Relationships between Maritime Container Terminals and Dry Ports and their impact on Inter-port competition (original) (raw)
Related papers
The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland
Journal of Transport Geography, 2009
The dry port concept is based on a seaport directly connected by rail with inland intermodal terminals where containers can be dealt with in the same way as if they were in a seaport. The main purpose of the article is to extend the theory behind the dry port concept and to define three dry port categories; distant, midrange and close. The findings show that the dry port concept can help identify ways of shifting freight volumes from road to more energy efficient traffic modes that are less harmful to the environment, relieve seaport cities from some congestion and facilitate improved logistics solutions for shippers in the port's hinterland.
Inland freight distribution and the sub-harborization of port terminals
2004
Inland distribution is becoming a very important dimension of the globalization / maritime transportation / freight distribution paradigm. Observed logistics integration and network orientation in the port and maritime industry have redefined the functional role of ports in value chains and have generated new patterns of freight distribution and new approaches to port hierarchy. Inland freight distribution constitutes more than ever a cornerstone in port competitiveness. Existing models on the spatial and functional evolution of ports and port systems only partially fit into the new freight distribution paradigm. This paper aims to add to the existing literature by introducing a 'regionalization' phase in port and port system development. The regionalization phase and associated new hinterland concepts demand new approaches to port governance and a functional focus that goes beyond the traditional port perimeter.
The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation
Transport Policy, 2013
The port regionalisation concept extended earlier spatial models of port development with a focus on institutional relationships governing the complexity of inland connections. The concept accounts for the fact that modern ports operate in an increasingly complex and sophisticated transport and logistics environment, embedded within multi-scalar planning regimes. This paper addresses the role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation by reviewing the literature on the three core aspects of the concept: intermodal terminals, inland logistics and collective action problems. Results reveal that inland terminals developed by landside actors often experience a conflict of strategy with port actors (either port authorities or terminal operators). Port actors have difficulty acting beyond the port perimeter but some port terminal operators have begun to demonstrate successful investments in inland terminals in order to manage their container throughput more strategically. Inland logistics markets tend to be centralised and focus heavily on domestic flows, thus the efficiency of intermodal freight services is challenged by the need to combine port and domestic movements which have different product, route and equipment characteristics. Collective action is an arena where port actors can be influential due to the role of informal networking in managing freight corridors; however, institutional constraints limit their ability to act directly. The findings in this paper elucidate challenges to the ability of ports to control or capture hinterlands through the strategies of integration that the port regionalisation concept proposes. The paper concludes by proposing a research agenda developing from recent institutional adaptations of port actors as a result of these challenges.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT ENGINEERING, 2021
This paper presented the benefits of a seaport in intermodal transport which is connected by railway with dry ports in the region of Western Balkans in order to increase its competitiveness. Port of Bar is considered as a case study. The aim of this paper was to confirm the hypothesis that a seaport connected to its hinterland by regular container trains has a competitive position, lower intermodal transport costs than a port connected to its hinterland by truck transport only. The special attention was given to the Serbian market, the main hinterland of Bar port. The comparative analysis of intermodal transport between the Port of Bar and the main economic centers in Serbia, confirmed the hypothesis. The use of rail transport for transport of containers is a prerequisite for increasing competitiveness of a seaport.
Exploring seaport - dry ports dyadic integration to meet the increase in container vessels size
Journal of Shipping and Trade
This paper explores the implications of vessel enlargement on seaport competitiveness and investigates the dyadic integration between seaports and dry ports to address drastic vessel size acceleration in the Malaysian seaport system. Therefore, this paper aims to reveal the seaport/dry port dyadic relationship to improve seaport competitiveness in light of the increase in vessel size in the arena of global trade. To achieve this aim, mixed methods were applied by conducting qualitative and quantitative approaches concurrently. The outcome of this paper indicates that vessel enlargement has caused several problems in seaports including reduction in operational efficiency, congestion, limited capacity and infrastructure support, outdated policies for existing seaport development, urgent needs for additional investment in spatial development, as well as requirements for new structure in manpower training. Furthermore, the integration of dry ports in the seaport system to deal with vessel size enlargement is expected to improve seaport accessibility through improved infrastructure and service quality as well as increased capacity and efficiency.
The worldwide maritime network of container shipping: spatial structure and regional dynamics
Global Networks, 2012
Port and maritime studies dealing with containerization have observed traffic concentration and dispersion throughout the world. Globalization, intermodal transportation, and technological revolutions in the shipping industry have resulted in both network extension and rationalization. However, lack of precise data on inter-port relations prevent the application of wider network theories to global maritime container networks, which are often examined through case studies of specific firms or regions. This paper presents an analysis of the global liner shipping network in 1996 and 2006, a period of rapid change in port hierarchies and liner service configurations. While it refers to literature on port system development, shipping networks, and port selection, it is one of the only analyses of the properties of the global container shipping network. The paper analyzes the relative position of ports in the global network through indicators of centrality. The results reveal a certain level of robustness in the global shipping network. While transhipment hub flows and gateway flows might slightly shift among nodes in the network, the network properties remain rather stable in terms of the main nodes polarizing the network and the overall structure of the system. Additionally, mapping the changing centrality of ports confirms the impacts of global trade and logistics shifts on the port hierarchy and indicates that changes are predominantly geographic.
Challenges in the maritime-land interface: port hinterlands and regionalization
2006
In addition to the complex logistical setting in which maritime shippers and ports are operating, port hinterlands have received renewed attention. The integration of transport functions provided by logistics and the re-orientation of maritime networks have redefined the functional role of ports in value chains and have generated new patterns of freight distribution and new approaches to port development. Among the notable challenges are attempts to capture a greater share of added value by favoring the development of logistical zones in the vicinity of port sites. Further, the development of better hinterland connections in many cases has become as important as the port facilities themselves to secure additional traffic. Maritime shippers and inland transport companies have become actively involved in providing more efficient (capacity, cost and time-wise) hinterland connections. It can thus be argued that the development of port systems has entered a phase of "regionalization". Regionalization represents a setting where inland distribution becomes of foremost importance in port competition, favoring the emergence of transport corridors and logistics hubs. The port itself is not the chief motivator for and instigator of regionalization. Regionalization results from logistics decisions and subsequent actions of shippers and third party logistics providers.
Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics
Journal of Transport Geography, 2010
The emergence of inland ports took place in several regions around the world, notably where the growth of inland freight distribution required a massification of flows. Yet, there is no definitive consensus about how such inland facilities should be labeled, with terms such as dry ports being advocated. It is suggested in the paper that the term inland port is a more appropriate construct since it considers terminal activities as well as the crucial logistics activities taking place in co-location or in proximity of inland terminals. This perspective requires the investigation of how transport and supply chain functions and the various actors involved in their setting and operations are taking shape in inland ports. Case studies pertaining to European and North American inland ports are presented. Although inland ports are planned, set and operated by a wide variety of actors, ranging from public to private interests, transport and supply chain functions tend to label them as satellite terminals, load centers or transmodal centers.