V. Pricopie (2014). „Debating Europe in Romanian Parliament”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 149: pp. 772 – 777 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Transylvanian review of administrative sciences, 2015
This paper aims to shed light on the role of elites in the Europeanization of the national public sphere. 15 semi-structured in-depth interviews with representatives of political, administrative, and media elites in Romania were carried out between March 23 and April 24, 2014, which was on the eve of the 2014 European Elections campaign. Our research shows that, in general, the Romanian elites – be them political, administrative, or media-related – declare themselves as euro-enthusiasts or euro-realists; at the same time, through a diversity of blame-avoiding games, they use the EU as a means of diffusing (national) responsibility for crisis-related hot topics, such as the implementation of austerity measures. By identifying the key narratives of Europeanization in elites’ discourse on the 2014 European Elections, this paper indicates that we witness a paradoxical trend, in which elites are rather challengers than advocates of Europeanization.
in HARMSEN, Robert, SCHILD, Joachim (eds.), Debating Europe: The European Parliament Elections 2009 and Beyond, 2011
Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 2022
Over the past decade, the wave of successive crises that hit the EU has tested the EU’s legitimacy and resulted in increased EU politicisation. In the period between the Brexit referendum up until the 2019 European elections, several CEE member states (such as Poland and Hungary and to a lesser extent Romania) contested the EU for breaching their national sovereignty, claiming that their countries’ values and identities are ‘threatened’ by the EU’s interference. In this article, we analyse the case of Romania’s clashes with the European Commission between 2017 and 2019 on the topic of rule of law backsliding. We analyse these discursive clashes in connection to the country’s first Presidency of the Council, as an illustration of the increased politicisation placed in the overall context of the Future of Europe debates. The empirical part is based on a chronological account of selected qualitative data about how this national-supranational ‘power struggle’ unfolded in the studied period. The findings show that in the case of Romania two forms of politicisation coincided and collided - one that was ‘bottom-up’, marked by highly polarised national politics and an East–West division and another that was ‘top-down’ - defined by the tensions inside EU’s own political dynamics between the Council and the Commission.
National or European? The Case of Romanian Political Parties' Platforms for 2009 European Elections
2009
This article addresses the issue of the relationship between national and European dimensions, as overlapping identity structures of Romanian citizenship in the last years. The problem of a European identity became prominent in the context of the recent integration of Romania into the European structures. This paper presents a textual analysis of political platforms concerning European and national identities, as presented on the official sites of Romanian political parties during the 2009 European elections campaign.
The Language of Romanian Politics: Reifying the Other
Messages, Sages and Ages, 2016
The dominant ideology of a society seems to possess the means to infiltrate an individual's conscience with relative ease. From the perspective of the functions of language, we intend to investigate those fundamental characteristics of the ideological discourse that reify the left-right dichotomy in Romanian politics.
This chapter aims at providing support for those who want to undertake discourse analysis in relationship with European integration. First, the main fields of literature dealing with various kinds of European discourses are reviewed: the EU as a polity and a global actor, the constitution of an EU public sphere, and the role of discourse in the Europeanization of policy making. In order to help scholars to choose one appropriate approach to their topic, four main approaches to be found in the literature -content analysis, framing, narratives and critical discourse analysis -and then outlined. This includes an explanation of the methods used in relation with different theoretical underpinnings. Furthermore, the chapter aims at helping students of European discourses to deal with some of the challenges they may face with regard to the corpus, the analytical framework, coding or interpretation. For doing so, it consistently provides advice on the basis of one concrete illustrative piece of research.
This article contributes to the theoretical and methodological discussion on textual-contextual analysis in political communication and media research. It argues that taking into consideration both text and context throughout an analysis of the process of production enables the observation of the relation between the social and the linguistic. It opens up a non-deterministic perspective for the analysis of the above relation. The article rests upon an empirical study on the production of discourses for the campaign of European Parliament elections. The use of such a multilevel approach adds important elements to the research findings, particularly in terms of showing on the one hand how power relations within ‘Europarties’ results in the construction of common European identities in different European Union (EU) states, and on the other hand how professionalization of political communication reinforces discursive dissimilarities between parties of the same ideological family in different EU states.
Metaphor and Intercultural Communication
In this paper we focus on one particular way Serbia"s EU accession is conceptualised in Serbian and EU discourse, that by the JOURNEY metaphor scenario, particularly dealing with two specific expressions, step and traffic light, as used by Serbian and EU politicians. The comparison of the two data collections (national and institutional) shows that while these two groups use identical expressions, the discourses in which these expressions are used seem to be slanted so as to fit the respective communicative and political purposes of the discourse communities. This in turn means that, despite the intercultural character of the step and traffic light metaphors, these same metaphors are used for utterly different "argumentative and ideological purposes" , which in case of Serbian discourse frequently results in misunderstanding by Serbian citizens, the fuelling of Euroscepticism and a negative sentiment towards the EU, at times backfiring on the original intentions of the metaphor users.