Corneal aberration changes after rigid gas permeable contact lens wear in keratokonic patients (original) (raw)

Corneal aberration changes after rigid gas permeable contact lens wear

Mehdi Khabazkhoob

Journal of Current Ophthalmology, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Short-term corneal changes with gas-permeable contact lens wear in keratoconus subjects: A comparison of two fitting approaches

cnoo cnoo

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of ocular aberrations in three types of rigid gas permeable lenses in keratoconus patients

ebrahim jafarzadehpur

romanian journal of ophthalmology, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

Profile and Performance of Rigid Gas Permeable and Scleral Lenses on Keratoconic Patients in the Developing Contact Lens Practice Settings

Harun Chemjor

Open Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

Rigid gas permeable contact lens and corneal topography

E. Yebra-pimentel

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Visual performance and aberration associated with contact lens wear in keratoconus patients: a pilot study

Bariah Mohd Ali, Mustafa Abdu

View PDFchevron_right

Efficacy and Safety Comparison among Rigid Gas Permeable Contact Lens Correction for Keratoconus

Tri Rahayu

2016

View PDFchevron_right

Effect of Higher-Order Aberrations on Visual Function in Keratoconic Eyes with a Rigid Gas Permeable Contact Lens

Kazuno Negishi

American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Corrected visual functions in keratoconus patients with rigid gas permeable contact lens and its association with cone location

Mustafa Abdu, Mustafa Ali, Norhani Mohidin

View PDFchevron_right

Visual performance and aberration associated with contact lens wear in patients with keratoconus: a pilot study

Bariah Mohd. Ali

Clinical Optometry, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Effect of spherical rigid gas permeable lens on correction of corneal astigmatism

Usman Memon

International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health

View PDFchevron_right

Optical quality for keratoconic eyes with conventional RGP lens and simulated, customised contact lens corrections: a comparison

Hema Radhakrishnan

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of Rigid Gas-permeable Contact Lenses with Soft Hydrogel Contact Lens in Keratoconus and Their Impact on Quality of Life

Anchal Thakur

International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Cone location and correction of keratoconus with rigid gas-permeable contact lenses

mohammad khalili

Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

A randomised control trial of corneal vs. scleral rigid gas permeable contact lenses for ectatic corneal disorders

Alex Levit

2019

View PDFchevron_right

Hybrid Versus Rigid Gas Permeable Lens In Keratoconus: Objective and Subjective Evaluation

waleed abou samra

View PDFchevron_right

Visual Performance and Optical Quality of Standardized Asymmetric Soft Contact Lenses in Patients With Keratoconus

Asaki Suzaki

Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Visual performance and aberration associated with contact lens wear in patients with keratoconus

Mustafa Abdu, Bariah Mohd Ali

View PDFchevron_right

Patient-related barriers to Rigid Gas Permeable (RGP) lens wear among keratoconus patients in Jordan

Mera Haddad

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Contact Lenses for Keratoconus- Current Practice

Miltos Balidis

The open ophthalmology journal, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Case series: Extended wear of rigid gas permeable scleral contact lenses for the treatment of persistent corneal epithelial defects

Shikha Yadav

Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Effects of contact lens wearing on keratoconus: a confocal microscopy observation

Haliza Abdul Mutalib

International journal of ophthalmology, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

A Prospective Clinical Evaluation of a New Scleral Contact Lens for Patients with Distorted Corneas

Steven Jackson

View PDFchevron_right

Effect of the Rigid Gas-Permeable Contact Lens Use on the Endothelial Cells in Patients With Keratoconus

Samira Hagverdiyeva

Eye & contact lens, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

The Effects of Soft Contact Lens Wear on Corneal Thickness, Curvature, and Surface Regularity

Prakash Adhikari

Journal of Chitwan Medical College, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

The effects of rigid-gas-permeable contact lens wear on tear film of eyes with keratoconus

Mustafa Abdu

View PDFchevron_right

Variations in Central Corneal Thickness During the First Year of Contact Lens Wear

prashant bhushan

Acta Ophthalmologica, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

The Berkeley Contact Lens Extended Wear Study: part I

Nancy McNamara

Ophthalmology, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Ocular Discomfort at the Initial Wearing of Rigid Gas Permeable Contact Lenses

Hiroki Fujita

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Quality of Vision with Spectacles, Special Silicone Hydrogel and Gas Permeable Contact Lenses in Keratoconic Patients

Jorge Jorge

International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Predicting time to refractive stability after discontinuation of rigid contact lens wear before refractive surgery

Ayman Naseri

American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Contact Lenses as the Best Conservative Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Keratoconus – Epidemiological Retrospective Study

Igor Petricek

Collegium Antropologicum, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

A Comparison of Synergeyes Versus Traditional Rigid Gas Permeable Lens Designs for Patients With Irregular Corneas

Amy Nau

Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of Corneal Endothelial Bleb Formation and Disappearance Processes Between Rigid Gas-Permeable and Soft Contact Lenses in Three Classes of Dk/L

Sachiko Mitsunaga

Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice, 2003

View PDFchevron_right