The Chinese vs Western Media Framing on Uygur Conflict (original) (raw)
Related papers
Social realities are discursive constructs, so that attitudes and representations are the reflection of an informative approach. In this sense, the cultural and linguistic gaps between different civilizations, together with a discursive construction of a war nature, could be creating the ground for a continuous confrontation between East and West. The present study analyzes the different rhetorical frames of the international news agencies Reuters, Al Arabiya, Al Jazeera and Associated Press about the terrorist attack at the Istanbul (Turkey) airport on July 28, 2016. A quantitative study of the figures speech and the most repeated topics in the headlines of the attack is carried out. The power of the media in public opinion and the construction of reality generate a discussion about how these news are spread and their effects. The objective is to compare the different rhetorical frames in both civilizations and to identify if stereotypes are projected and if this framing contributes to the spectacularization of the conflict. The main result is that there are no significant discursive differences, which leads to the conclusion that east-west rhetorical figures are used to produce a certain effect in the population, among those that highlight the euphemisms, dysphemisms, demonization and discursive polarization, resources that serve to emphasize fear and create even larger gaps of social significance.
Indo-Pak Kashmir Conflict: Chinese Media Framing and Evolving Perspective
Journal of Political Studies, 2020
By adopting framing theory, this study examines the coverage of two Englishlanguage Chinese newspapers, namely China Daily and Global Times, on the current happenings in Indian held Kashmir (IHK) and escalations on Line of Control (LoC) to cognise Beijing‟s official perspective as a third key stakeholder of the valley. Content analysis is employed for a statistical analysis of dominant frames used by the Chinese press vis-à-vis the Indo-Pak Kashmir conflict in news reports from August 5 (annulment of Article 370 of the Indian constitution) to September 30, 2019 (last day of the 74th UNGA‟s session held at the United Nations). Findings suggest that both newspapers used almost similar frames for the Kashmir problem, nevertheless, with a difference in the ratio of coverage. Leadership frame was frequently used in the mediated texts, followed by conflict, peace, and responsibility frames, with primarily „episodic‟ reportage, which echoed that delays in IHK‟s resolution will have grave i...
SHS Web of Conferences i-COME'16, 2017
Loss of identity is a leading cause of terrorism and a common bewilderment of Mainland China and Taiwan. Cutting into the research by the news representation of Chinese terrorism incidents, this paper discusses a special identity issue in a special identity history. This paper adopts mixed methods, which are constructed by content analysis, framing discourses and frequency statistics. 111 pieces of related news are selected and doubly-coded into both "identity package" and "news framing". The results show that the news representations interconnect with the coexisting identity and confrontation between Mainland China and Taiwan.
Representing the 'Other': The Framing of China in BBC English and Urdu Online News
Journal of Media Sciences, 2022
Having established its economic power globally, China is now also asserting its soft power in the international symbolic representational realm-largely dominated by the West. This paper critically evaluates how BBC discursively constructs China in its Online English and Urdu News, and discusses its attendant social, political, and economic implications for the Chinese and Pakistani citizens in particular, and for people all over the world. We also discuss how does the West perceive China's efforts to establish a global soft image and what role BBC plays in it. Using a combination of research tools; Framing, Authorship and Sourcing, the study analyzed 115 news stories. The analysis revealed that 'China-Threat' is the dominant frame in BBC's coverage of China. Second, all stories were written by correspondents stationed outside China. Finally, BBC disproportionately cited Western news/expert sources, and also many sources/reports were unspecified (anonymous). The aim of this paper is to prompt readers to question commonly held assumptions of China propagated mostly by Western media.
Journalism Studies, 2020
Triangulating several methods including automated framing analysis and assessment of textual elements, this study examines how the elite press from three countries frames the Rohingya refugee crisis in 2017. Results from our framing and textual analysis show differences in how the press from the three countries portrayed the crisis. Specifically, The Irrawaddy (Myanmar) tends to incorporate a nationalist narrative into news content, playing down the violence used against Rohingyas. The New Nation (Bangladesh) frames the crisis according to the country's priorities, focusing its coverage on the humanitarian aspects of the crisis. The New York Times uses a Western hegemonic discourse. Textual analysis indicates that although the same words are used in the frames of the Rohingya crisis, some represent different meanings. Findings are discussed using the lens of ideological and cultural influence.
