Positioning place-making as a social process: A systematic literature review (original) (raw)
Related papers
Purpose – Many scholars have addressed the concept of place-making, yet there is still little formal knowledge about how major societal changes have influenced place-making. The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 is an earthshaking event that changed the world, with regard to geopolitics and the internationalisation of our cities and places, thus generating many urban and tourism developments. Therefore, this paper aims to analyse how the term “place-making” has been variously defined and developed as a concept since the time of the fall. Furthermore, it intends to assess whether such analysis can reveal potential competition and synergy for places between tourism and urban developments. Design/methodology/approach – To address these two questions, a systematic quantitative literature review of research published between 1991 and 2016 has been used, providing a 25 years overview that reveals the current trends in the research on this topic and highlights the gaps in the existing literature. Findings – Findings concerns the variety of definitions, demonstrating the complexity of place-making; four emerging topics (place-making and globalisation; participation; conflicts/challenges; and trendy strategies); and a lack of synergy between tourism and urban development regarding place-making. Research limitations/implications – The major limitation to this research is the language criterion, restricted to English, thus automatically eliminating articles written in any other languages. Practical implications – This paper can help key stakeholders to re-assess the place-making strategies in light of the findings. Social implications – This research demonstrates the emergence of new trends in place-making that need to be addressed to fulfil societal demands and own changes. It can be used as a basis to start reflection and further development for communities and a wide variety of stakeholders. Originality/value – The originality of this research resides in the 25-year overview that displays gaps and trends around place-making.
Exploring theoretical trends in placemaking: towards new perspectives in spatial planning
Journal of Place Management and Development, 2018
Purpose While placemaking is a multi-disciplinary concern, it is a key focus within the discipline of spatial planning. This paper aims to explore the development of theoretical trends with regard to placemaking in spatial planning since 1975 to identify current emerging theoretical perspectives. Special attention is given to differences in perspectives between the Global North and the Global South. Design/methodology/approach The study used an integrative literature review (ILR) to analyse placemaking literature over a period of 41 years and five months. The ILR followed the basic review stages: scoping; planning and review protocol; identification/availability; searching; and screening. ILR differs from other reviews as quality appraisal, data gathering, analysis and synthesis rely on coding, thematic content analysis and synthesis. Findings Initially, the planning/review protocol resulted in 59 contributions on placemaking in various disciplines (excluding publications in other l...
Place-making (entry of the Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies)
The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies , 2019
Place-making is an assemblage of related concepts and practices predicated on the phenomenon of place. Just as place continues to demand critical examination at specific times and locations and across different scales, place-making has also fluctuated between moments of reification as bounded territorial practices and phases of dematerialization that challenge parochial fixity. While global academic and professional practice has largely been shaped by the anglophone world and identifies the 1970s as the point of origin of place-making, the significance of place and place-making predates contemporary academic discourse and can be traced back to the cultures of the ancient Greeks, China, Aboriginals, precolonial North America and others. Nonetheless, as currently pursued in the disciplines of human geography, environmental psychology, and architecture and practiced in landscape architecture, urban design, and civil society, place-making is mostly built upon the work of scholars such as Jacquelin Burgess, Christian Norberg-Schulz, and David Seamon. In the 1970s, human geographers (Relph 1976; Tuan 1974) turned their attention to place as a phenomenon integral to the existence of human beings; and those investigations encouraged writing about place-making. Burgess wrote about it in The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies. Edited by Anthony Orum.
The Routledge Handbook of Placemaking Edited by Cara Courage, with
The Routledge Handbook of Placemaking Edited by Cara Courage, with, 2020
20% Discount Available-enter the code FLR40 at checkout (Hardback @ £190; ebook @£35.99) https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Handbook-of-Placemaking/Courage-Borrup-Jackson-Legge-Mckeown-Platt-Schupbach/p/book/9780367220518 This Handbook is the first to explore the field of placemaking in terms of the recent research, teaching and learning, and practice agenda for the next few years. Offering valuable theoretical and practical insights from the leading scholars and practitioners in the field, it provides cutting-edge interdisciplinary research on the placemaking sector. Placemaking has seen a paradigmatic shift in urban design, planning and policy to engage the community voice, This Handbook examines the development of placemaking, its emerging theories, and its future directions. The book is structured in seven distinct sections curated by experts in the areas concerned. • Section One provides a glimpse at the history and key theories of placemaking and its interpretations by different community sectors. • Section Two studies the transformative potential of placemaking practice through case studies on different places, methodologies, and theoretical frameworks. It also reveals placemaking's potential to nurture a holistic community engagement, social justice, and human-centric urban environments. • Section Three looks at the politics of placemaking to consider who is included and who is excluded from its practice and if the concept of placemaking needs to be reconstructed. • Section Four deals with the scales and scopes of art-based placemaking, moving from the city to the neighbourhood and further to the individual practice. It juxtaposes the voice of the practitioner and professional alongside that of the researcher and academic. • Section Five tackles the socioeconomic and environmental placemaking issues deemed pertinent to emerge more sustainable placemaking practices. • Section Six emphasizes placemaking's intersection with urban design and planning sectors and incudes case studies of generative planning practice. • Section Seven draws on the expertise of placemakers, researchers, and evaluators to present the key questions today, new methods and approaches to evaluation of placemaking in related fields, and notions for the future of evaluation practices. This seminal Handbook offers a timely contribution and international perspectives for the growing field of placemaking. It will be of interest to academics and students of placemaking, urban design, urban planning and policy, architecture, geography, cultural studies, and the arts.
