Measuring the persuasive power of consumerist activism: An experimental study on the Polity model applied to food imitating products (original) (raw)

Deconstructing corporate activism: a consumer approach

Journal of Management & Organization, 2022

Defending social and political positions other than those that a company's clients might support has always been an avoidable risk. However, this practice, called 'corporate activism,' has gradually been integrated into the strategies of organizations. The object of this work is thus to understand the antecedents of corporate activism from the consumer's point of view. To understand this, we carry out structural equation modeling (SEM) based on a sample of 1,521 consumers. The results demonstrate that: (i) institutional credibility, corporate credibility, and authenticity act as antecedents of corporate activism; (ii) corporate credibility has a positive influence on corporate activism, while institutional credibility has a negative impact. These findings represent an interesting and novel contribution that helps to understand how these types of high-risk strategies should be adopted. The application of these results could enable companies to determine the conditions that favor a positive evaluation of corporative activism by consumers and avoid the use of such strategies in less favorable situations.

The role of consumer speech acts in brand activism: A transformative advertising perspective

Journal of Advertising , 2024

Transformative advertising research (TAR) suggests examining advertising's transformational possibilities via the interactions between institutional actors at each marketing level to gauge its effect on society. We employ rhetorical institutionalizm as a lens to examine the online speech acts of consumers as they respond to a brand activism campaign focusing on an environmental problem. Our data takes the form of written comments by YouTube users and employs a research design using automated text analysis and qualitative thematic data analysis. Our contributions to TAR are threefold. First, we offer a preliminary conceptualization of the role of consumer language as rhetorical institutional work to advance TAR scholars and practitioners' insight. Second, we highlight the role of linguistic tone and clout in giving speakers agency through which consumers as institutional actors create, maintain and disrupt institutional logics and practices. Finally, we develop a tripartite classification of consumer speech acts used to support brand activism. We label these Activist Warriors, Brand Champions and Conscious Consumers as typologies that deepen understanding of how consumers' online speech may amplify brand activism, thereby contributing to advertising's transformative outcomes. We conclude by outlining important managerial implications including how practitioners can adopt the tripartite classification to enhance brand activism campaigns.

Rhetorical strategies of consumer activists: reframing market offers to promote change.

Consumer research has most frequently looked at the influence the marketplace has on consumers’ identity projects, while the reverse process – how consumers’ identity projects influence the marketplace and general culture – is an important issue that has received less attention. Aiming to contribute to the development of this literature, we conduct a qualitative netnographic investigation of the Fat Acceptance Movement, an online-based movement led by consumer-activists who attempt to change societal attitudes about people who are fat. Our main goal is, therefore, to investigate how consumer activists who congregate online, that is, cyberactivists, reframe market offers while attempting to promote market and cultural change. We identify several rhetorical strategies employed by online consumer activists in their quests to change themselves, other consumers, and the broader culture. Our findings advance consumer research on how consumers may mobilize resources to initiate and promote self-, market-, and cultural transformations.

Consumer Boycotts as Instruments for Structural Change

Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2018

Consumer boycotts have become a frequent form of social protest in the digital age. The corporate malpractices motivating them are varied, including environmental pollution, lack of minimum labour standards, severe mistreatment of animals, lobbying and misinformation campaigns, collaboration or complicity with illegitimate political regimes, and systematic tax evasion and tax fraud. In this article, I argue that organised consumer boycotts should be regarded as a legitimate and purposeful instrument for structural change, provided they conform to a number of normative criteria. In order to show this, the practice and empirical context of consumer boycotts are first outlined. I then lay out and refute three general objections to this practice. Although each of these objections fails, their discussion generates insights concerning the normative standards with which boycotters must comply if they want their campaigns to be both legitimate and successful. These normative criteria are detailed along the lines of two guiding principles, proportionality and transparency. In the final step, I elaborate on structural change as the deeper purpose of consumer boycotts.

When activism may prove counterproductive: An exploratory study of anti-brand spoof advertising effects in the tobacco industry

2010

First stage of research on the effects of anti-tobacco brand spoof ads on the consumer, this paper proposes an exploratory study of netnographic inspiration of the comments left on YouTube by individuals freshly exposed to anti-tobacco brand spoof ads. The results show that anti-tobacco brand spoof ads generate more positive emotions than negative emotions, particularly among non-smokers, and that individuals respond according to the source to which they attribute the ads (i.e., an activist, the tobacco industry or the government). The discussion of the results led to anticipate that anti-tobacco brand spoof ads could prove counterproductive...

Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology

Journal of Consumer Research, 2004

This article focuses on consumer movements that seek ideological and cultural change. Building from a basis in New Social Movement (NSM) theory, we study these movements among anti-advertising, anti-Nike, and anti-GE food activists. We find activists' collective identity linked to an evangelical identity related to U.S. activism's religious roots. Our findings elucidate the value of spiritual and religious identities to gaining commitment, warn of the perils of preaching to the unconverted, and highlight movements that seek to transform the ideology and culture of consumerism. Conceiving mainstream consumers as ideological opponents inverts conventional NSM theories that view them as activists' clients.

A signaling theory of consumer boycotts

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2012

We present a theory that explains the prevalence of consumer boycotts. In our model, a firm does not know how concerned consumers are about the firm's misconduct. Because it is only optimal for the firm to alter its behavior if consumers are very concerned, consumers have an incentive to overstate their concern by boycotting the firm. We show that free-riding problems do not preclude such boycotting. In fact, in each equilibrium boycotting occurs with positive probability and the firm always caters to the demands of those who boycott should boycotting ensue. (P. Heijnen), a.van.der.made@rug.nl (A. van der Made). 1 There are various reasons for a consumer to boycott. Consumers can object to the conditions under which a product is made (Nike using child labor), to the materials used in the product (Armani using fur), or the impact of the production process on the environment (McDonald's using Brazilian beef from cattle whose grazing grounds are cleared Amazonian rain forests), to name a few.

Vanishing Boycott Impetus: Why and How Consumer Participation in a Boycott Decreases Over Time

Journal of Business Ethics

Media reports that a company behaves in a socially nonresponsible manner frequently result in consumer participation in a boycott. As time goes by, however, the number of consumers participating in the boycott starts dwindling. Yet, little is known on why individual participation in a boycott declines and what type of consumer is more likely to stop boycotting earlier rather than later. Integrating research on drivers of individual boycott participation with multi-stage models and the hot/cool cognition system, suggests a “heat-up” phase in which boycott participation is fueled by expressive drivers, and a “cool-down” phase in which instrumental drivers become more influential. Using a diverse set of real contexts, four empirical studies provide evidence supporting a set of hypotheses on promotors and inhibitors of boycott participation over time. Study 1 provides initial evidence for the influence of expressive and instrumental drivers in a food services context. Extending the cont...

Exploring why consumers engage in boycotts: toward a unified model

It has become commonplace for consumers to judge companies against social responsibility criteria. Along with such judgments, many consumers are also taking up action, often using the Internet to virally spread their views. Such consumer-led campaigns can put at risk years of investments in branding. For firms understanding what drives consumers to engage in boycotts is key to minimizing exposure to such viral risk. To date, the academic literature has offered disparate and disconnected findings with respect to boycott participation. In this research paper, we review relevant literature, confirm its appropriateness using a series of in-depth interviews, and use our findings to identify key antecedents to consumer participation in boycotts. We then test our proposed model through an empirical study, thus revealing key drivers of consumers' intention to participate in such boycotts. Our results offer insight into factors that companies can manage so as to prevent consumers from participating in boycotts.

Strategic Interactions in Consumer Politics: Lessons from the Sociology of Social Movements

Journal for the Association of Consumer Research, 2024

Recent trends in the sociology of social movements have highlighted how strategic players engage one another in structured but open-ended arenas, as well as switching among arenas. Players can include individuals as well as intentional groupings of individuals such as formal organizations, informal groups, alliances, and sometimes vaguer (less unified) teams such as social movements or states. Arenas also range from informal meetings to highly rule-bound and ritualized settings, but always with outcomes and decisions at stake. Consumer politics often combines individual and team players, and a strategic-interactionist framework can see how these fit together. For example in the common case of boycotts, it turns out that the compound players tend to have more of an ef-fect than individual consumer choices. In its attention to players, the new perspective emphasizes cultural meanings, the points of view of players, their emotions, and their strategic dilemmas and decisionmaking.