Fallacious Argument Classification in Political Debates (original) (raw)
Related papers
Yes, we can! Mining Arguments in 50 Years of US Presidential Campaign Debates
Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
A Context-Aware Approach for Detecting Check-Worthy Claims in Political Debates
ArXiv, 2019
Recognizing the Forms of Fallacious Arguments
2004
An annotated corpus of argument schemes in US election debates
Jacky Visser, Jean H.M. Wagemans
ISSA 2018 Proceedings, 2019
2018
A Context-Aware Approach for Detecting Worth-Checking Claims in Political Debates
RANLP 2017 - Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing Meet Deep Learning, 2017
Detecting Attackable Sentences in Arguments
Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)
Counter-Argument Generation by Attacking Weak Premises
2021
Argument Undermining: Counter-Argument Generation by Attacking Weak Premises
ArXiv, 2021
Automatic Argument Quality Assessment - New Datasets and Methods
VivesDebate: A New Annotated Multilingual Corpus of Argumentation in a Debate Tournament
Applied Sciences
DISPUTool - A tool for the Argumentative Analysis of Political Debates
2019
Analysis of Fallacies in Hillary and Trump's Second Presidential Debate
International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences
2022
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2018
Towards Effective Rebuttal: Listening Comprehension Using Corpus-Wide Claim Mining
Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining
Annotation of Argument Components in Political Debates Data
2018
Using Convolutional Neural Network in Cross-Domain Argumentation Mining Framework
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2019
A Dataset of General-Purpose Rebuttal
Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)
Detecting Arguments and Their Positions in Experimental Communication Data
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022
How can you say such things?!?: Recognizing Disagreement in Informal Political Argument
2011
The SEEMPAD Dataset for Emphatic and Persuasive Argumentation
Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it 2018, 2018
Machine-Aided Annotation for Fine-Grained Proposition Types in Argumentation
2020
Toward Artificial Argumentation
AI Magazine, 2017
“Sharks are not the threat humans are”: Argument Component Segmentation in School Student Essays
2021
Towards Artificial Argumentation
AI Magazine
2016
Deep Neural Ranking Models for Argument Retrieval
2020
A Critical Discussion Game for Prohibiting Fallacies
Logic and Logical Philosophy
Determining Relative Argument Specificity and Stance for Complex Argumentative Structures
Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Argument structures of political debates
Digital History and Hermeneutics
CNN- and LSTM-based claim classification in online user comments
Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (COLING 2016)