The Inside Scoop: What Federal Judges Really Think about the Way Lawyers Write (original) (raw)
Related papers
Do as I Say, Not as I Do: A Report Card on Plain Language in the United States Supreme Court
2010
Style Matters: A Review Essay on Legal Writing
Yale Law Journal, 1982
Judicial Rhetoric & Lawyers' Roles
Notre Dame Law Review, 2015
1992
The Value of Legal Writing, Law Review, and Publication
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
Unsought Responsibility: The U.S. Supreme Court and the Politics of Passive Writing
Polity, 2013
Between Formalism and Discretion: Measuring Trends in Supreme Court Rhetoric
2019
Writing, Cognition, and the Nature of the Judicial Function
Supreme Court and the Politics of Passive Writing
The Supreme Court's Increased Attention to the Law of Lawyering: Mere Coincidence or Something More?
Am. UL Rev., 2010
Justices and Legal Clarity: Analyzing the Complexity of U.S. Supreme Court Opinions
Law & Society Review, 2011
Journal of Law and Courts, 2023
Judicial Rhetoric and Lawyers' Roles
Social Science Research Network, 2015
The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content
Social Science Research Network, 2013
The Long and the Short of It: The Influence of Briefs on Outcomes in the Roberts Court
Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 2017
Do Judges Follow the Law? An Empirical Test of Congressional Control Over Judicial Behavior
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
The Value of Precedent: Appellate Briefs and Judicial Opinions in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
Justice System Journal, 2013
Fiction and the Languages of Law Understanding Contemporary Legal Discourse ( PDFDrive )
Supreme Court Litigants and Strategic Framing
American Journal of Political Science, 2010
The Yale Law Journal, 1998
Do Lawyers Really Believe Their Own Hype and Should They?: A Natural Experiment
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
The Second Draft: Bulletin of the Legal Writing Institute
1994
2012
Effective Oral Argument: Six Pitches, Five Do's, and Five Don'ts from One Judge and Two Lawyers
Seattle Univ. …, 2010
Judicial Rhetoric & Lawyers\u27 Roles
2015
On getting inside the judge’s mind
Translational Issues in Psychological Science
Skewing the Results : The Role of Lawyers in Transmitting Legal Rules
2015
Charting the Influences on the Judicial Mind: An Empirical Study of Judicial Reasoning
New York University Law Review, 1998
The Influence of Unique Information in Briefs on Supreme Court Opinion Content
Justice System Journal, 2019
Statutory Interpretation on the Bench: A Survey of Forty-Two Judges on the Federal Courts of Appeals
SSRN Electronic Journal
The New Oral Argument: Justices as Advocates
2018
How to Write, Edit, and Review Persuasive Briefs: Seven Guidelines from One Judge and Two Lawyers
Seattle University Law Review, 2008
Questions from the Bench and Independent Experts: A Study of the Practices of State Court Judges
University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 2012
Rhetorical criticism of Supreme Court opinions : the opinions in Beal v. Doe
1985