Cross Disciplinary Review of Placemaking Literature: A Literature Mapping
This literature mapping focuses on place-making literature and presents a cross-disciplinary cut of current literature. As part of the mapping process, ‘literature mapping’ is developed as a methodology to produce a broad literature mapping in a limited timeframe. This working paper presents the research methodology by discussing its development processes (comparing and contrasting available academic indexes, their limitations and strengths, and recommendations on their future use). The mapping reviews the aspects of place-making literature through related concepts, emerging trends, sub-fields and emerging research interests from various disciplines. The results show an extensive interest in various disciplines in place-making as a concept and in its various aspects, as well as demonstrating the increasing interest in urban design literature in social and perceptual aspects of design.
Placemaking: The Power To Change
Journal of Biourbanism, 2017
Placemaking is an approach to designing and planning public spaces, including their management, which is becoming widespread not only in the United States but worldwide. The idea of placemaking is revolutionary because of its approach to urban issues that opens up new possibilities of participatory design. The focus of the practice is on the place, consequently on the community that uses and lives in it because public space symbolizes the “connective tissue” of communities, hence the importance of its care. This paper outlines the issues and major trends emerging from recent placemaking experiences.
Placemaking Revisited. Community Change, 1, 68-72, 2017
UN Habitat recently adopted its first public space resolution, which incentivizes international communities to employ placemaking strategies and encourage inclusive and sustainable community change through physical urban design. Scholars argue that healthy, creative, and walkable places, parks, and streets stimulate people’s interpersonal interactions and, supposedly, renovate abandoned, disenfranchised communities (Florida 2002; Glaeser 2011; Duany and Plater-Zyberk 1994). However, one needs to recognize the limits of this philosophy. With this explorative piece we aim to start a productive debate over questions related to whether genuine community change is possible through placemaking today. Can walkable, comfortable, interactive, and creative public space nurture equality, inclusion, and social justice? Does placemaking offer communities necessary safety nets to protect them from the negative effects of economic growth and market competition in cities? Or, is placemaking today merely one of the many marketing strategies helping cities compete for external investments in the era of neoliberal capitalism, especially when public services are undermined or completely diminished? In this piece, we briefly explore various effects of capital circulating through urban spaces and the complex interactions of actors involved in placemaking. We hope others will expand and build upon this introductory endeavor.
Trends and gaps in place-making in the context of urban development and tourism
Journal of Place Management and Development, 2019
Purpose Many scholars have addressed the concept of place-making, yet there is still little formal knowledge about how major societal changes have influenced place-making. The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 is an earthshaking event that changed the world, with regard to geopolitics and the internationalisation of our cities and places, thus generating many urban and tourism developments. Therefore, this paper aims to analyse how the term “place-making” has been variously defined and developed as a concept since the time of the fall. Furthermore, it intends to assess whether such analysis can reveal potential competition and synergy for places between tourism and urban developments. Design/methodology/approach To address these two questions, a systematic quantitative literature review of research published between 1991 and 2016 has been used, providing a 25 years overview that reveals the current trends in the research on this topic and highlights the gaps in the existing literature...
Revisiting the “Model of Place”: A Comparative Study of Placemaking and Sustainability
Urban Planning, 2019
The literature on sustainability policies and placemaking strategies reveals the inadequacy of both concepts to address current urban issues suggesting the need for new approaches. Sustainability researchers and policy makers are seeking an integrated approach to sustainability within which placemaking is a powerful tool in achieving sustainability goals. However, despite this rising awareness of place and its value, there is growing concern that the value of place and its urban meaning is declining. Placemaking appears to have changed from being an authentic everyday practice to a professional responsibility, and the understanding of the intangible character of place is mainly lost in the modern making of places. The emphasis of designers on physical design attributes assumes a fragile model of causality, underestimating the other necessary components for placemaking—behaviour and meaning. Comparing models of sustainability and place, this article suggests that there is need for a ...