A comparative study of the effect of induction of labour with vaginal misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 gel on the incidence of pathological cardiotocography tracing (original) (raw)

Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor

Debby Debby

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Induction of Labor: A Comparative Study of Intravaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone

Usman Farooq

Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Low Doses of Vaginal Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for Induction of Labor in Uncomplicated Term Pregnancy

Enliven: Gynecology and Obstetrics, hend saleh

Enliven Archive, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

To Compare the Safety and Efficacy of 25mcg Intravaginal Misoprostol And 0.5mg Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel For Induction of Labour

IOSR Journals

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial

Eray Çalışkan

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

A Prospective Clinical Study to Compare Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel with Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour

sukanta misra

2020

View PDFchevron_right

A randomized controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for labor induction

Attibele Manjunath

2011

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison between effectiveness of sublingual misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone gel for induction of labour in pregnant women

Dhira Das

International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of Intravaginal Misoprostol Tablet (Prostaglandin E1) and Intracervical Dinoprostone (Prostaglandin E2) Gel in Induction of Labour

Medical Journal IMJ Health

View PDFchevron_right

A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction

Sicco Scherjon

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

95 Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction? A randomized controlled trial

Patrick Dällenbach

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel

Peter Danielian

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

Induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone

Mine Uner

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

A double-blind comparison of the safety and efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 to induce labor

Irene Hoesli

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

Dinoprostone and Misoprostol for Induction of Labour at Term Pregnancy

shehla baqai

Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

A comparative study of low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone gel for induction of labour at term of pregnancy

neelam swaroop

International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: a randomized prospective study

Konstantinos Zikopoulos, Evangelos Papanikolaou

Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

A comparison of vaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour at term

Ambreen Malik

View PDFchevron_right

Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: A randomized controlled trial

Patrick Dällenbach

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Labor induction with prostaglandin E 1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: A randomized trial

luis ramos

Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Prediction of adverse outcome associated with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction

Eray Caliskan

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Oral misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal tablets for labor induction

Khaled Aish

View PDFchevron_right

Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E 2 gel for induction of labor at term

Richard STUBBLEFIELD

Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995

View PDFchevron_right

Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert

V. Gerosa, Federico Prefumo

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

Comparing the outcomes of labour induction with misoprostol and dinoprostone at Amino Kano teaching Hospital Kano Norhtwest Nigeria

ibrahim yakasai

Tropical journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Titrated oral misoprostol solution for induction of labour: a multi-centre, randomised trial

Cheryl Nikodem

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001

View PDFchevron_right