Michael McConnell's comments on the judicial review paper (original) (raw)

Foreword Judicial Confirmations and the Rule of Law

Roger Pilon

View PDFchevron_right

Remarks of Seth P. Waxman at the Memorial Observance for Justice Byron R. White, United States Supreme Court

Seth Waxman

2003

View PDFchevron_right

Foreword Justice Scalia's Originalism: Original or Post-New Deal?

Roger Pilon

View PDFchevron_right

A Tribute to Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.: His Use of Scientific Evidence in Constitutional Adjudication

Dean Hashimoto

Washburn Law Journal, 1991

View PDFchevron_right

The Puzzling Resistance to Judicial Review of the Legislative Process, 91 BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 1915 (2011)

Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov

View PDFchevron_right

The Obama Judge and the Foundations of the Rule of Law

Bruce Ledewitz

2018

View PDFchevron_right

The controversial intellectual giant of our time: a note on the late Justice Antonin Scalia

John Magyar

View PDFchevron_right

“Remarkable Influence”: The Unexpected Importance of Justice Scalia\u27s Deceptively Unanimous and Contested Majority Opinions

Eric Nystrom

2021

View PDFchevron_right

Book Review Essay: Nine Scorpions in a Bottle: A Review and Synthesis of Four Titles Related to an In-depth Examination of the U.S. Supreme Court

Robert Worley

Criminal Justice Review, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Judicial Review by the Burger and Rehnquist Courts: Explaining Justices' Responses to Constitutional Challenges

Stefanie Lindquist

Political Research Quarterly, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

How Conservative is the Rehnquist Court--Three Issues, One Answer

Staci Rosche

Fordham Law Review, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

Competing Conceptions of the Law: Public Arguments Regarding Nominees to the United States Supreme Court

John Katsulas

1989

View PDFchevron_right

Anthony M. Kennedy: A Study of His Judicial Opinions

Jeanette Nyden

1990

View PDFchevron_right

FOREWORD Politics and Law, Again

Roger Pilon

2006

View PDFchevron_right

Justifications of Judicial Review and Recommendations for its Proper Practice (1988/2022)

Paul Bullen

View PDFchevron_right

Testimony of Professor Burt Neuborne New York University Law School before the Subcommittee on Oversight of the House Judiciary Committee March 19, 1987

Burt Neuborne

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 1988

View PDFchevron_right

Siskel and Ebert at the Supreme Court

Samuel Estreicher

Michigan Law Review, 1989

View PDFchevron_right

Reevaluating the Implications of Decision-Making Models The Role of Summary Decisions in US Supreme Court Analysis Author(s): Ali

Ali Masood

View PDFchevron_right

Testimony of Rebecca Ingber Before the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary On the Nomination of Brett Kavanaugh for Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court

Rebecca Ingber

2018

View PDFchevron_right

The real Clarence Thomas: Confirmation veracity meets performance reality

Joyce Baugh

2000

View PDFchevron_right

A rejoinder to Richard Bellamy (On the republican core of the case for judicial review)

Tom Hickey

International Journal of Constitutional Law , 2019

View PDFchevron_right

“Remarkable Influence”: The Unexpected Importance of Justice Scalia's Deceptively Unanimous and Contested Majority Opinions

Eric Nystrom

The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

Justice John Marshall Harlan: Lectures on Constitutional Law, 1897-98

Brian Frye

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000

View PDFchevron_right

Writing in the Margins: Brennan, Marshall, and the Inherent Weaknesses of Liberal Judicial Decision-Making

Donna Coltharp

. Mary's LJ, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

Judicial Review by the Burger and Rehnquist Courts

Rorie Solberg

Political Research Quarterly, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Writing in the Margins: Brennan, Marshall, and the Inherent Weaknesses of Liberal Judicial Decision-Making (essay)

Donna Coltharp

St. Mary's Law Journal, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

Roger K. Newman, editor, The Yale Biographical Dictionary of American Law, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 2009. Pp. xiii + 622. $65.00 (ISBN 978-0-300-11300-6)

Steven Macias

Law and History Review, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

What We Did Not Know About Judicial Review: On Keith Whittington's "repugnant laws

Leslie F Goldstein

Constitutional commentary, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

452 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

Clarice Regala

View PDFchevron_right

The American Political Science Association

Manuel Avalos

Michigan Law Review, 1904

View PDFchevron_right

Another Look at Press Coverage of the Supreme Court

Everette Dennis

Villanova law review, 1974

View PDFchevron_right

A Principled Reason to Oppose the Confirmation of Neil Gorsuch

Peter M Shane

2018

View PDFchevron_right

A Conversation with Justice Stevens

Linda Greenhouse

2011

View PDFchevron_right

Brief of Political Scientists and Historians as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent, National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. Noel Canning, No. 12-1281, United States Supreme Court (Nov. 25, 2013)

Jeremy Rabkin

National Labor Relations Board Petitioner V Noel Canning No 12 1281 United States Supreme Court, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Index to the Journal of Supreme Court History Volumes 1-35 (1976-2010)

Joel Fishman

Journal of Supreme Court History, 2012

View PDFchevron_right