Methodological characteristics and treatment effect sizes in oral health randomised controlled trials: Is there a relationship? (original) (raw)
Methodological characteristics and treatment effect sizes in oral health randomised controlled trials: Is there a relationship? Protocol for a meta-epidemiological study
Greta G Cummings, Susan Armijo-Olivo, Maryam Amin
BMJ open, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Papageorgiou SN, Antonoglou G, Tsiranidou E, Jepsen S, Jäger A. Bias and small-study effects influence treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study in oral medicine. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:984-992.
Spyridon Papageorgiou
View PDFchevron_right
An assessment of quality characteristics of randomised control trials published in dental journals
Theodore Eliades
Journal of Dentistry, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Randomized controlled trials: The apple of researchers′ eyes in oral health
Tatiana Pereira-Cenci
Journal of Restorative Dentistry, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Bias and small-study effects influence treatment effect estimates: a meta-epidemiological study in oral medicine
Georgios Antonoglou
View PDFchevron_right
Impact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study
Maryam Amin
Journal of dental research, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Influence of blinding on treatment effect size estimate in randomized controlled trials of oral health interventions
Susan Armijo-Olivo
BMC medical research methodology, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
Methodological issues in oral health research: intervention studies
Helen Whelton
Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Evaluation of risk of bias assessment of trials in systematic reviews of oral health interventions, 1991-2014
Susan Armijo-Olivo
The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health: the CONSORT statement
Jean-Michel Brismée
American journal of dentistry, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Quality of randomised controlled trials in dentistry
Mauro Farella
International Dental Journal, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Design and statistical analysis of oral medicine studies: common pitfalls
Lorena Baccaglini
Oral Diseases, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Quality of cluster randomized controlled trials in oral health: a systematic review of reports published between 2005 and 2009
Karla Diaz Ordaz
… Dentistry and Oral …, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies
Julie Pildal
Health Technology Assessment, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ?meta-epidemiological? research
Peter Juni
Statistics in Medicine, 2002
View PDFchevron_right
Quality Assessment of Clinical Trials Included in Cochrane Oral Health Systematic Reviews
Erfan Shamsoddin
2021
View PDFchevron_right
No evidence for intervention-dependent influence of methodological features on treatment effect
Wilco Jacobs
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Randomized clinical trials in dentistry: Risks of bias, risks of random errors, reporting quality, and methodologic quality over the years 1955-2013
Susan Armijo-Olivo
PloS one, 2017
View PDFchevron_right
Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: Meta-epidemiological study
I. Boutron, Philippe Ravaud
2013
View PDFchevron_right
Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials
Kenneth Schulz
2012
View PDFchevron_right
Do statistical heterogeneity methods impact the results of meta- analyses? A meta epidemiological study
Samer Mheissen
PloS one, 2024
View PDFchevron_right
Quality assessment of studies included in Cochrane oral health systematic reviews
Erfan Shamsoddin
2020
View PDFchevron_right
An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
Zbys Fedorowicz
Journal of Applied Oral Science, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
A protocol for a systematic review investigating the factors influencing the statistical planning, design, conduct, analysis and reporting of trials
Marina Zaki
HRB Open Research, 2020
View PDFchevron_right
Are Sample Sizes Clear and Justified in RCTs Published in Dental Journals?
d. koletsi
PLoS ONE, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Papageorgiou SN, Xavier GM, Cobourne MT. Basic study design influences treatment effect when undertaking clinical orthodontic investigations. J Clin Epidemiol 2015. [Epub ahead of print]
Spyridon Papageorgiou
View PDFchevron_right
Randomized controlled trials: what are they and who needs them?
Albert Kingman
Periodontology 2000, 2012
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies
Anna-bettina Haidich
JAMA, 2001
View PDFchevron_right
Evaluation of dental trials comparing baseline differences using p values
Mahesh Khairnar
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Commentary: Which meta-analyses are conclusive?
Peter Juni
International Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
Empirical Evidence of Associations between Trial Quality and Effect Size
Susanne Hempel
View PDFchevron_right
Significance bias: an empirical evaluation of the oral health literature
Joseph Gakonyo
BMC Oral Health, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
Common Methodological Problems in Randomized Controlled Trials of Preventive Interventions
Pamela Buckley
Prevention Science, 2021
View PDFchevron_right
How should we use and evaluate evidence to improve population oral health
Professor Sarah Baker
Dental Clinics of North America, 2018
View PDFchevron_right