CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS AND TESTS OF INSENSITIVITY TO SCOPE (original) (raw)

Insensitivity to Scope in Contingent Valuation Studies

Jes Lindholt

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation

Thomas Heberlein

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

On Scope Effects in Contingent Valuation: Does the Statistical Distributional Assumption Matter?

Andrea Baranzini

SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000

View PDFchevron_right

Extending the scope of the scope test in choice experiment studies

Berit Hasler

View PDFchevron_right

Cognition, communication, and survey measurement: some implications for contingent valuation surveys

Norbert Schwarz

1997

View PDFchevron_right

Scope Insensitivity and the “Mere Token” Effect

Oleg Urminsky

Journal of Marketing Research, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Identifying the scope effect on a meta-analysis of biodiversity valuation studies

elena ojea

Resource and Energy Economics, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

On the adequacy of scope test results: Comments on Desvousges, Mathews, and Train

Michael Hanemann

Ecological Economics, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Improving scope sensitivity in contingent valuation: Joint and separate evaluation of health states

jose luis pinto prades

Health economics, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Scope Effects in Contingent Valuation: Does the Assumed Statistical Distribution of WTP Matter?

David Maradan

Ecological Economics

View PDFchevron_right

Scope elasticity and economic significance in discrete choice experiments

Kristine Grimsrud

2020

View PDFchevron_right

Visible Choice Sets and Scope Sensitivity in Contingent Values

Ian Bateman

2001

View PDFchevron_right

A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation

Darryl Weatherhead, Thomas Stevens

Environmental & Resource Economics, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Elicitation Format and Part-Whole Bias: Do Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys and Stated Preference Experiments Give the Same Results?

Vivien Foster

1998

View PDFchevron_right

Scope Elasticity of Willingness to pay in Discrete Choice Experiments

Kristine Grimsrud

Environmental and Resource Economics, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum

Robert Johnston

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management - J ENVIRON ECON MANAGE, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Scope insensitivity in contingent valuation of complex environmental amenities

Knut Veisten, Hans Hoen

Journal of Environmental Management, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

The Impact of Perceived Justice on Contingent Value Judgments

Harald A Mieg

Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Is Hypothetical Bias a Universal Phenomenon? A Multinational Investigation

Mariah Ehmke

Land Economics, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

The accuracy, applicability and transferability of contingent valuation measures for nonmarket goods

Robert Berrens

1993

View PDFchevron_right

Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies

Geoffrey Kerr, Guy Garrod

Ecological Economics, 1995

View PDFchevron_right

Exploring Divergence Between Respondent and Researcher Definitions of the Good in Contingent Valuation Studies

Susan Chilton

Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

2004. “Explaining Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Further Investigation Using Meta-Analysis.” Economics Bulletin

Robert Berrens

2014

View PDFchevron_right

Hypothetical bias in dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies

Michael Ash

University of Massachusetts …, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Testing the validity of responses to contingent valuation questioning

Jeff Bennett

The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Test of Scope in Contingent-Valuation Studies: Are the Numbers for the Birds

Kevin Boyle

2000

View PDFchevron_right

Is More Information Always Better? The Effect of Information on the Validity of Contingent Va I ua t ions

Benito Müller

1997

View PDFchevron_right

The issue of scope in contingent valuation studies

Robert Mitchell

American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1993

View PDFchevron_right

Trust, Responsibility and the Interpretation of Contingent Valuation Results

Russell Blamey

Australian Economic Papers, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Examining the Role of Social Isolation on Stated Preferences

Robert Berrens

American Economic Review, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Decisiveness, attitude expression and symbolic responses in contingent valuation surveys1

Russell Blamey

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

The contingent valuation debate: why economists should care

Rovena Troplini

The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1994

View PDFchevron_right

Bid design and its influence on the stated willingness to pay in a contingent valuation study

Carmen Carmona-Torres

2006 Annual Meeting, …, 2006

View PDFchevron_right