Quality assessment of studies included in Cochrane oral health systematic reviews (original) (raw)
Quality Assessment of Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Oral Health Systematic Reviews
Erfan Shamsoddin
2021
View PDFchevron_right
Evaluation of risk of bias assessment of trials in systematic reviews of oral health interventions, 1991-2014
Susan Armijo-Olivo
The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Quality Assessment of Studies Included in Cochrane Oral Health Systematic Reviews: A Meta-Research
Bita Mesgarpour
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Systematic reviews in oral health: A quality imperative
Zbys Fedorowicz
Journal of evidence-based medicine, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
A Descriptive Analysis of Oral Health Systematic Reviews Published 1991–2012: Cross Sectional Study
Greta G Cummings, Susan Armijo-Olivo, Maryam Amin
PLoS ONE, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Randomized clinical trials in dentistry: Risks of bias, risks of random errors, reporting quality, and methodologic quality over the years 1955-2013
Susan Armijo-Olivo
PloS one, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health: the CONSORT statement
Jean-Michel Brismée
American journal of dentistry, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Methodological characteristics and treatment effect sizes in oral health randomised controlled trials: Is there a relationship? Protocol for a meta-epidemiological study
Greta G Cummings, Susan Armijo-Olivo, Maryam Amin
BMJ open, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Randomized controlled trials: The apple of researchers′ eyes in oral health
Tatiana Pereira-Cenci
Journal of Restorative Dentistry, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS).
Zbys Fedorowicz
View PDFchevron_right
Quality of cluster randomized controlled trials in oral health: a systematic review of reports published between 2005 and 2009
Karla Diaz Ordaz
… Dentistry and Oral …, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Papageorgiou SN, Antonoglou G, Tsiranidou E, Jepsen S, Jäger A. Bias and small-study effects influence treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study in oral medicine. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:984-992.
Spyridon Papageorgiou
View PDFchevron_right
Quality of randomised controlled trials in dentistry
Mauro Farella
International Dental Journal, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals
Theodore Eliades
Journal of Dentistry, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Impact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study
Maryam Amin
Journal of dental research, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
The assessment of systematic reviews in dentistry
Marco Esposito
European Journal of Oral Sciences, 2003
View PDFchevron_right
The search and selection for primary studies in systematic reviews published in dental journals indexed in MEDLINE was not fully reproducible
marco alarcon
Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
World Workshop on Oral Medicine IV: Process and methodology for systematic review and developing management recommendations
Lorena Baccaglini
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Influence of blinding on treatment effect size estimate in randomized controlled trials of oral health interventions
Susan Armijo-Olivo
BMC medical research methodology, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
A multiyear systematic survey of the quality of reporting for randomised trials in dentistry, neurology and geriatrics published in journals of Spain and Latin America
Constanza Barrera Riquelme
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: A cross-sectional study
I. Boutron, Philippe Ravaud
2013
View PDFchevron_right
Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design
lorenzo bertizzolo
BMJ Open, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Assessing the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials in the field of dentistry indexed in the Lilacs (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde) database
Paola Okuda
Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Significance bias: an empirical evaluation of the oral health literature
Joseph Gakonyo
BMC Oral Health, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Systematic Reviews in Dental Research. A Guideline
Andrea López Antonio
Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Methodologic quality and risk-of-bias in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a review of methods
Júlia Meller Dias de Oliveira
Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 2022
View PDFchevron_right
Bias and small-study effects influence treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study in oral medicine
Georgios Antonoglou
View PDFchevron_right
Methodological characteristics and treatment effect sizes in oral health randomised controlled trials: Is there a relationship?
Maryam Amin
2014
View PDFchevron_right
Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research
Greta G Cummings, Susan Armijo-Olivo
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2012
View PDFchevron_right