Decision-Making Styles and Personality Traits (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Role of Phenotypic Personality Traits as Dimensions of Decision-making Styles
The Open Psychology Journal, 2019
Each individual has unique personality traits which affect decision-making process. Those traits are defined as cautiousness, openness to experience, decision difficulty, agency, emotion neutrality, goal orientation, intuitive awareness, plan orientation, pro-activity, and rationality.The study aimed to show how established personality traits as dimensions of decision-making can be used to classify four distinct decision-making styles. The personality styles are defined as avoidant, designer, flexible, and auditor styles.A global survey was conducted to gather information on individual decision-making styles. Quantitative methods, such as tabular analysis, mean score equivalency test, correlation analysis, discriminant analysis and chi-square test for association have been used.We found that there are significant gender differences in personality styles. This is partially due to the differences in emotion-neutrality scores among men and women. Female respondents are more emotional, ...
Personality Types as Predictors of Decision Making Styles
Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 2012
Dispositional factors play a vital role in decision making styles. Some personality theorists considered decision making as an integral part of the personality. The famous personality psychologist Carl Jung is one of the early scholars whose theory on psychological types provided precious basis for scientific work on decision making styles. Jung (1976) claimed that humans problem solving is based on four functions including sensing, thinking, feeling, and intuition. Keegan (1984) introduced Jung's (1976) typology into management, pioneering psychological contribution to decision making. Similarly, McCrae and Costa (1990) while proposing the big five personality types, considered decision making ability as an integral part of the various personality dimensions.A good deal of research is evident on the role of various personality dimensions in decision making styles. The well-researched dimensions include innovativeness, self-esteem, locus of control, and social desirability (Scot...
INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN DECISION-MAKING STYLES AS PREDICTORS OF GOOD DECISION MAKING
Few studies have examined the relations between decision-making styles and decision-making quality. This study takes one approach to investigating these relations by exploring the usefulness of decision-making styles as predictors of peer-rated good decision making. Five decision-making styles were examined as predictors of dimensions of decision-making quality, which included reason-based, values-based, and creative decision making (Dane & Pratt, 2009), as well as general decision-making quality. Results demonstrated that self-reported rational decisionmaking style was positively related to peer-rated decision-making quality. Additionally, self-reported avoidant and spontaneous decision-making styles were negatively related to peer-rated decision-making quality. The results also suggest that decision-making styles may be able to predict variance in decision-making quality above that accounted for by the Big Five traits. Thus, these findings suggest that decision-making styles appear to be valuable for predicting decision-making quality. In particular, a rational, logical decisionmaking process appears to result in positive outcomes, whereas avoiding making decisions and making spontaneous decisions has negative outcomes. iv This thesis is dedicated to my parents who have always supported me in my academic endeavors. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my thesis chair, Scott Highhouse, for his support, guidance, and helpful feedback. I would also like to thank my committee members, Maggie Brooks and Yiwei Chen, for their suggestions and feedback.
Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health
This study investigates the psychometric characteristics of the General Decision-Making Scale (GDMS) on a sample of Slovak high-school and university students. Secondly, it addresses the relationship between decision-making styles and a) decision making competencies and b) mental health as validity criteria. Participants were 427 Slovak high school and university students (64.6% females). The GDMS showed a good internal consistency and its original factor structure was confirmed. Low but significant relationships between the decision-making styles were found. Two decision-making styles served as significant predictors of the general decision-making competency (avoidant and spontaneous) and another two were found to predict mental health. The intuitive decision-making style was a protective factor and the avoidant style was a risk factor.
Frontiers in Psychology, 2021
This study explores the relationship between decision-making style, as measured by the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire, and personality based on alternative five-factor model along with effect of age, sex and social position on such styles. A large sample of community and undergraduate students (n= 1,562; Mage= 40.03,SD= 18.43) was analyzed. The results showed that Neuroticism and Extraversion were significantly related to the non-vigilant styles Hypervigilance, Buck-passing and Procrastination. Women scored significantly lower in Vigilance and higher in Hypervigilance, Buck-passing and Procrastinations than men. Age was significantly related to decision-making style in a U-shaped fashion. The Social Position Index was significantly related to all decision-making styles. The most predictive personality domains regarding decision-making scales were Aggressiveness (negatively) and Activity for Vigilance, and Neuroticism for Hypervigilance, Buck-passing and Procrastination. Age...
Decision-making style: habit, style or both?
