Conclusion: Civic Security (original) (raw)
Related papers
SECURITY AND CITIZENS: NEW DEFINITIONS AND NEW PARTNERSHIPS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT
The unprecedented pace at which people, goods, finance and information are moving around the globe is changing both the structure and the values of our societies. Over the past three decades of economic and political restructuring, finance and trade have become the central organizing principles of civic life. Public governance is being fundamentally transformed as political power and social responsibility are simultaneously shifted upwards to trading blocs and global institutions, outwards to the private sector, and downwards onto local governments and private individuals .
Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 2018
This article explores the place of formal legal arrangements in the politics surrounding the hybrid, enmeshed public-in-the-private forms of authority this special issue focuses on. It does so by analyzing the significance of one specific legal arrangement, the Duty of Care, for the politics surrounding public-in-the-private forms of protection. I show that the Duty of Care does considerable political work. It contributes to decentering, commercializing, and depoliticizing protection. In so doing, the Duty of Care is justifying this specific form of protection, defining and extending its scope, and perpetuating it. The article makes this argument by drawing both on the legal discussion about the Duty of Care and on close observation of its presence in the Security and Counterterrorism Expo trade fair. It concludes that acknowledging the * Support from the Norwegian Research Council is gratefully acknowledged. Thank you also to the participants in the workshop, Duty of Care: Protecting Citizens Abroad (Clingendael June 17-18, 2016), to the editors of this special issue, Stefano Guzzini, and the participants in the doctoral seminar in international relations at the Graduate Institute Geneva for their careful reading and comments on an earlier version of this article. Finally, I wish to acknowledge the editorial team of the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies for their uncommonly thorough and professional support.
'MAKING'Security: Citizenship, Public Sphere and the Condition of Symbolic Annihilation
Presentation in Challenge: Liberty & Security, …, 2006
This paper explores the relationship between new forms of European governance, as expressed through security-focused policies, and the European citizen. It seeks to unravel the contextual framework within which the notion of civil liberties, citizens' participation in the democratisation of supranational and international politics, and the supranational governance are re-defined. The paper argues that the processes of 'securitisation' have an impact for the democratic functioning of citizenship by a) restricting the spaces and processes of action and communication among citizens b) restricting citizens' access to policymaking, in particular in highly sensitive areas, for their effect on civil liberties; and c) prioritising the executive branches of the European polity at the expense of representative politics and the judiciary. This combination of policy trends contributes to the 'symbolic annihilation' of EU citizens.
The End(s) of Community: History, Sovereignty, and the Question of Law.
This project focuses on the relationship between sovereignty, democracy and law. More particularly, I am interested in how the relationship between these concepts both founds law and maintains the distinction between lawful force and violence. In fact, the entire project could be read as beginning with a single and deceptively simple question, namely, what are the limits of law? How one chooses to answer this question determines the line that both unites and divides sovereignty and democracy, force and law. In particular my work examines how the tradition of western philosophy has accounted for the foundations of law, that is, for the movement from a 'state of nature' to political order. Traditionally the character of the 'sovereign' or 'lawgiver' has provided the solution to this problem. But, how does the sovereign acquire the right to found law? As soon as we ask this question we are immediately confronted with a convoluted combination of jurisprudence and theology. While it is possible to argue that this metaphysical component is merely a distraction and that the true basis of both sovereignty and the legal order is simply violence; such a hypothesis is fundamentally incomplete. By simply dismissing metaphysics as a façade one becomes unable to account for the series of structural effects that the foundational myth has within the system. In order to respond to this question my project undertakes a philosophical genealogy of the relationship between these fundamental concepts. I begin by tracing out a lengthy and deeply nuanced exchange between Derrida and Nancy on the question of community and fraternity. From this point I move on to in depth engagements with a diverse set of texts ranging from the Marquis de Sade and Saint Augustine to Kant, Hegel and Kafka. These texts-which range from the canonical to the apocryphal-all struggle with the question of the foundations of law in their own manner. Each offers a path to the law. If a reader accepts this path as it is and follows without question the law is set and determined and the possibility of dialogue is thus closed. My aim is to open the question of law within these texts by practicing an ethics of reading, which opens up the possibility of dialogue. Table of Contents Abbreviations 5 Preface 13 Abbreviations Agamben, Giorgio CC -The Coming Community. Trans. Michael Hardt.
At the Edges of Citizenship: Security and the Constitution of Non-citizen Subjects
Proposing a new, dynamic conception of citizenship, this book argues against understandings of citizenship as a collection of rights that can be either possessed or endowed, and demonstrates it is an emergent condition that has temporal and spatial dimensions. Furthermore, citizenship is shown to be continually and contingently reconstituted through the struggles between those considered insiders and outsiders. Significantly, these struggles do not result in a clear division between citizens and non-citizens, but in a multiplicity of states that are at once included within and excluded from the political community. These liminal states of citizenship are elaborated in relation to three specific forms of non-citizenship: the ‘respectable illegal, the ‘intimate foreigner’ and the ‘abject citizen’. Each of these modalities of citizenship corresponds to either the figure of the clandestino/a or the nomad as invoked in the 2008 Italian Security Package and a second set of laws, commonly referred to as the ‘Nomad Emergency Decree’. Exploring how this legislation affected and was negotiated by individuals and groups who were constituted as ‘objects of security’, author Kate Hepworth focuses on the first-hand experience of individuals deemed threats to the nation. Situated within the field of human geography, the book draws on literature from citizenship studies, critical security studies and migration studies to show how processes of securitisation and irregularisation work to delimit between citizens and non-citizens, as well as between legitimate and illegitimate outsiders.