A comparative study of the effect of induction of labour with vaginal misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 gel on the incidence of pathological cardiotocography tracing (original ) (raw )Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor
Debby Debby
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of Labor: A Comparative Study of Intravaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone
Usman Farooq
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Low Doses of Vaginal Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for Induction of Labor in Uncomplicated Term Pregnancy
Enliven: Gynecology and Obstetrics , hend saleh
Enliven Archive, 2018
View PDFchevron_right
To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of 25mcg Intravaginal Misoprostol And 0.5mg Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel For Induction of Labour
IOSR Journals
View PDFchevron_right
Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial
Eray Çalışkan
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2009
View PDFchevron_right
A Prospective Clinical Study to Compare Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel with Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour
sukanta misra
2020
View PDFchevron_right
A randomized controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for labor induction
Attibele Manjunath
2011
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison between effectiveness of sublingual misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone gel for induction of labour in pregnant women
Dhira Das
International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of Intravaginal Misoprostol Tablet (Prostaglandin E1) and Intracervical Dinoprostone (Prostaglandin E2) Gel in Induction of Labour
Medical Journal IMJ Health
View PDFchevron_right
A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction
Sicco Scherjon
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
95 Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction? A randomized controlled trial
Patrick Dällenbach
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2001
View PDFchevron_right
Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel
Peter Danielian
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1999
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone
Mine Uner
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1997
View PDFchevron_right
A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor
Irene Hoesli
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
View PDFchevron_right
Dinoprostone and Misoprostol for Induction of Labour at Term Pregnancy
shehla baqai
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 2016
View PDFchevron_right
A comparative study of low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for induction of labour at term of pregnancy
neelam swaroop
International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology
View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: a randomized prospective study
Konstantinos Zikopoulos , Evangelos Papanikolaou
Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
A comparison of vaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour at term
Ambreen Malik
View PDFchevron_right
Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial
Patrick Dällenbach
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003
View PDFchevron_right
Labor induction with prostaglandin E 1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: A randomized trial
luis ramos
Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Prediction of adverse outcome associated with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction
Eray Caliskan
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2003
View PDFchevron_right
Oral misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal tablets for labor induction
Khaled Aish
View PDFchevron_right
Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E 2 gel for induction of labor at term
Richard STUBBLEFIELD
Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
View PDFchevron_right
Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert
V. Gerosa , Federico Prefumo
Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Comparing the outcomes of labour induction with misoprostol and dinoprostone at Amino Kano teaching Hospital Kano Norhtwest Nigeria
ibrahim yakasai
Tropical journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Titrated oral misoprostol solution for induction of labour: a multi-centre, randomised trial
Cheryl Nikodem
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001
View PDFchevron_right