The JAMA Peer Review Report for 2000 (original) (raw)

Researchers’ time should be protected as much as possible – commentary on: Toroser D, Carlson J, Robinson M, et al. Factors impacting time to acceptance and publication for peer-reviewed publications. Curr Med Res Opinion 2016: published online 31 December 2016, doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271778

Alvisa Palese

Current Medical Research and Opinion

View PDFchevron_right

Peer review time: how late is late in a small medical journal?

Matko Marušić

Archives of Medical Research, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Evaluation of Issues Affecting Time Between Study Completion, Manuscript Submission, Acceptance, and Publication in Medical Journals

Ankita Kulkarni

Cureus, 2022

View PDFchevron_right

The peer review process in an academic journal.

Alison Richardson

European Journal of Oncology …, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Journal response types and times: the outcomes of manuscripts finalised for submission by the University of the Free State School of Medicine medical editor, South Africa

Johan Botes

Pan African Medical Journal, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

Ups and downs of peer review.

Robert Mans, Mauro Chaves

View PDFchevron_right

Medical Journal Peer Review: Process and Bias

Laxmaiah Manchikanti

Pain Physician, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

The peer-review process in medical publishing: a reviewer's perspective

Frank Sellke

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

The Important Role of Peer Review Sources and Their Various Functions in Improving to International Journals Standards

DR. V.THANGAVEL PhD DTh

Information Theory & Research eJournal Vol 4, Issue 38, August 03, 2023

View PDFchevron_right

Early editorial manuscript screening versus obligate peer review: A randomized trial

Robert Messing

Annals of Neurology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

JAMA Peer Reviewers in 2004

Mitchell Barnett

2016

View PDFchevron_right

Peer Review – Essential For Article and Journal Scientific Assessment and Validity.pdf

Izet Masic, MD, PhD, FWAAS, FEASA, FIAHSI, FEFMI, FACMI

View PDFchevron_right

Eighth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication

Hyun Jung Yi

Science Editing, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Relationship between the duration of peer-review, publication decision, and agreement among reviewers in three Chilean journals

Carlos González Vergara

2015

View PDFchevron_right

An Introduction to Reviewing Research Articles for Academic Journals

Edward Griffin

HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine

View PDFchevron_right

The ups and downs of peer review

José Chaves

AJP: Advances in Physiology Education, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Reflections on the Peer Review Process in Journal Publication

Francis McGuire

Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 1986

View PDFchevron_right

The challenges of peer-review process

sanjukta bhaumik

International Journal of Applied Research, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Attitudes of physicians and scientists to peer reviewing for biomedical journals: A survey from the Middle East and Africa

Salem Beshyah

Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

The peer review process in medical research: positive and negative effects on scientific advancement

Nuria Edo

uv.es

View PDFchevron_right

From the Editors’ Desk: Peer Review Now and in the Future

Andem I Effiong (Snr.)

Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

Scientific Writing, Peer Review, and Turning Lemons Into Lemonade

Jaynelle Stichler

HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Peer Review – Essential for Article and Journal Scientific Assessment and Validity

Izet Masic, MD, PhD, FWAAS, FEASA, FIAHSI, FEFMI, FACMI

View PDFchevron_right

DISCUSSION of “Editorial—The peer-review system: prospects and challenges”

Cedo Maksimovic

Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals

Elizabeth Boyd

The Medical Journal of Australia, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

JAMA Network Open Peer Reviewers in 2020

Chenue Abongwa

2021

View PDFchevron_right

Reviewing for the Journal: History, Theory, Methods, and Tools

Roberto Aaron Ramirez Ojeda

American Journal of Public Health, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

On the Review Process and Journal Development

Steven Floyd

Journal of Management Studies, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Statistical analysis of the National Institutes of Health peer review system

Valen Johnson

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

[Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article]

Matko Marusic

Lijec̆nic̆ki vjesnik

View PDFchevron_right

The next generation of peer reviewing

Naupaka Zimmerman

… in Ecology and …, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

What can we do to improve the peer review system? – A short survey of Food Technology and Biotechnology peer reviewers' experience

Iva Grabarić Andonovski

2019

View PDFchevron_right