei monumenti antichi romani che sono stati studiati per secoli, ma in qualche modo rimangono ancora sconosciuti per quanto riguarda la loro funzione e significato.