The President as the Subject of Constitutional Responsibility in the Albanian Regulations (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Functional Analysis of the Presidential Institution in Albania
The Constitution of the Republic of Albania lays down the functional duties of the President of the Republic. Although the functions may have changed along the years, the President of the Republic has many important duties for the smooth operation of things in the country. Obviously, the President's Office is entrusted an unusual burdern that often puts it in a tight spot:on one side, quality of any decision issued is expected, but, on the other, the staff is quite limitted. These circumstances give particular importance to enhancing the efficiency of staff in this institution by optimising its organisational setup ; but, the approach imposed by the constitutional functions make it impossible for the President's advisors to deliver the proper quality. On the contrary, all main and auxiliary functions need to be fulfilled by separate institutional units under the Secretary-General. Besides, the Assembly must immediately adopt an organic Law for the President, clearly stipulating how the President's Office must act in line with each constitutional function. Such law would consolidate the President's Office position against any spontanous reaction and would avert any controversies on how it acts, as it would legaly align procedures to actions.
The independence of the state and the integrity of its territory, dignity of the individual, human rights and freedoms, social justice, constitutional order, pluralism, national identity and inheritance, religious coexistence, as well as coexistence with, and understanding of Albanians for, minorities are the bases of this state, which has the duty of respecting and protecting them.
Establishment in the Republic of Albania
2014
Administrative Adjudication is the guarantee of effective protection of subjective rights and legitimate interests of the people through a fair trial and within quick and reasonable terms. The establishment of Administrative Court in Albania was a necessity with the sole purpose of creating a more peaceful climate for the progress of the reports between Public Administration and Private Entities. The need for judicial control of the Administrative activity derives from the principle of the the Rule of Law, the latter led by the principle that the subjective rights of citizens should be protected, not only against other people, but also against the Public Administration. This paper addresses the necessity of establishing the Administrative Court and its role in the Republic of Albania, refered to the law for its creation. The activity of the Administrative Court, Administrative Law principles and innovations of this law are analysed here. An important part of this paper is the necess...
Constitutional responsibility of the President of Slovenia
2016
Constitutional responsibility of the President of Slovenia The subject matter of the article are issues related to the enforcement of constitutional responsibility of the President of Slovenia. In Poland, the body authorized to conduct proceedings on the constitutional responsibility of the President is a special court, namely the State Tribunal. The Slovenian legislator introduced a different model for the institution. The legislature chose the Constitutional Court as the body competent to conduct proceedings relating to the President's constitutional liability. Just like the Polish solutions concerning that institution, also Slovenian regulations have drawbacks. In my article, I try to depict the consecutive stages of the procedure concerning the constitutional responsibility of the President of Slovenia, the proceedings in the parliament and before the Constitutional Court. In the end, I present conclusions from the analysis of the collected material.
Some Reflections on the Constitutional Review in Albania in a Comparison Key
2021
In this study we will try to analyze the foundations of the Constitution as a pillar and as a guarantee for its solidity. The study will also address the need for revision of the constitution as a fundamental element of its existence and continuity. Particular emphasis will be given to the comparison of the constitutions of the most important countries in the world as regards the procedures and limits to the constitutional revision. In this sense, the constitutions of some Balkan Peninsula countries will be analyzed to draw a comparison and analyze the Albanian Constitution as regards the procedure for its revision. The study intends to analyze the procedures for the revision of the Constitution as well as the explicit and implicit limits to these revisions. In the Constitutional revision in Albania in 2016, the role of the Constitutional Court on the control of the constitutional legitimacy of constitutional revision laws was clarified. Formal constitutionality is usually emphasize...