The purpose of this study was to explore the relations between individual decision-making styles as measured by the General Decision-making Style (GDMS) test, developed by , and some mental abilities theoretically related to decision-making. Participants were 206 Swedish military officers from all services. The multiple regression analysis showed that the Rational, Dependent and Avoidant, but not the Intuitive and Spontaneous decision-making styles could be partly predicted from scores on the Self-esteem Scales and from scores on the Action Control Scales . The result indicates that decision-making style is not only reflective of habits and thinking practices as proposed in earlier research. Decision-making style also involves basic self-evaluation and the general ability to initiate and maintain intentions (i.e. self-regulation). This calls for a wider definition of the term decision-making style, a holistic definition that takes the whole individual into consideration. #
MANAGERS' PERSONALITY TRAITS OVER MANAGEMENT STYLES AND DECISION-MAKING STYLES
The paper seeks to offer a contribution to the extent literature on the role of managers' personality characteristics over management styles and decision-making styles. We have prepared a questionnaire which consists of Girgin's (2007) personality scale adaptation from Goldberg (1992), Kurban's (2015) decision-making scale adopted from Scott and Bruce (1995), and Yıldızhan's (2012) management style scale. The questionnaire is conducted among managers and employees in various sectors in Istanbul via the single random sampling method. Frequency analysis is applied to descriptive findings. In order to determine reliability and validity of the scales, reliability and factor analysis are performed. We have focused on investigating the impact of managers' personality traits on management styles and decision-making styles by applying the Multivariate Regression Model and Correlation Analysis. The result of the factor analysis revealed that the three dimensions (extraversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness) of big-five personality traits have a significant effect on some dimensions of managers' decision making and management styles.
Personality Influences Decision-Making Ability of Managers
Personality is defined as the characteristic set of behaviors, cognitions, and emotional patterns that evolve from biological and environmental factors. Personality has three ego states that can be confirmed by observable behavior: the parent, adult, or child. Every manager makes decisions based on the predominant ego state of his/her personality. To keep pace with changing environment, the entire process of decision making is got to be accelerated and toned up to cope with new challenges and added dimensions to problems. New elements are to be introduced for forcing the managers to become more capable and confident in dealing with complex and diverse situations. Moreover, not much work has been done in this area. Though, this field may not be totally unexplored, yet due to rapidly changing environment, growing competition, changing consumer demands, expectations, growing consumer awareness and expanding markets, the significance of decision making is ever increasing. The impact of a small decision is many times phenomenal on the organization; therefore, the subject has been selected for the research. It is noteworthy that, work done in this area totals up to 3% of total studies done and much more work is required to be done in this area. The aim of the study is to establish relationship between quality decision and its dimension personality. The purpose of the study is to reveal how decision making is a tough job for managers to decide upon accurately and precisely on each and every problem faced by them, because the survival of organization largely depends upon their capabilities and talent for making qualitative decisions, which are influenced by Personality of Manager making the Decision.
An Investigation of the Relationship between MBTI Personality Types and Decision-Making Competence
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) belongs to the most widely used personality measures, but its associations with decision-making were rarely explicitly studied. Relationships between MBTI personality types and decision-making competencies were the object of interest in present study. 121 high school (age 15-16) and university students (age 19-25) completed MBTI test and Adult Decision-Making Competence to assess their personality and decision-making competence. Correlation analysis and analysis of variance were used to investigate the relationship between personality and decision-making competence. Correlation analysis revealed that only five of 48 relationships between eight personality dimensions on the one hand and six decision-making competencies on the other hand were significant. Similar results were found by the relationship between decision-making competencies and new variables created as the differences between two opposite dimensions. No differences in decision-making competencies were significant by the comparison of four basic MBTI types. MBTI personality types do not associate with decision-making styles. This result points out that good decision-making outcomes are not exclusive for certain personalities and can be achieved by various ways.
Studia Psychologica, 2014
The study is focused on the question how the need for structure and the Big Five personality traits predict decision making styles in health professionals. The sample included 225 health care professionals from different areas (physicians, nurses, paramedics, emergency link operators). Need for structure was measured by Personal Need for Structure scale, Big Five Traits by Ten Item Personality Inventory, and the decision making styles by Melbou rne Decision Making Questionnaire. The results showed that the best predictor of vigilance was need for structure, while extroversion was a negative predictor of non-vigilant styles. Analysis of interaction showed that neuroticism interacts with need for structure in prediction of non-vigilant decision making styles (hypervigilance, procrastination and buck-passing). Specifically, persons with low neuroticism and low need for structure tend to use more non-vigilant decision making styles in comparison to others.