Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Fluorescence in Aesthetic Direct Restorations (original) (raw)
Related papers
A new methodology for fluorescence analysis of composite resins used in anterior direct restorations
General dentistry
The aim of this study was to use a new methodology to evaluate the fluorescence of composite resins for direct restorations. Microhybrid (group 1, Amelogen; group 2, Opallis; group 3, Filtek Z250) and nanohybrid (group 4, Filtek Z350 XT; group 5, Brilliant NG; group 6, Evolu-X) composite resins were analyzed in this study. A prefabricated matrix was used to prepare 60 specimens of 7.0 × 3.0 mm (n = 10 per group); the composite resin discs were prepared in 2 increments (1.5 mm each) and photocured for 20 seconds. To establish a control group of natural teeth, 10 maxillary central incisor crowns were horizontally sectioned to create 10 discs of dentin and enamel tissues with the same dimensions as the composite resin specimens. The specimens were placed in a box with ultraviolet light, and photographs were taken. Aperture 3.0 software was used to quantify the central portion of the image of each specimen in shades of red (R), green (G), and blue (B) of the RGB color space. The brighte...
Evaluation of the Fluorescence of Composite Resins Under an Ultraviolet Light Source
International journal of odontostomatology, 2018
The aim of this research is to compare the fluorescence of different trademarks of composite resins under ultraviolet light, indicating through the optical characteristics the restorative materials that best mimic the properties of dental fluorescence. In this study, nine composite resin trademarks of EA2 color were evaluated, and ten test samples were prepared for each material, totalizing ninety specimens. The specimens were produced from a bipartite aluminium matrix (10x2 mm), and then stored for 24 h in tubes of radiographic films, immersed in distilled water and after 48 h it were polished. A blind-type study (four evaluators) was used and the samples were analyzed in a dark wooden chamber where it was coupled two black lamps. In the data collection phase, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, ANOVA and Post Hoc of Tukey were used (adopting a significance level of 0.05). It was noted that the composite resin of the trademark Ultrafill was more fluorescent and Luna was statistically less fluorescent than all other materials, while Opallis and Tetric were superior to Glacier. There was no significant statistical difference among the composite resins Premissa, Point 4, Llis and Premium.
In vitro evaluation of composite resin fluorescence after natural aging
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2020
Background: Some composite resins contain luminophorous agents in order to reproduce tooth fluorescence. The objective of this study was to compare the fluorescence spectra emitted by composite resins with those of human enamel and dentin, and their emission behaviour after a 90-day natural aging period. Material and Methods: Nine shades of the composite resins Z350XT/3M (XT), Opallis/FGM (OP) and Empress Direct/Ivoclar-Vivadent (ED) were analyzed. Five specimens (10.0 mm x 2.0mm) were fabricated for each shade. Enamel (5.0 mm x 0.30 mm) and dentin (5.0 mm x 1.0 mm) specimens were obtained from sound human third molars. Fluorescence spectra of human dentin and enamel as well as the composite specimens immediately after fabrication were measured at the excitation peaks of 375, 395 and 410 nm. To assess composite resin fluorescence intensity changes over time, measurements were conducted after 30, 60 and 90 days, at 395 nm. Differences in fluorescence intensity over time were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Results: Fluorescence spectra baseline values of composites demonstrated no differences in intensity among the excitation peaks tested, with maximum emission found at the peak of 450 nm. Enamel and dentin spectra varied with different excitations, and the greater the excitation, the longer the wavelength in comparison to composite resins. After 90 days, XT presented an increase in fluorescence intensity, while OP and ED showed a reduction when compared with baseline values. Conclusions: Fluorescence intensity of composite resins changed during the period analyzed, with an emission behavior different from that of human enamel and dentin. The main changes occurred in the first 30 days.
