White Supremacist Terrorism in Charlottesville: Reconstructing ‘Unite the Right’ (original) (raw)
Related papers
Charlottesville and the Growth of White Identity Politics
As a sociologist who has done research on hate speech online and studied White Nationalist organizations, I believe that our national discussions about these events are problematic. We are trying to explain things with simplistic explanations. I believe that this simplicity will prevent us from identifying proper causes and anticipating future effects.
From Twitter to Charlottesville: Analyzing the Fighting Words Between the Alt-Right and Antifa
International Journal of Communication, 2019
This study examines the Twitter rivalry of two groups of the alt-Right and antifascist movement to understand how certain appeals, launched through social media, may promote material violence. Several studies have explored the impact of extreme political rhetoric in motivating hostile responses, such as the one that erupted at the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. The present study contributes to this literature by examining how Twitter can offer a staging ground for political hostilities to swell, circulate, and sometimes activate the call for confrontation. A textual analysis deconstructs the Twitter accounts of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers and Antifa over a six-week-period culminating in the violent Charlottesville rally. A focus on the groups’ framing of the opposition and use of persuasive appeals offers insight into the priming nature of political extremism happening on Twitter today.
ARTICLES: CONCEPTUAL Reckoning with Hate: Faithful Routes Away from the Charlottesville Rally
Social Work & Christianity, 2020
Ripples of both alarm and hope regarding United States race relations have circled out from Charlottesville, Virginia subsequent to violent demonstrations held on August 11 and 12, 2017. This article tells less well-known stories out of Charlottesville, recounting faith groups’ prayers and vigils through the summer of 2017, and one Christian social work educator’s experience of witness with her faith community during the August 12th rally. The article also highlights several loving and creative responses that individuals, groups, and organizations made on August 12th and in the subsequent year after the rally to assist the injured, address the trauma, and begin to rebuild a sense of safety and normalcy in the community. The unfolding Charlottesville story offers an anti-racist case study of one community’s efforts under extreme conditions to reconcile and heal racist wounds.
2018
Far-right radicalisation and social media are subjects that are increasingly addressed in a joint fashion. However, a nuanced understanding of the features of this relationship remain elusive due to their novelty, research emphasis in large organisations, and the difficulty to access radical groups and individuals. Online media outlets are one of the few channels through which these features can be addressed, yet their lecture is affected by critical sociopolitical contexts and their own political agendas. Consequently, to understand the debate between far-right radicalisation and social media expansion I, first, examined the way in which online media outlets portray the three key elements of their relationship – social media, the far-right, and the process of radicalisation – and, second, I examined the way in which these portrayals shape the debate itself. By cross-analysing 24 articles from the UK and the US with 19 in-depth analytical questions I established three common “strugg...
SOCIETY, 2018
In the aftermath of the 2017 Charlottesville tragedy, the prevailing narrative is a Manichean division between 'white supremacists' and 'anti-racists'. We suggest a more complicated, nuanced reality. While the so-called 'Alt-Right' includes those pursuing an atavistic political end of racial and ethnic separation, it is also characterised by pluralism and a strategy of nonviolent dialogue and social change, features associated with classic liberalism. The 'Left,' consistent with its historic mission, opposes the Alt-Right's racial/ethnic prejudice; but, a highly visible movement goes farther, embracing an authoritarianism that would forcibly exclude these voices from the public sphere. This authoritarian element has influenced institutions historically committed to free expression and dialogue, notably universities and the ACLU. We discuss these paradoxes by analysing the discourse and actions of each movement, drawing from our study of hundreds of posts and articles on Alt-Right websites and our online exchanges on a leading site (AltRight.com). We consider related news reports and scholarly research, concluding with the case for dialogue.
“We Act As One Lest We Perish Alone”: A Case Study in Mediated White Nationalist Activism
This article provides a case study of mediated white nationalist activism, focusing on how white nationalists circulate affects to reinforce and grow the movement. The article examines a group called EuropeanUnity565 (EU565) which maintained several social media accounts, most prominently a YouTube channel, to distribute white nationalist video content which they subtitled in English and other European languages. Intended to foster racial harmony across ethno-linguistic lines in order to resist perceived racial imperilment-a sentiment captured in their motto, "We act as one lest we perish alone"-EU565's activism fits into a larger tradition of urging the importance of racial community and belonging. The article thus also situates EU565 within a broader tradition of white nationalist activism called metapolitics. The potential for this networked activism, of which EU565 is only a part, to reach larger publics makes research in this area important, a task to which this case study contributes.
2017
The present contribution examines the use of lingua franca in a transnation-al computer mediated corpus, focusing on the extreme-right Greek political party Golden Dawn. Our data include the visual identities, pseudonyms and verbal comments of discussants. We investigate the processes through which an emergent common ground is built in this on-line far-right discourse, mainly through co-constructed salient lexical and conceptual units. This salience helps proximise emotions and in particular the notion of a threat which is at the heart of far-right discourse argumentation. We shed light on the discursive strategies put in place on the individual level with a view to creating, perpetuating and strengthening the immanency and closeness of the threat, which allegedly legitimises a particular course of action. When comparing our findings with the results of previous studies focused on other Greek and French data we argue, on the basis of the presence of common features, for the existence of a dedicated lingua franca which could be called (extreme)-right newspeak.