News Framing of the Rohingya Crisis Settlement: a Study on Aljazeera and BBC
2020
This study aims to discover how Aljazeera and BBC TV channels framed the Rohingya crisis settlements that were spent by national and international bodies. The content analysis was implemented by following mixed method approach. The results were obtained from the qualitative analysis of Aljazeera and BBC news, as well as the statistical quantitative results. The findings showed that news framing is capable of shaping certain attitudes toward incidents. Three main frames were utilized in the news coverage of Aljazeera and BBC: responsibility, human impact, and powerlessness frames. The findings are valuable to news organizations and reporters in framing minority crisis news. It may also assist audiences to critically understand the frames that shaped the crisis settlement news, and thereby enable them to further understand how media frame incidents and conflicts.
Monde Chinois Nouvelle Asie, 2020
This article examines the systematic framing of Uyghur-related violent unrest in Xinjiang as terrorism by the Chinese state. The study draws attention to how Uyghur-related violent incidents in the region-and elsewhere in China-are often not so premeditated, political, and indiscriminate as their framing as terrorism by the Chinese state suggests. Narrative tensions are identified between the features of such events and dominant scholarly conceptualizations of terrorism as a category of organized violence that targets 'civilians' for political purposes. The article argues that the Chinese state uses an actor-based one-size-fits-all approach by which Uyghur-related violence is represented as terrorism not by virtue of the features of the violence, but because of the ethnicity of those involved. Such an approach, the article concludes, is analytically deceptive and politically delusional.
How Newspapers In China, India And Bangladesh Framed The Rohingya Crisis Of 2017
2018
The Rohingya persecution in Myanmar's Rakhine state in 2017 attracted intense international media attention. In light of normative theory, media of different countries are assumed to cover an issue differently because of differences in the socio-political systems involved. This study examines how media from three different countries framed the Rohingya Muslim issue. These systematic and qualitative content analyses of six newspapers from three neighboring countries-China, India and Bangladeshexamines media framing of Myanmar in light of Robinson's (2001) Policy-Media Interaction model. The timeframe of the study was one month, starting on the first day of Myanmar's Rohingya crisis on August 25, 2017. The results of 50 qualitatively analyzed news reports and 258 quantitatively analyzed news reports found significant differences in the style of covering the Rohingya issue by the media of three neighboring countries. In Indian and Bangladeshi newspapers the human interest and protest frame emerged as the most important frame, while Chinese media used the conflict and security frame most. In Bangladesh, aid agencies appeared to be the most cited sources in newspapers while in Indian newspapers, national officials were cited most. The Myanmar government appeared top in the list of source used in Chinese newspapers. iii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my loving wife Shohana Begum, without whose tireless encouragement and support I could not pursue my degree. During the two years of study, she took on a lot of troubles, fighting the odds in life alone and taking care of our two daughters, allowing me to stay 8,412 miles away to pursue the degree.
This study examined the coverage of the July 2012 events in Gorno- Badakhshan Autonomous Oblast in the three types of media, namely international media, local independent media and state official media. Critical Discourse Analysis was used for the analysis of this thesis paper. Thus there was done the analysis of words, sentences, statements and paragraphs of the news articles of these media to identify what were the main discourses during the event. In addition, through the framing theory, there was defined the difference in coverage and frames, which were used to portray the July events. The findings showed that these three types of media published different news on the conflict. These “different publications” on the conflict carried various traits and reasons. In some, this depended on the location of the media, thus including the geographical location as well as in social position- either depended on state government or no. In some other, it depended on the lack or on the contrary overage of the information on the conflict. The author suggested a general critique of the news coverage on the July events by the three types of media and pointed out important discourses that were observed frequently in the news articles of those media.
Framing the Russia-Ukraine conflict in Chinese Global Television Network English
2024
This article examines the coverage of the conflict in Ukraine on the CGTN English website during the first three months. Through a quantitative content analysis of 1,799 news items, this research identifies the predominant frames, social actors, and sources of information employed in the media coverage. The results reveal that the “diplomatic frame” predominates, followed by the “war frame”. The “economic frame” gains more prominence over time, compared to the “human interest frame”. Over these months, CGTN moves from an impartial descriptive approach to one that attributes responsibility variously to both sides, while striving to maintain a neutral overall position.