Humanistic psychology versus behaviorism and psychodynamic psychology (original) (raw)
Related papers
The History and Current Practice of Humanistic Theory in Psychology
Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow were two of the founders of the Humanistic movement in modern psychology. While the Humanistic approach has persisted since the 1950’s, its use in the United States has been seen by some as controversial. This paper explores the history of the Humanistic approach, briefly explores the contributions of its founders, and discusses how humanistic theory is currently being utilized in the practice of modern psychology.
Humanistic Elements in Buddhist Psychology
Humanistic psychology is a psychological perspective that rose to prominence in the mid-20 th century in answer to the limitations of Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory and B.
The Humanistic Perspective in Psychology - Historical Overview
V. Zeigler-Hill & T.K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
The humanistic perspective on personality emphasizes the individualized qualities of optimal well-being and the use of creative potential to benefit others, as well as the relational conditions that promote those qualities as the outcomes of healthy development. The humanistic perspective serves as an alternative to mechanistic and/or reductionistic explanations of personality based on isolated, static elements of observable behavior (e.g., traits) or self-concept.
The Humanistic Revolution in Psychology: Its Inaugural Vision
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 2020
This article presents a textual analysis of the inaugural issue of the Journal of Humanistic Psychology. The analysis culminated in the creation of a composite narrative that expresses the character of the humanistic vision for psychological science, a historical snapshot of the evolving humanistic revolution circa 1961. The analysis showed humanistic psychology to have proposed a nonreactionary, inclusive, integrative approach to psychology. This approach was anchored in a radicalized image of humanity, one that would not rely wholly on theories and methods of research designed for nonhuman beings. The findings further indicate that, from its inception, humanistic psychology was envisioned to be a unique amalgam of what would today be considered cultural psychology, cognitive psychology, and developmental psychology, without being reducible to any one of these subfields. It was and remains an effort in earnest to do justice to a truer self, engaged in the process of becoming, operating within biological and cultural parameters.
Self-actualization is a need for people to be able to do things the best that he could. The term self-actualization are used in a wide range of psychological theories such as the theory of Kurt Goldstein, Abraham Maslow (1962) and Carl Rogers (1961). Kurt Goldstein is an expert seoarang the first to see that a man needs is the primary motivation for Manusa, while other needs are needs manifestation. Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs provides an explanation of that as the highest level of psychological development can be achieved when all the basic needs have been met and self-actualization can do. Meanwhile, according to Carl Rogers, self-actualization is a process in humans to be themselves and develop properties that are owned and unique psychological potential.
Humanistic Psychology and the Qualitative Research Tr adition
O NE OF THE MOST exciting and promising developments in psy chology during the latter part of the 20th century was the proliferation of diverse research methods and the articula tion of their scientific and philosophical soundness within a sophisticated methodol ogy that can be called humanistic. This chapter, after spelling out the natural sci ence context in which psychology has devel oped its disciplinary identity, considers the criteria by which a research method or methodology may be considered humanis tic. Next, it takes a sample from the rich tra dition of humanistic research in the history of psychology. Then, the chapter focuses on the recent developments in the philosophy of science and psychology itself that have opened the way for the contemporary blos soming of humanistic research methods. Finally, the challenges and contemporary possibilities of employing humanistic research methods are articulated. PSYCHOLOGY AS A NATURAL SCIENCE No trend in modern psychology has been more conspicuous or more pervasive than the attempt to make psychology a natural science. With this has come the often wit ting, and sometimes subtle and unwitting, reduction of the human to the nonhuman. This trend is evident in behaviorism, which attempted to define the subject matter of psychology in terms of physical observables and to explain human behavior using the same principles developed in research on nonhuman animals. This trend is evident in many theoretical orientations such as con temporary evolutionary psychology, which explains human behavior by means of evo lutionary biology. In virtually every intro ductory psychology textbook is a chapter on the biological foundations of psychology in which human behavior is explained by neurophysiology. 231
The History and Future of Humanistic Psychology
Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 2011
Since much of humanistic psychology's agenda has been taken up by mainstream psychology and culture, the question of whether humanistic psychology is relevant today is critical. This article draws on Maslow's description of "sickness of the soul" to argue that a psychology that stresses connection and embodied experience, meaning and ethics, creativity and dreams, resilience and self-actualization is needed now more than ever.
A Critical Comparison of the Psychoanalytic and Humanistic Theory
The Psychoanalytic Theory and the Humanistic Theory: A Critical Comparison Personality psychology is typically a prime focus of many psychology theories. Some of the more renowned theories include the traits theory, the biopsychological theory, the social learning theory, the humanistic theory, the behavioural theory and the psychoanalytic theory. In this paper, a comparison of the two most contradictory theories of personality psychology is madethe Psychoanalytic and the Humanistic theories.