Effect of thickness on fluorescence of resin-composites and dental substrates
Brazilian Dental Science, 2016
Objective: This study evaluated the effect of thickness on fluorescence of resin composites and tooth substrates (enamel and dentin). Material and methods: Ninety bovine incisors were used, resulting in 45 dentin and 45 enamel disks (6 mm diameter and 0.5, 1, or 1.5 mm in thickness). Ninety discs of Charisma, Filtek Z350 and IPS Empress Direct (for enamel and dentin) resins at same dimensions were built. Fluorescence measurements were performed using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (RF-5301PC, Shimadzu Corp) with excitation at 365 nm. Data were submitted to 2-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests (? = 0.05). Results: The 2- way - ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences for all factors, as well as the interaction between them (p <0.05). Dentin specimens (1.5 mm) showed highest fluorescence (128.33 A.U.), while Filtek Z350 (dentin - 1.0 mm) showed the lowest fluorescence (29.84 A.U.). Thickness influenced fluorescence values of enamel substrate. Conclusion: The thickne...
Operative Dentistry, 2014
SUMMARY The aim of this study was to evaluate the fluorescence intensity of different composite resins and compare those values with the fluorescence intensity of dental tissues. Different composite resins were used to make 10 discs (2 mm in depth and 4 mm in diameter) of each brand, divided into groups: 1) Z (Filtek Z350, 3M ESPE), 2) ES (Esthet-X, Dentsply), 3) A (Amelogen Plus, Ultradent), 4) DVS (Durafill-VS, Heraeus Kulzer) with 2 mm composite resin for enamel (A2), 5) OES ([Esthet-X] opaque-OA [1 mm] + enamel-A2 [1 mm]); 6) ODVSI ([Charisma-Opal/Durafill-VSI], opaque-OM (1 mm) + translucent [1mm]), and 7) DVSI ([Durafill- VSI] translucent [2 mm]). Dental tissue specimens were obtained from human anterior teeth cut in a mesiodistal direction to obtain enamel, dentin, and enamel/dentin samples (2 mm). The fluorescence intensity of specimens was directly measured using an optic fiber associated with a spectrometer (Ocean Optics USB 4000) and recorded in graphic form (Origin 8.0 p...
Curēus, 2024
Introduction: The recently developed single-shade composite resin (using the concept of structural coloring) is a promising option to eliminate the process and subjectivity of shade selection. However, current evidence of its performance is still insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the color matching, color stability, and refractive index (RI) of single-shade restorations compared with conventional composite resin. Methods: This in vitro study was conducted on 48 extracted maxillary premolars. The teeth were sorted into three tooth shade groups (B2, A3, and A3.5). Each group included two subgroups based on the materials used: Omnichroma (OM; Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan) and Filtek Z350 (FT; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). Buccal and lingual Class V round cavities were prepared and restored according to the randomly assigned subgroups, with the test single-shade material (OM) on one surface and the matching conventional control material (FT) of the proper shade on the other surface of each tooth. Color matching was evaluated by visual assessment and a spectrophotometer. All specimens were distributed into four staining groups and immersed in various staining beverages (black coffee, Arabic coffee, Coca-Cola, and distilled water) for four weeks. Color changes were assessed using a spectrophotometer. Four groups of disc-shaped specimens (single-shade, B2, A3, and A3.5) were fabricated to evaluate the RI using a refractometer. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the materials. Results: The mean value of the color difference (ΔE) of single-shade restorations was significantly higher than that of paired conventional restorations in all shade groups. The highest mean ΔE was in subgroup A3.5-OM (8.84 ± 2.39) and showed significantly less color matching than other OM subgroups (p=0.009). The visual assessment showed comparable and acceptable color matching in all subgroups except A3.5-OM (p=0.006). There was a significant color change after the staining test within and across staining groups, but the color change was comparable between the OM and FT subgroups. The RI of single-shade material was significantly higher than conventional material (p<0.05). Conclusion: The color matching of single-shade restorations was affected by tooth shade. Its color stability was influenced by various staining substances but was similar to conventional restorations.