The Necessity to Precise Defines the Albanian Administrative Courts' Competences
The establishment of Administrative Courts in Albania is an important step done in the justice system. Administrative Courts decisions have a direct influence in creating an appropriate climate between public administration and private entities and solving with efficiency the disputes between them. In practical terms, the law "On Administrative Courts" which is being implemented presents some problems regarding the competences. Due to the lack of transitional provisions in the law, that should define the competent court for the cases previously recorded, there are some disagreements regarding the files which were being analyzing in the Court of First Instance. The unifying decision of United Colleges of Supreme Court1 tried to supplement this lack, deciding to transfer all the files registered from the Court of First Instance to Administrative Courts. The aim of this study is to analyze the legal situation created after Administrative Courts establishment and their function. Is the Supreme Court decision in conform to the Albanian Constitution? The study is focused in the legal arguments of how to improve Administrative Courts function in order to guarantee effective protection of the rights and legitimate interests through a regular judicial process.
Jus, International Law & Economics, History & Society, 2017
The reform of the judicial system, which has recently been implemented in Albania, has included many elements about the organization and functioning of the courts and the public prosecutor's office. The main objective was to fight corruption and regain the public confidence in the judiciary. But in the framework of this reform, many important changes have been made, which affacted and changed some parts of the constitutional justice system, thus increasing the individual's access to the Constitutional Court. Regardless of the negative public opinion about the judicial system in general, public opinion is different as regard the Constitutional Court. Although we can not confirm that this opinion is totally positive, in general, the opinion about the Court is more positive from Albanian public. The main activity of this Court is linked to the defense of fundamental rights and freedoms, even though its jurisdiction so far has been limited. So individuals could claim to the Constitutional Court, only when their rights for a fair trial were violated. This restriction, which was also evident in the interpretation of the same Constitutional Court, which applied the fair process solely from the procedural point of view, and not the substantive one, resulted in limiting the access of the individual. However, individual requests to this Court increased year after year. For this reason, the legislator has, in the context of the new constitutional amendments, envisioned an extension of the circle of subjects who may appeal to the Constitutional Court and have as their mission the defense of the fundamental human rights and freedoms. An important change has also been made to the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court, which can now accept and analyze individual claims about the violation of all rights under the Albanian constitution. This way of acting, extending the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court, but also extending the circle of people who can appeal to this court, leads to the creation of two mechanisms, according to which individuals can access the constitutional justice system. The first possibility is the direct one. According to this possibility, the individual can directly access the Constitutional Court, but as a mechanism takes longer and is much longer, because it requires as a prerequisite the exhaustion of all legal means available. The purpose of this presentation is precisely the analysis of the second possibility, given that it is the only direct means with which the individual can personally dialogue with the Constitutional Court. The second is the indirect one. On the basis of this possibility, the individual may submit a complaint to the institutions which, according to the Constitution, may appeal to the Constitutional Court. In this way, these institutions, if they note that violations of the constitutional rights of the individual are due to legal action, have the right to apply to the Constitutional Court. This possibility, even if it leaves the possibility of appeal in the judgment of another body, has the advantage of being a shorter road to addressing the constitutional system for the defense of civil rights.
CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY OF THE PRESIDENT OF REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA
Vision International Scientific Journal, 2020
It is very important to determine the level of authority of the head of state, who is directly elected by the people, in the classification of the government systems of the countries. In this sense, although the traditional theory is insufficient, it will be useful to benefit from the modern theory. Therefore, it is important to determine the level of authority by using the measurement table of Shugart and Carey developed by Metcalf for the determination of the level of authority of the president elected by the people in the 1991 Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia and to determine the government system applied in this context. Compared to the semipresidential government system (prototype of the French Republic V) or the mixed dualist government systems, unlike the traditional parliamentary government system, the President of the Republic of Macedonia is considered as a factor that increases the democratic legitimacy of the election of the President directly by the people, not by the parliament. However, if the powers of the head of state are not symbolic, election by the people will increase the possibilities that may cause a shift in the axis, and especially if the head of the political party with the parliamentary majority comes to the presidency advocates the idea that systemic problems may arise and therefore it would be more beneficial to return to the method of electing the head of state by the parliament in order to avoid such drawbacks. In addition, it should be emphasized that the counter-signature rule must be foreseen within the constitutional order. From this point of view, the subject of this study will examine the constitutional powers of the President of the Republic of Macedonia according to the 1991 Constitution and the level of these powers.